PROBLEMS OF LEGAL REGULATION OF CONTRACTS WITH UNFAIR CONDITIONS
( Pp. 150-153)

In the article the author poses the tasks of researching the concept of unfair terms of the contract, revealing signs of injustice of the terms of the contract, taking into account which the weak party will be protected from unfair actions of the counterparty. The author synthesizes ideas on the need to protect the weak side of the contract from the unfair terms of the contract, and justifies the need for judicial interference in contractual freedom in order to protect against formally legal, but unfair terms of the contract. The author proves that it is impossible to protect the weak side of the contract from unfair conditions, operating only with mandatory rules of law, due to the fact that, at least, there is a constant increase in the number of new contractual constructions, which, accordingly, generate new abuses of one of the parties to the treaty, As well as the blocking of an unfair contractual condition, should not be carried out a priori, by fixing in the rule of law the binding rules of conduct, but by applying the court's discretion on Means norms of art. 10 of the Civil Code, art. 169 Civil Code, art. 428 Civil Code, taking into account the specific circumstances of the case. The conclusions made in the article will be used to further develop practical mechanisms for protecting the weak side of contractual relations.

Surnina O.S., (2017), PROBLEMS OF LEGAL REGULATION OF CONTRACTS WITH UNFAIR CONDITIONS. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 2 => 150-153.

Bogdanov D.E. Voprosy dogovornoy spravedlivosti v otechestvennoy sudebnoy praktike// Rossiyskiy sud ya. 2012. № 12 S.33-36
Karapetov A.G., Fetisova E.M., Praktika primeneniya arbitrazhnymi sudami postanovleniya Plenuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 14 marta 2014 goda № 16 O Svobode dogovora i ee predelakh //Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2015. - N 12.
Kudina S.A., CHernova G.SH. Ponyatie potrebitel skikh dogovorov i ikh osobennosti // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve, -2014, №5: 84-88.
Novikov M.V. Mekhanizm zloupotrebleniya pravom // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve, -2016, № 8, S. 134-138.
Postanovlenie Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy federatsii № 16 O svobode dogovora i ee predelakh ot 14.03.2014 // Vestnik VAS RF. - May 2014. - № 5.
Postanovlenie FAS Volgo-Vyatskogo okruga ot 29.09.2006 № A43-3769/2006-23-60// Dostup iz SPS Konsul tantPlyus
Surnina O.S. Istoricheskoe stanovlenie pravovykh garantiy zashchity slaboy storony // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve, -2017, №2. S. 86-89.
TSvaygert K., Ketts KH. Sravnitel noe chastnoe pravo: V 2 t. Delikt: per. s nem. M., 2010 T 1. Osnovy. T.2 Dogovor. Neosnovatel noe obogashchenie. S. 328-329

unfair contract terms, dishonesty, the weak side, protection of the weaker party to the contract, the non-equivalence of contractual obligations, freedom of contract.