CIVIL-LEGAL PROBLEMS OF SELF-PROTECTION AS A FORM OF CONSUMER PROTECTION
( Pp. 195-201)

More about authors
Obraztsova Valentina I. aspirant kafedry grazhdanskogo prava
the Moscow state law University named after O. E. Kutafin (MSLA)
Abstract:
Background. The main purpose of the study is to study the use of self-protection of the right of the consumer in case of violation of the contract by the counterparty by analyzing the current legislation and law enforcement practice. The author solves such problems as the identification of problems of forms of consumer protection, justification of proportionality to the violation of the right of self-protection methods, identification of shortcomings and advantages of the existing legal regulation of consumer self-protection, the need for comprehensive revision to include provisions on self-protection in the law «On protection of consumer rights». Methodology and methods. In this article general scientific methods of cognition were used: dialectical, methods of analysis and synthesis, analogy, abstraction and concretization, narrative method, as well as special legal methods: comparative legal, technical and legal analysis, legal modeling, etc. Results and conclusions. The author concludes that the justification for the proportionality of the violation of the right of self-defense methods and the need to modernize the modern legislation with the definition of the list of ways of self-protection by the consumer of their rights. The importance of amendments to the Law of RF "On protection of consumer rights" in terms of self-protection of the right as a form of protection of consumer rights. Research framework / a possibility of the subsequent use of results of scientific work. The author noted the fact that offered correction of contents of the Law of the RF "On protection of consumer rights" regarding self-defense right as a form of protection of the rights of consumers couldn’t be considered as the exhaustive mean solving the problems in the discussed sphere, however it makes a certain contribution to overcoming of them as reserves for development of further improvement of legislative bases, including the introduction of mechanisms of self-regulation. A priority in this case is not accelerated, but step development of the realized innovations, their approbation taking into account monitoring of legal practice. Practical value of results and their subsequent use. The results of the analysis of problems of self-defense presented in the article as forms of consumer protection and improvement of legal bases of their regulation can be used for further research and development of the designated aspects in the theory and also are put into practice by a wide range of persons taking into account the social importance of consumer protection. Social consequences. Forms of consumer protection are of exceptional social importance for each state. Contractual relations to meet citizens ' needs and, especially, in food, clothing, housing, goods, cultural and household purposes, works and services, etc., are directly related to the fact that their satisfaction is a necessary condition for human existence. Scientific novelty / originality of a research. The originality and novelty of the author's article is that it reveals the advantages and disadvantages of legal regulation of consumer self-protection of the right in case of violation of the contract by the counterparty, proposes draft amendments to the legislation in this area.
How to Cite:
Obraztsova V.I., (2018), CIVIL-LEGAL PROBLEMS OF SELF-PROTECTION AS A FORM OF CONSUMER PROTECTION. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 5 => 195-201.
Reference list:
Artemov I.I. O neobkhodimosti zaprosa dopolnitel nykh garantiy pri nalichii osnovaniy predpolagat , chto kontragent ne ispolnit obyazatel stvo v ustanovlennyy srok // Biznes v zakone. 2015. № 2. S. 103-106.
Bogdanova E.E. Formy i sposoby zashchity grazhdanskikh prav i interesov // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2003. № 6. S. 39-45.
Vershinin A.P. Sposoby zashchity grazhdanskikh prav v sude. Diss.. d-ra yurid. nauk v forme nauch. doklada: 12.00.03. SPb., 1998. 56 c.
Grazhdanskoe pravo: Uchebnik. V 3 ch. CH. 1. / Pod red. A.P. Sergeeva, YU.K. Tolstogo. M.: Teis, 1997. 600 s.
Gribanov V.P. Predely osushchestvleniya i zashchity grazhdanskikh prav. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1972. 284 c.
Karkhalev D.N. Mery operativnogo vozdeystviya v grazhdanskom prave // Rossiyskiy sud ya. 2009. № 4. S.16-19
Sverdlyk G.A., Strauning E.L. Zashchita i samozashchita grazhdanskikh prav: Uchebnoe posobie. M.: Leks-kniga, 2002. 208 c.
Sovetskoe grazhdanskoe pravo: Uchebnik. V 2 t. T. 1 / Pod red. O.A. Krasavchikova. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1985. 520 s.
Stoyakin G.YA. Mery zashchity v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave. Diss.. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03. Sverdlovsk, 1973. 180 s.
YUzhanin N.V. Samozashchita grazhdanskikh prav: voprosy teorii // YUrist. 2015. № 19. S.17-22.
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Stavropol skogo kraevogo suda № 33-1228/2015 ot 24 fevralya 2015 g. // SPS Konsul tant Plyus. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc base SOSK n 33793 dst 4294967295 (data obrashcheniya: 27.07.2018)
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Kostromskogo oblastnogo suda po delu № 33-1141/2011 ot 01.08.2011 g. // SPS Konsul tant Plyus. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc base SOCN n 222630 dst 4294967295 (data obrashcheniya: 27.07.2018)
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF N 92-O-O ot 21.02.2008 g. // Elektronnaya biblioteka Sudebnoy sistemy RF. URL: http://sudbiblioteka.ru/ks/docdelo ks/konstitut big 5415.htm (data obrashcheniya: 27.07.2018)
Opredelenie Nizhegorodskogo oblastnogo suda ot 14.05.2013 g. po delu № 33-3962/2013 // SPS Konsul tantPlyus. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc base SOPV n 131080 dst 4294967295 (data obrashcheniya: 27.07.2018)
Petrushkin V.A. Aktual nye problemy pravovoy modeli sistemy oborota nedvizhimosti: monografiya / nauch. red. V.V. Vitryanskiy. M.: Statut, 2014. 285 c.
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma YAroslavskogo oblastnogo suda N 44-g-113 ot 21.09.2005 g. // Resheniya i postanovleniya sudov RF. URL: http://www.resheniya-sudov.ru/2007/44212/ (data obrashcheniya: 27.07.2018)
Uzdimaeva N.I. Printsipy pravovoy samozashchity: ponyatie, sistema, soderzhanie // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2018. № 4. S. 89-92.