Modern View of Praxeology as a Political Science
( Pp. 24-30)

More about authors
Orlova Irina V.
Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Moscow, Russian Federation Paveleva Tatyana Yu.
Moscow State Technological University “Stankin”
Moscow, Russian Federation Sgibneva Alena A.
Abstract:
In recent years – the years of geopolitical instability – the public expects political scientists to understand the upcoming threats and scientifically based political forecasts. Among the existing methods and approaches of political analysis, praxeology mains the most non-theoretical subject of political science. The historical development of praxeology has shown that today it can be applied to a system of hostile actions that are an integral part of international relations. Using the example of K. Boulding’s threat system, a praxeological approach was applied to the EU’s sanctions policy against Russia. The key factors that increase the likelihood of threats and corresponding responses to them were identified. The results of the contextual study of praxeology have shown the prospect for further theoretical developments in the field of political analysis and the development of praxeology as an actual subdiscipline of political science.
How to Cite:
Orlova I.V., Paveleva T.Yu., Sgibneva A.A. Modern View of Praxeology as a Political Science. Sociopolitical Sciences. 2023. Vol. 13. No. 6. Pр. 24–30. (In Rus.) DOI: 10.33693/2223-0092-2023-13-6-24-30. EDN: ABSUFH
Reference list:
Aron R. Peace and war: A theory of international relations. V.I. Danilenko (ed.). Moscow: Nota Bene, 2000.
Pavlovich A.A. Praxeology of science and praxeological opportunities. Technologic. 2010. No. 2. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/praksiologiya-nauk-i-ih-prakseologicheskie-vozmozhnosti-1
Boulding K.E. Towards a pure theory of threat systems. The American Economic Review. 1963. Vol. 53. No. 5.
Garfinkel H. Recherches en ethbomethodologie. M. Barthelemy, B. Dupret, J.-M. de Queiroz, L. Quere (trad. France). Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2007.
Habermas J. Theory and practice. Boston, USA: Beacon Press, 1973.
Luze H. Ethnomethodologie orale et grammaires generatives des moeurs. Paris: Loris Talmart, 1996.
Montbrial de T. Le systeme international: approach et dynamiques. Politique étrangère. HIVER. 2006. Vol. 71. No. 4.
Olgiati F. Carmelo Ottaviano e la prassiologia. Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica: Vita e Pensiero – Pubblicazioni dell’Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore. 1954. Vol. 46. No. 6.
Ostrowski J. Réponse à un appel. In: Mathématiques et sciences humaines. T. 19, 1967.
Parsons T. The action ftame of reference and the general theory of action systems. In: Classic Contribution to Social Psychology. E.P. Hollander, R.G. Hunt (eds.). New York; London; Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1972.
Keywords:
praxeology, threat system, political analysis, political approach, international relations..


Related Articles

History and Theory of Politics Pages: 13-23 DOI: 10.33693/2223-0092-2023-13-6-13-23 Issue №46090
Prognostic Component of the Civilizational State Modern Russia and of its Spiritual and Moral Imperatives
political analysis civilizational state spiritual and moral imperatives imperialism Russian Identity
Show more