REMEDIAL FEATURES OF CONSIDERATION OF CASES ON SOLICITATION OF DOCUMENTS FROM THE EXECUTIVE BODY OF THE LEGAL ENTITY
( Pp. 167-171)

Authors of the article have researched legislation of the Russian Federation and practice in the application of legal standards with regard to consideration of corporate disputes, such as reclamation of documents from the Executive body of a legal entity. Analysis of the judicial practice allows to find two completely different approaches to the consideration of such cases. The first one assumes that if the Executive body of a legal entity fails to deliver requested documents to the interested party regarding organization, administration and activities of the legal entity, the courts will proceed from presumption of bad faith of actions (inaction) of the Executive body of the legal entity. The second one implies that the courts consider such legal actions as vindicatory. In this case the claimant shall prove facts, such as the loss of actual possession of the documents, the ability to find the requested documents with the help of individual characteristics, the respondent’s illicit possession of the documents. The authors of the published work doubt in the correctness of the use of the “corporate dispute” term with regard to the organization of the legal entities, administration of them and participation in their activities, and express their opinion on some doubtful issues of legal proceedings concerning reclamation of the documents from the Executive body of a legal entity. The article is intended for authors, engaged in the research of theoretical and practical issues of legal proceedings related to the corporate disputes, as well as for a wide range of practicing lawyers, interested in the corporate law, arbitration and civil proceedings.

Burova I.L., Rudov M.V., (2017), REMEDIAL FEATURES OF CONSIDERATION OF CASES ON SOLICITATION OF DOCUMENTS FROM THE EXECUTIVE BODY OF THE LEGAL ENTITY. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 4 => 167-171.

Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 23.06.2015 №25 O primenenii sudami nekotorykh polozheniy razdela I chasti pervoy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Rossiyskaya gazeta, № 140, 30.06.2015.
Belova D.A. Problemy istrebovaniya imushchestva iz chuzhogo nezakonnogo vladeniya //Vestnik Samarskoy gumanitarnoy akademii. Seriya Pravo . 2010. №2 (8). S.33-47.
Zakoshanskiy M.V. Evolyutsiya vindikatsionnogo spora // Pravo. ZHurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. 2015. №3. S.42-49.
Kosenko E.V. Zashchita prav sobstvennika (titul nogo vladel tsa) posredstvom vindikatsionnogo iska // Zashchita grazhdanskikh prav v usloviyakh reformirovaniya grazhdanskogo i grazhdanskogo protsessual nogo zakonodatel stv. SPb.: ID Petropolis , 2015. S.113-117.
Polozhenie o dokumentakh i dokumentooborote v bukhgalterskom uchete, utverzhdennogo Minfinom SSSR 29.07.1983 № 105// Byulleten normativnykh aktov ministerstv i vedomstv SSSR, № 4, 1983/
Lenkovskaya R.R. Protsedura obespecheniya dokazatel stv sudom v grazhdanskom protsesse // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. 2017. № 2. S. 76-79.
Lenkovskaya R.R., Mamaev I.YA. Osobennosti formirovaniya i polnomochiy organov upravleniya obshchestva s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost yu // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2016. № 8. S.103-106.
Starodumova S.YU. Neeffektivnost primeneniya norm o priobretatel noy davnosti kak osnovaniya vozniknoveniya veshchnykh prav // Notarius. 2013. № 5. S. 25-30.
SHilovskaya A.L., Volkova M.A. Pretenzionnoiskovoy poryadok zashchity prav potrebitelya turisticheskikh uslug // Sovremennoe pravo. 2017. № 2. S. 65-69.
SHilovskaya A.L. Povyshenie effektivnosti grazhdanskogo i ugolovnogo protsessa s pomoshch yu mediatsii // YUridicheskiy mir. 2013. № 10. S. 47-50.

corporate dispute, the jurisdiction of corporate disputes, replevin, discovery of documents from the Executive body of the legal entity.