ADMINISTRATIVE LIABILITY FOR COPYRIGHT VIOLATIONS
( Pp. 114-118)
More about authors
Medvedev Pavel S.
aspirant
North-West Institute of Management RASHiGS Rataev Dmitrii P. aspirant
North-West Institute of Management RASHiGS
North-West Institute of Management RASHiGS Rataev Dmitrii P. aspirant
North-West Institute of Management RASHiGS
Abstract:
The author of the article studies the problem of imposition of administrative charges for copyright infringement. The purpose of the research is to identify specific features of administrative liability for copyright violations and analyse these features with the aim of enhancing practical efficiency of relevant legal mechanisms. The article is structured logically to cover the following key issues: legal regulation and protection of copyrights (with a view to determine the legal nature of copyrights and the correlation between the notions of «regulation of rights» and «protection of rights»); copyright infringement (with the focus on examining the disposition of elements of an offence stipulated in the section 1 of the article 7.12 of the Russian Administrative Offence Code); a «counterfeit» as a matter of copyright infringement (aiming to put forth proposals on improving the administrative law); and the practical issues related to imposition of administrative charges for copyright violations (including the competence of authorized government bodies (using the example of customs authorities) to initiate administrative cases against alleged infringers, proper determination of a matter of certain administrative offences and qualification of the counterfeit nature of artwork items with all circumstances considered). The author of the article has used argumentative, empirical, logical and normative methods of research. Examples of court rulings have been provided along with identified major legal and law-enforcement issues.
How to Cite:
Medvedev P.S., Rataev D.P., (2017), ADMINISTRATIVE LIABILITY FOR COPYRIGHT VIOLATIONS. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 3 => 114-118.
Reference list:
Bliznets I., Leont ev K. Nuzhny rabotayushchie mekhanizmy zashchity avtorskikh prav // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 1999. № 11.
Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik / Pod red. doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora E.A. Sukhanova. Tom I. M.: Volters Kluver, 2004.
Dvoretskiy M.YU. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost yuridicheskikh lits v zakonodatel stve Velikobritanii, SSHA i RF: problemy teorii i praktiki primeneniya // Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2011. № 4 (96).
Emel yanov A.S., CHernogor N.N. Finansovo-pravovaya otvetstvennost . M., 2004.
Kelina S.G. Eshche raz ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti yuridicheskikh lits // Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke. M., 2008.
Kolotyrkina S.I. Vidy otvetstvennosti v prave // Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk № 5/2013. M.: IGP RAN, 2013.
Kommentariy k kodeksu ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh / pod obshch. red. E. G. Lipatova, S. E. CHannova. M., 2007 Elektronnyy resurs / SPS Garant . Data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2014.
Lebed (Efremova) V.V. Avtorskoe pravo v pravovoy sisteme sovremennogo rossiyskogo gosudarstva: problemy terminologii // Aktual nye problemy chastnogo prava: trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk № 1 (53) 2016 / otv. red. A.G. Lisitsyn-Svetlanov. M., 2016.
Leyst O.E. Sanktsii i otvetstvennost po sovetskomu pravu. M., 1981.
Lokhbaum V. A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost za narushenie avtorskikh i smezhnykh prav: diss. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2008.
Podshibikhin L., Leont ev K. Produkty mul timedia: pravovye problemy i ekonomicheskie perspektivy // Intellektual naya sobstvennost . Avtorskie i smezhnye prava. 2002. № 9.
Sergeev A.P. Pravo intellektual noy sobstvennosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: uchebnik. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: TK Velbi, 2004.
Svechnikova I.V. Avtorskoe pravo: Uchebnoe posobie. M.: Dashkov i Ko, 2009.
Stenogramma programmy Razgovor s Vladimirom Putinym Elektronnyy resurs / URL: http://premier.gov.ru. Data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2014.
Filimonov A. E. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost za narushenie prav intellektual noy sobstvennosti: diss.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2006.
Frolova E.E., Voykova N.A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost kak sredstvo obespecheniya finansovoy bezopasnosti: trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk № 4/2015. M.: IGP RAN, 2015.
KHataeva M.A. Analiz sudebnoy praktiki privlecheniya k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za narushenie avtorskikh prav // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2009. № 3.
SHCHedrin N., Vostokov A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost yuridicheskikh lits ili inye mery ugolovno-pravovogo kharaktera v otnoshenii organizatsiy // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2009. № 1.
YAkovlev V.F. Ekonomika. Pravo. Sud. M., 2003.
Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik / Pod red. doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora E.A. Sukhanova. Tom I. M.: Volters Kluver, 2004.
Dvoretskiy M.YU. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost yuridicheskikh lits v zakonodatel stve Velikobritanii, SSHA i RF: problemy teorii i praktiki primeneniya // Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2011. № 4 (96).
Emel yanov A.S., CHernogor N.N. Finansovo-pravovaya otvetstvennost . M., 2004.
Kelina S.G. Eshche raz ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti yuridicheskikh lits // Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke. M., 2008.
Kolotyrkina S.I. Vidy otvetstvennosti v prave // Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk № 5/2013. M.: IGP RAN, 2013.
Kommentariy k kodeksu ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh / pod obshch. red. E. G. Lipatova, S. E. CHannova. M., 2007 Elektronnyy resurs / SPS Garant . Data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2014.
Lebed (Efremova) V.V. Avtorskoe pravo v pravovoy sisteme sovremennogo rossiyskogo gosudarstva: problemy terminologii // Aktual nye problemy chastnogo prava: trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk № 1 (53) 2016 / otv. red. A.G. Lisitsyn-Svetlanov. M., 2016.
Leyst O.E. Sanktsii i otvetstvennost po sovetskomu pravu. M., 1981.
Lokhbaum V. A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost za narushenie avtorskikh i smezhnykh prav: diss. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2008.
Podshibikhin L., Leont ev K. Produkty mul timedia: pravovye problemy i ekonomicheskie perspektivy // Intellektual naya sobstvennost . Avtorskie i smezhnye prava. 2002. № 9.
Sergeev A.P. Pravo intellektual noy sobstvennosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: uchebnik. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: TK Velbi, 2004.
Svechnikova I.V. Avtorskoe pravo: Uchebnoe posobie. M.: Dashkov i Ko, 2009.
Stenogramma programmy Razgovor s Vladimirom Putinym Elektronnyy resurs / URL: http://premier.gov.ru. Data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2014.
Filimonov A. E. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost za narushenie prav intellektual noy sobstvennosti: diss.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2006.
Frolova E.E., Voykova N.A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost kak sredstvo obespecheniya finansovoy bezopasnosti: trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk № 4/2015. M.: IGP RAN, 2015.
KHataeva M.A. Analiz sudebnoy praktiki privlecheniya k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za narushenie avtorskikh prav // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2009. № 3.
SHCHedrin N., Vostokov A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost yuridicheskikh lits ili inye mery ugolovno-pravovogo kharaktera v otnoshenii organizatsiy // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2009. № 1.
YAkovlev V.F. Ekonomika. Pravo. Sud. M., 2003.
Keywords:
administrative responsibility, copyright, copyright protection, the results of intellectual activity, counterfeit copies of works, the customs authorities.
