Comparative Analysis of the Development of Ethnopolitical Systems of Korean and Japanese Civilization in the Subsystem of International Relations of Northeast Asia
( Pp. 182-187)

More about authors
Nikiforov Svyatoslav Vadimovich Lecturer at the Department of International Law, ; Senior Lecturer at the Department of History, Theory of State and Law and International Law; Moscow International University
All-Russian Academy of Foreign Trade of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation
Moscow, Russia Moscow International University, Moscow, Russia
Abstract:
The purpose and objectives. The main goal is a comparative analysis of the development of the ethnopolitical systems of Korean and Japanese civilization in the subsystem of international relations in Northeast Asia. Methodological approach. The L.N. Gumilev’s methodology takes first place in the work, as well as the systematic approach developed in oriental political science by A.D. Voskresensky. The Reasearch is also based on general scientific methods of cognition and political forecasting. Results and conclusions. The article briefly analyzes the development of the Korean and Japanese ethnosystems in the region, and gives a forecast of the further development of political processes in these countries. Originality and value. The research is valuable in view of its relevance and originality of the work, which focuses on obtaining new knowledge about the nature of the Japanese and Korean ethnic systems and studying the features of the development of these ethnogenesis in the context of the political development of the subsystem of international relations in Northeast Asia.
How to Cite:
Nikiforov S.V., (2022), COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF ETHNOPOLITICAL SYSTEMS OF KOREAN AND JAPANESE CIVILIZATION IN THE SUBSYSTEM OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS OF NORTHEAST ASIA. Sociopolitical Sciences, 4 => 182-187.
Reference list:
Gumilyov L.N. Synchrony. III. Outbreaks of ethnogenesis [Electronic resource]. 1990. URL: http://gumilevica.kulichki.net/EAB/eab03.htm#eab03chapter10
Gumilyov L.N. Ethnogenesis and biosphere of the earth. 7. Axes of zones of passionary pushes [Electronic resource]. 1979. URL: http://gumilevica.kulichki.net/maps/ebe07.html
Dashibalov E.B. Xiongnu and ancient Koreans: commonality of the genesis of cultures. Bulletin of the Buryat State University. 2010. No. 8. Pp. 192-194. (In Rus.)
Ivanov A.Yu. Ethnogenesis of the Japanese. To the question of the influence of Koreans on the process of formation of the Japanese nation. Russia and Asia-Pacific. 2001. No. 1. Pp. 40-47. (In Rus.)
History of Korea according to Lev Gumilyov. Koryo saram. 2009 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://koryo-saram.ru/istoriya-korei-po-l-vu-gumilyovu/
Meshcheryakov A.N. Understanding the environment in the process of self-identification of Japan and the Japanese. Japan Yearbook (Institute of Oriental Studies RAS). 2015. Vol. 44. Pp. 266-288. (In Rus.)
Osmanov E.M. Features of Japan’s foreign policy in the XII - mid-XVI centuries. Bulletin of Science and Education. 2015. No. 8 (10). Pp. 45-50. (In Rus.)
Pak E.G. Socio-philosophical analysis of the history of the formation of the mentality of the Korean people. Bulletin of the Kemerovo State University. 2015. No. 1 (61). Vol. 2. Pp. 151-155. (In Rus.)
Poo Ji Yong. Ilbong, to hanay hanguk (Japan is another Korea). Seoul, 1995.
Rebrei S.M. Transnationalization of Japanese business: Monograph. Moscow: MGIMO-University, 2015.
Simonova E.V. The Japanese and Japanese culture. Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. Series: History, Philology. 2016. Vol. 15. No. 10: Oriental studies. Pp. 108-116. (In Rus.)
Smertin Yu.G. Pirates of the East Asian Seas: private business and big politics. Theory and Practice of Social Development. 2012. No. 4. Pp. 181-185. (In Rus.)
Keywords:
L.N. Gumilev’s theory, ethnopolitical system, Korean and Japanese ethnic systems, subsystem of international relations in Northeast Asia.


Related Articles

International Relations Pages: 91-95 DOI: 10.33693/2223-0092-2022-12-5-91-95 Issue №21982
Analysis of the Formation of the Subsystem of International Relations in Northeast Asia from the Point of View of the Civilizational Approach Part 2
ethnopolitical system ethnic and non-ethnic systems Mongolian-Chinese-centric order subsystem of international relations in Northeast Asia ideology and model of foreign policy
Show more
International Relations Pages: 162-168 DOI: 10.33693/2223-0092-2022-12-4-162-168 Issue №21553
Analysis of the Formation of the Subsystem of International Relations in Northeast Asia from the Point of View of the Civilizational Approach. Part 1
ethnopolitical system superethnic level nonethnic systems ethnosphere periodization of models of international relations
Show more