ARBITRATION MANAGERS: ACTUAL ASPECTS OF THE LEGAL POSITION
( Pp. 170-173)
More about authors
Milov Pavel O.
kandidat yuridicheskih nauk, docent kafedry upravleniya i grazhdanskogo prava, rukovoditel nauchno-issledovatelskogo otdela
ANO VO «Institute of business career»
ANO VO «Institute of business career»
Abstract:
Current political and economic problems in the Russian Federation, among other things, exacerbate the risks of insolvency and bankruptcy, which actualizes the task of optimizing the legal regulation of the status of arbitration management. The article offered directions of perfection of this institute: clarification of the requirements for the education and training of arbitration managers, the legal limits of their competence, requirements for membership and participation in their self-regulatory organizations, as well as the membership of these organizations in the (planned) national Association. The scientific article takes into account and critically comprehends the latest legislative innovations (including bills) on the status and functions of arbitration managers, their organizations and the planned national Association.
How to Cite:
Milov P.O., (2019), ARBITRATION MANAGERS: ACTUAL ASPECTS OF THE LEGAL POSITION. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 2 => 170-173.
Reference list:
Avdeev. S.E. Kommentariy k Federal nomu zakonu O nesostoyatel nosti (bankrotstve) . M., 2005. S. 67-68.
Belolikov A.I. Bankrotstvo kak sposob zashchity narushennykh prav: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. M.: 2005. 198 s.
Vakhaev M.KH. Diskussionnye voprosy chastnoy sobstvennosti na zemlyu v Rossii// ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2006. № 5 (113). S. 79-87.
Vladyka E.E. Vzaimodeystvie arbitrazhnogo upravlyayushchego i samoreguliruemoy organizatsii arbitrazhnykh upravlyayushchikh// Pravo i ekonomika. 2006. № 10. S. 56-60.
Glinchikova A.G. CHastnaya sobstvennost i obshchestvennyy interes - dilemma Rossii// Voprosy filosofii. 2011. № 3. S. 3-11.
Dorokhina E.G. CHlenstvo arbitrazhnogo upravlyayushchego v samoreguliruemoy organizatsii arbitrazhnykh upravlyayushchikh: pravo ili obyazannost // Zakonodatel stvo. 2006. № 11. S. 50-56.
Kalashnikova V.S. Problemnye aspekty trebovaniy, pred yavlyaemykh k arbitrazhnomu upravlyayushchemu// Sinergiya Nauk. 2018. T. 2. № 23. S. 37-45. Kommercheskoe pravo / Pod red. V.F. Popondopulo, V.F. YAkovlevoy. SPb., 1998. S. 77.
Kravchenko A.A. Ob otvetstvennosti za nedobrosovestnost v otnosheniyakh nesostoyatel nosti (bankrotstva) // Predprinimatel skoe pravo. 2015. № 2. S. 10-17.
Popondopulo V.F. Nekotorye problemy sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel stva o bankrotstve // ZHurnal predprinimatel skogo i korporativnogo prava. 2016. № 1. S. 44- 52.
Rusanov M.S. Institut arbitrazhnogo upravlyayushchego kak bazovyy institut konkursnogo prava// YUrisprudentsiya. 2010. Vyp. 18. № 2. S. 89-96.
Sarnakova A.V. Problemy opredeleniya kriteriev otbora arbitrazhnykh upravlyayushchikh i pravovogo obespecheniya prinyatiya imi mer po formirovaniyu konkursnoy massy // Bankovskoe pravo. 2017. № 1. S. 25-31.
Snachala upravlenie - den gi potom. Arbitrazhnym upravlyayushchim predlagayut reformu// Kommersant . 2018. 24 iyulya https://www.kommersant.ru/doc /3694965 query institut 20arbitrazhnykh 20upravlyayushchikh
Tkachev V. N. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy transgranichnoy nesostoyatel nosti// ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2007. №4 (124). S. 120-129.
Telyukina M.V. Konkursnoe pravo (teoriya i praktika nesostoyatel nosti (bankrotstva). M., 2002.
CHernikova L.V. Trebovaniya k arbitrazhnomu upravlyayushchemu: probely v zakonodatel stve i puti ikh ustraneniya// Izvestiya Tul skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. 2013. № 3-2. S. 234-238.
YAkokka Li Kar era menedzhera. M. 2001.
Belolikov A.I. Bankrotstvo kak sposob zashchity narushennykh prav: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. M.: 2005. 198 s.
Vakhaev M.KH. Diskussionnye voprosy chastnoy sobstvennosti na zemlyu v Rossii// ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2006. № 5 (113). S. 79-87.
Vladyka E.E. Vzaimodeystvie arbitrazhnogo upravlyayushchego i samoreguliruemoy organizatsii arbitrazhnykh upravlyayushchikh// Pravo i ekonomika. 2006. № 10. S. 56-60.
Glinchikova A.G. CHastnaya sobstvennost i obshchestvennyy interes - dilemma Rossii// Voprosy filosofii. 2011. № 3. S. 3-11.
Dorokhina E.G. CHlenstvo arbitrazhnogo upravlyayushchego v samoreguliruemoy organizatsii arbitrazhnykh upravlyayushchikh: pravo ili obyazannost // Zakonodatel stvo. 2006. № 11. S. 50-56.
Kalashnikova V.S. Problemnye aspekty trebovaniy, pred yavlyaemykh k arbitrazhnomu upravlyayushchemu// Sinergiya Nauk. 2018. T. 2. № 23. S. 37-45. Kommercheskoe pravo / Pod red. V.F. Popondopulo, V.F. YAkovlevoy. SPb., 1998. S. 77.
Kravchenko A.A. Ob otvetstvennosti za nedobrosovestnost v otnosheniyakh nesostoyatel nosti (bankrotstva) // Predprinimatel skoe pravo. 2015. № 2. S. 10-17.
Popondopulo V.F. Nekotorye problemy sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel stva o bankrotstve // ZHurnal predprinimatel skogo i korporativnogo prava. 2016. № 1. S. 44- 52.
Rusanov M.S. Institut arbitrazhnogo upravlyayushchego kak bazovyy institut konkursnogo prava// YUrisprudentsiya. 2010. Vyp. 18. № 2. S. 89-96.
Sarnakova A.V. Problemy opredeleniya kriteriev otbora arbitrazhnykh upravlyayushchikh i pravovogo obespecheniya prinyatiya imi mer po formirovaniyu konkursnoy massy // Bankovskoe pravo. 2017. № 1. S. 25-31.
Snachala upravlenie - den gi potom. Arbitrazhnym upravlyayushchim predlagayut reformu// Kommersant . 2018. 24 iyulya https://www.kommersant.ru/doc /3694965 query institut 20arbitrazhnykh 20upravlyayushchikh
Tkachev V. N. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy transgranichnoy nesostoyatel nosti// ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2007. №4 (124). S. 120-129.
Telyukina M.V. Konkursnoe pravo (teoriya i praktika nesostoyatel nosti (bankrotstva). M., 2002.
CHernikova L.V. Trebovaniya k arbitrazhnomu upravlyayushchemu: probely v zakonodatel stve i puti ikh ustraneniya// Izvestiya Tul skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. 2013. № 3-2. S. 234-238.
YAkokka Li Kar era menedzhera. M. 2001.
