THE ISSUE OF MATURITY IN ARBITRATION COURT WITH THE APPLICATION ON DISPUTING NON-NORMATIVE LEGAL ACTS OF CONSTITUENT ENTITIES EXERCISING PUBLIC POWERS
( Pp. 156-158)

More about authors
Yaroshenko Yuliya O. aspirant
South-Russian Institute of management Russian Academy of national economy and public administration under the President of the Russian Federation
Abstract:
The article discusses the topical issue of the term of appeal to the court with the application on disputing non-normative legal act, decisions, acts or omissions of public authorities and officials in connection with his controversial nature. The author on the basis of systematic analysis of law and arbitration courts decisions on this category of cases comes to the conclusion about the need for changes in procedural law.
How to Cite:
Yaroshenko Y.O., (2018), THE ISSUE OF MATURITY IN ARBITRATION COURT WITH THE APPLICATION ON DISPUTING NON-NORMATIVE LEGAL ACTS OF CONSTITUENT ENTITIES EXERCISING PUBLIC POWERS. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 1 => 156-158.
Reference list:
Arbitrazhnyy protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24.07.2002 № 95-FZ (red. ot 29.07.2017) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2002. № 30. St. 3012.
Federal nyy zakon ot 07.05.1998 № 75-FZ (red. ot 26.07.2017) O negosudarstvennykh pensionnykh fondakh // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF.1998. № 19. St. 2071.
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 02.12.2013 № 1908-O Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby obshchestva s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost yu Stroitel naya kompaniya Stroy-Invest na narushenie konstitutsionnykh prav i svobod polozheniem chasti 4 stat i 198 Arbitrazhnogo protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii // http://www.pravo.gov.ru
Postanovlenie Devyatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 14 fevralya 2013 g. po delu № A40-116618/12 // SPS Konsul tantPlyus
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda resheniya AS Udmurtskoy Respubliki ot 05 iyulya 2017 g. po delu A71-6655/2017 // http://kad.arbitr.ru.
Alekhina S.A., Blazheev V.V., Bonner A.T. Arbitrazhnyy protsess: uchebnik. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. / Pod red. R.E. Gukasyana. M., 2008. S. 222.
Andreeva T.K. O srokakh obzhalovaniya resheniy organov i lits, osushchestvlyayushchikh publichnye funktsii // Arbitrazhnaya praktika. 2004. № 12. S. 58-60.
Novikov N.A. Primenenie sroka, ustanovlennogo chast yu 4 stat i 198 APK RF // Arbitrazhnaya praktika. 2004. № 10. S. 70. Arbitrazhnyy protsess. Uchebnik. Otv. red. prof. V. V. YArkov. M.: Volters Kluver, 2004. S. 388.
Prikhod ko I.A. Dostupnost pravosudiya v arbitrazhnom i grazhdanskom protsesse: osnovnye problemy. SPb., 2005. S. 436.
Sushkova S. A., Kolosova L.V. Primenenie sroka, ustanovlennogo chast yu 4 stat i 198 APK RF // Arbitrazhnaya praktika. 2004. № 8. S. 48.
Keywords:
time, non-normative legal act, the decision, action, officials, public authorities, challenging.