RATIO OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF ORGANIZATION OF MUTUAL ADAPTATION OF CIVILIZATIONS IN THE STRATEGY OF THEIR SURVIVAL
( Pp. 141-145)

More about authors
Azhybekova Clara A. doktor filosofskih nauk, professor; akademik Rossiyskoy Narodnoy Akademii nauk
Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University Togusakov Osmon A. doktor filosofskih nauk, professor, chlen-korrespondent, vice-prezident Nacionalnoy akademii nauk Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki
National Academy of Sciences of the Kyrgyz Republic Brusilovskiy Denis A. kandidat filosofskih nauk, docent kafedry YuNESKO po izucheniyu mirovoy kultury i religiy
Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University Akmatova Nazgul S. kandidat filosofskih nauk, starshiy nauchnyy sotrudnik
Institute of philosophy and political legal studies of the National Academy of Sciences of the Kyrgyz Republic Smutko Alexey N. kandidat filosofskih nauk, zaveduyuschiy kafedroy
Institute of philosophy and political legal studies of the National Academy of Sciences of the Kyrgyz Republic
Abstract:
Relevance of the article. Due to globalization the society is developing a strategy for humanity survival. Some civilizations hurry to join somewhat unions, i.e. Turkey and Ukraine to the European Union, others are eager to leave such unions like the United Kingdom hurried out the EU. Objectives of the study. In the survival strategy it becomes necessary to indicate levels for civilizations mutual adoption specification - levels of person, society, nature, West, East, public and private property, as well as between states, steady excess of mortality over birth rate, depopulation and demographic explosion, between religious organizations, political and geopolitical unions. Research model. Globally there is no unified and consequent strategy for civilizations survival which could determine mutual cultural adoption possibilities, the next scientific and technological revolution challenges and be of essential importance for European society in Islamophobia conditions. Islamophobia is partially a by-product of power and rivalry between the political elites of Europe and the United States in the era after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Conclusions. Over the past decades intercultural dialogue and adaptation possibilities of Eastern civilization have been sharply decreasing in the context of liberal ideology rejection in the morality, politics, law and degrading Western mentality over-dictatorship spheres. Non-eventual general mutual adoption of civilizations based on Western values as well as destroyed states - Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan - are the evidence. Originality of the article. The authors of the article offer a future strategy for the humanity survival and remind of what is worth living for. The mutual civilizations integration is meant to be a life strategy and the development of civilizations as a tactic allowing the living to be kept in a certain evolutionary framework thus ensuring whole society progress possibility.
How to Cite:
Azhybekova C.A., Togusakov O.A., Brusilovskiy D.A., Akmatova N.S., Smutko A.N., (2019), RATIO OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF ORGANIZATION OF MUTUAL ADAPTATION OF CIVILIZATIONS IN THE STRATEGY OF THEIR SURVIVAL. Sociopolitical Sciences, 1 => 141-145.
Reference list:
i ek S. Absolute Recoil: Towards A New Foundation Of Dialectical Materialism. London, 2014. 415 pp.
Pfaller R. On The Pleasure Principle In Culture: Illusions Without Owners. London / New York, 2014. 288 pp.
Ferri L. Kratkaya istoriya mysli. Traktat po filosofii dlya podrastayushchego pokoleniya / per. s frants. S. Ryndina. M., 2018. 272 s.
Pfaller R. Radi chego stoit zhit . Nachala materialisticheskoy filosofii / per. s nem.; pod nauch. red. A. Smirnova. M., 2018. 384 s.
KHantington S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy / per. s angl. T. Velimeeva. M., 2018. 640 s.
Bazian H. Islamophobia, Clash of Civilizations , and Forging a Post-Cold War Order // Religions. 2018. Vol. 9(9), iss. 282. P. 1-13.
Grosfoguel R, Mielants E. The Long-Dur e Entanglement Between Islamophobia and Racism in the Modern/Colonial Capitalist/Patriarchal World-System: An Introduction // Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge. Vol. 5, iss. 1/2. 2006. P. 1-12.
Grosfoguel R, Oso L, Christou A. Racism , Intersectionality and Migration Studies: Framing Some Theoretical Reflections // Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power. 2015. Vol. 22, iss. 6. P. 635-652.
Azhybekova K.A., Brusilovskiy D.A., Esipov I.I. Metodologiya adaptatsii musul man-migrantov k evropeyskoy kul ture // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2017. № 7 (110). S. 351-355.
Brusilovskiy D.A. Vozmozhnosti islama v kontekste vnutrireligioznogo, mezhreligioznogo i mezhkul turnogo dialoga v sovremennuyu epokhu // Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul tura. 2016. № 10. S. 16-22.
Flynn M.T., Ledeen M. The Field of Fight: How We Can Win the Global War Against Radical Islam and Its Allies. New York, 2016. 208 p.
KHantington S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy / per. s angl. T. Velimeeva. M., 2016. 640 s.
Pfaller R. Radi chego stoit zhit . Nachala materialisticheskoy filosofii / per. s nem.; pod nauch. red. A. Smirnova. M., 2018. 384 s.
Leybnits G.V. Sochineniya : v 4 t. T.4. M., 1989. 554 s.