COUNTER-SANCTIONS AND «ECONOMIC WARS»: A POSITIVE VECTOR FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND QUASI-ECONOMIC ACTIVITY?
( Pp. 124-126)

The aim of the article is to study the causes and consequences of an increasingly widespread position, according to which the regime of counter-sanctions and economic wars can be identified with the positive prospects of entrepreneurial and, in general, economic activity. To achieve this goal, the works of both domestic and foreign civilists were used (Israel Kirzner, McCain Scott, Armentano Dominic, etc.) The results of the study are the substantiation of the judgment that the development of modern business law requires the formation of a theory of «quasi-entrepreneurial» activity, the essence and specificity of which are described in this article. The practical significance of the work may be due to its use in the process of legalizing the institution of retortions, «packages of anti-sanction measures», etc. The author expresses the hope that the totality of this kind of doctrinal positions, provided they are multiplied in the scientific community and perceived by the authorities, can actualize the negative perception of the phenomenon of «economic egoism» of modern states. The identification of the relationship of this phenomenon with the forms of correlation of entrepreneurial, economic and quasi-economic activity, which is rarely taken into account in legislative and law enforcement processes, confirms the originality of the presented article.

Sergey G.P., (2019), COUNTER-SANCTIONS AND «ECONOMIC WARS»: A POSITIVE VECTOR FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND QUASI-ECONOMIC ACTIVITY?. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 5 => 124-126.

Denisov S.A. Mnimye konstitutsionnye tsennosti // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal noe pravo. 2018. № 10. S. 9-15.
Kvacheva P.I., Petrova S.V. Politiko-pravovoy status nepriznannogo gosudarstva v sovremennom mire: istoriko-pravovoy aspekt (na primere Respubliki Abkhaziya) // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. YUridicheskie nauki. 2017. № 1. S. 56-65.
Tolstykh V.L. Printsipial noe soprotivlenie resheniyam Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka v svete kriticheskoy teorii // Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie. 2018. № 1. S. 79-89.
SHCHekin D.M. Balans chastnykh i publichnykh interesov i bor ba s nalogovymi zloupotrebleniyami v sovremennoy Rossii // Zakon. 2018. № 11. S. 32-43.

entrepreneurship, state, law, regulation, economy, sanction.