Criminal responsibility of medical professionals: discussion issues
( Pp. 53-58)

This article presents the author's research on the topical problem of qualification of crimes committed by medical workers. The author has formulated a number of proposals aimed at the comprehensive improvement of the criminal law and for effective enforcement. This work aims to study the issue of criteria for quality medical care and solving the problem of increasing the effectiveness of Russian legislation on liability for crimes committed by medical workers. Methodology and methods: the article uses the comparative legal research method, as well as the method of interpreting legal norms, which make it possible to better comprehend the institutions of criminal law and determine the main directions of their development. Conclusions: the problem of the presence of imperfections in the current legislation is relevant for study. Auto draws the attention of the scientific community to the fact that in this area there is still no clear idea of what is meant by quality medical care (service), as well as the necessary differentiation between deliberate and careless harm caused by the provision of medical care. Also, the author points to the lack of specificity of the concept of "medical error", as well as the lack of parameters for determining the legal personality for this type of employee. Scope of the results: this article may be of interest to students of higher educational institutions: bachelors, undergraduates, graduate students who study this area of criminal law, as well as this material may be of interest to teachers of law universities, can be used as a guide for the preparation of practical and seminars.

Serebrennikova A.V., (2021), CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS: DISCUSSION ISSUES. Sociopolitical Sciences, 1 => 53-58. DOI: 10.33693/2223-0092-2021-11-1-53-58

Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13 iyunya 1996 g. № 63-FZ (red. ot 30.12.2020) // Sobr. zakonodatel stva Ros. Federatsii. 1996. № 25. st. 2954.
Vseobshchaya deklaratsiya prav cheloveka (prinyata General noy Assambleey OON 10.12.1948) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 1998. 10 dek.
Vseobshchaya deklaratsiya o genome cheloveka i pravakh cheloveka: prinyata 11.11.1997 General noy konferentsiey Organizatsii Ob edinennykh Natsiy po voprosam obrazovaniya, nauki i kul tury // SPS Konsul tantPlyus (data obrashcheniya: 03.02.2021).
Evropeyskaya konventsiya o pravakh cheloveka i biomeditsine, prinyataya v Ov edo 04.04.1997. URL: http://www.imbp.ru/BioEtika/Principles/Convention.html (data obrashcheniya: 03.02.2021).
Vseobshchaya deklaratsiya o bioetike i pravakh cheloveka, prinyataya putem akklamatsii 19.10.2005 na 33-y sessii General noy konferentsii YUNESKO. URL: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001461/146180r.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 03.02.2021).
Beley K.S. Vracha obvinili v khalatnosti. Kak zashchitit ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Pravovye voprosy v zdravookhranenii. 2020. № 4. S. 58-67.
Berestov A.A. Otgranichenie vrachebnoy oshibki ot professional nogo prestupleniya / V sbornike statey XXIX Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. M., 2019. S. 176-179.
Zyryanova O.G., Tonkonog V. Korporativnyy Kodeks organizatsii na primere klyatvy Gippokrata. V sbornike: Aktual nye problemy mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy v usloviyakh formirovaniya mul tipolyarnogo mira // V sb.: Sbornik nauchnykh statey VIII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. M., 2019. S. 151-154.
Krugova N.V., Stepanova L.V. YUridicheskie aspekty razgranicheniya vrachebnoy oshibki i neschastnogo sluchaya pri osushchestvlenii meditsinskoy deyatel nosti / V sb.: Problemy sovremennykh integratsionnykh protsessov i poisk innovatsionnykh resheniy: sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Ufa, 2020. S. 17-21.
Kudakov A.V. Vrachebnaya oshibka i ee ugolovno-pravovaya otsenka: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.08 / Kudakov Aleksandr Vladimirovich; Mesto zashchity: Sarat. gos. akad. prava . Saratov, 2011. 185 s.
Mil kov A.V. Zametki k voprosu o razrabotke teorii yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti // Obrazovanie i pravo. 2020. № 1. S. 71-79.
CHebotareva G.V. Problemy ugolovno-pravovoy otsenki vrachebnoy oshibki // Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal nogo universiteta imeni V.I. Vernadskogo. YUridicheskie nauki. 2019. T. 5 (71). № 1. S. 205-214.
SHCHekleina E.S. K voprosu ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za vrachebnuyu oshibku / V sb.: Teoreticheskie aspekty yurisprudentsii i voprosy pravoprimeneniya: sbornik statey po materialam XXIII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. 2019. S. 120-124.
Obzor sudebnoy praktiki VS RF po ugolovnym delam za otchetnye periody 2020 goda. Prezidium VS RF. Elektronnyy resurs . Sayt Verkhovnogo suda RF. Dostup: http://www.supcourt.ru/documents/practice/ year 2020 (data obrashcheniya: 03.02.2020).
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Stavropol skogo kraevogo suda ot 01.10.2019 po delu № 33-6755/2019. Trebovanie: O vzyskanii kompensatsii moral nogo vreda, shtrafa. Obstoyatel stva: V rezul tate nekachestvennogo okazaniya meditsinskoy pomoshchi nastupila smert novorozhdennogo rebenka // Dokument opublikovan ne byl.
Minzdrav ozvuchil statistiku oslozhneniy i gibeli rossiyan iz-za vrachebnykh oshibok // Sayt Interfaks . URL: https://lenta.ru/news/2020/02/08/ohh/ (data obrashcheniya: 05.02.21).
Sledstvennyy komitet vozbudil seriyu ugolovnykh del ob ubiystvennykh oshibkakh // Sayt Sledstvennyy komitet RF . URL: https://sledcom.ru/press/smi/item/507534/ (data obrashcheniya: 05.02.21).
SK RF opublikoval popravki v UK o nakazanii za vrachebnye oshibki // Ofitsial nyy sayt RAPSI. URL: http://rapsinews.ru/legislation news/20190620/300793398.html : :text (data obrashcheniya: 07.02.2021).

health, harm, medical worker, legal responsibility, service, legislation, intent.