Alternative Ways of Fixing Evidence in the Information and Telecommunications Network «Internet» in Cases of Protection of the Business Reputation of a Legal Entity in Arbitration Courts
( Pp. 89-93)
More about authors
Bychkov Sergey V.
graduate student
The Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Moscow, Russian Federation
The Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Moscow, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The purpose of the research. In the conditions of comprehensive informatization of society, the main array of untrue and defamatory information about a legal entity is distributed in the information and telecommunications network «Internet». The information disseminated in the information network must be recorded in accordance with the Arbitration Procedural Code of the Russian Federation in order for the court to accept them as admissible evidence. As a rule, those involved in the case of protecting the business reputation of a legal entity use such methods of fixation as printing out a web page (screenshot) or a notarial inspection of the site. However, evidence-fixing services are currently gaining popularity. The purpose of this study is to consider alternative ways of fixing evidence on the Internet and to identify the features of their functioning. Methods such as analysis, synthesis, formal legal and others were used to conduct the research. Results. The results obtained allow us to conclude that alternative methods of fixing evidence using automated systems and an online resource have great potential for forming an evidence base in cases of protection of business reputation in arbitration courts. At the moment, these methods of fixing evidence are already used in law enforcement practice.
How to Cite:
Bychkov S.V., (2022), ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF FIXING EVIDENCE IN THE INFORMATION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK «INTERNET» IN CASES OF PROTECTION OF THE BUSINESS REPUTATION OF A LEGAL ENTITY IN ARBITRATION COURTS. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 4 => 89-93.
Reference list:
Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation of July 24, 2002 No. 95-FZ // Rossiyskaya Gazeta. No. 137. 07/27/2002.
Fundamentals of the legislation of the Russian Federation on notaries, approved. Armed Forces of the Russian Federation 11.02.1993 No. 4462-1.
Bespalova I.V. The specifics of the Internet as an information and communication environment // Sociological Sciences. 2017. No. 6 (60). pp. 80-85.
Bicherova A.D. Protecting the business reputation of a legal entity on the Internet: problems of legal regulation // Justice. 2018. No. 3. P. 15-21.
Gavrilov E.V. Protection of business reputation from defamation on Internet forums [Text] // Law in the Internet: Collection of articles / hands. ed. count and rev. ed. d. y. n. M.A. Rozhkov. M.: Statut, 2018. P. 457-475.
Kotlyarova V.V. On the problems of legal regulation of electronic evidence in the civil process // Arbitration and civil process. 2019. No. 6. P. 37-42.
Course of evidence law: Civil process. arbitration process. Administrative legal proceedings / S.F. Afanasiev, O.V. Baulin, I.N. Lukyanova and others; ed. M.A. Fokina. 2nd ed., revised. and additional M.: Statute, 2019. -656 p.
Mostovoy G.I., Kharin V.I. Possibilities of using publicly available information from the Whois service in civil, arbitration and administrative proceedings // Issues of Russian Justice. 2020. No. 9. P. 1230-1241.
Features of arbitration proceedings: Study.-Pract. allowance / O.V. Aboznova, Yu.V. Averkov, N.G. Belyaeva and others; Ed. I.V. Reshetnikova. M.: Justice, 2019. P. 95-96 (the author of chapter 6 is E.N. Serditova).
Reshetnikova I.V. Evidence in civil proceedings. M., 2010. -503 p.
Shevtsov P.V., Misnik L.N. Protecting the business reputation of legal entities on the Internet: practical aspects // Defense-industrial complex: issues of law. 2020. No. 4. P. 87-95.
Yuzefovich V.B. Evidence and proof in the arbitration process: analysis of law enforcement practice. Judicial lawyer's conclusions. M.: Infotropic Media, 2012. P. 63-64.
Sedykh E.I. Ways of fixing evidence for the court: pros and cons // Information and legal portal «Zakon.ru». URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2020/01/16/sposoby_fiksacii_dokazatelstv_dlya_suda_plyusy_i_minusy/ (date of access: 05/21/2022).
Sedykh E.I. Methods for fixing Internet evidence // Internet edition vc.ru. https://vc.ru/legal/102194-sposoby-fiksacii-internet-dokazatelstv-plyusy-i-minusy (date of access: 05/21/2022).
Service for online recording of evidence on the Internet «screenshot.legal». URL: https://screenshot.legal/ (date of access: 05/19/2022).
Judicial statistics of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. URL: https://vsrf.ru/documents/statistics/ / (date of access: 05/15/2022).
Service for fixing evidence on the Internet «WebJustice». URL: https://www.webjustice.ru/ (date of access: 05/19/2022).
Fundamentals of the legislation of the Russian Federation on notaries, approved. Armed Forces of the Russian Federation 11.02.1993 No. 4462-1.
Bespalova I.V. The specifics of the Internet as an information and communication environment // Sociological Sciences. 2017. No. 6 (60). pp. 80-85.
Bicherova A.D. Protecting the business reputation of a legal entity on the Internet: problems of legal regulation // Justice. 2018. No. 3. P. 15-21.
Gavrilov E.V. Protection of business reputation from defamation on Internet forums [Text] // Law in the Internet: Collection of articles / hands. ed. count and rev. ed. d. y. n. M.A. Rozhkov. M.: Statut, 2018. P. 457-475.
Kotlyarova V.V. On the problems of legal regulation of electronic evidence in the civil process // Arbitration and civil process. 2019. No. 6. P. 37-42.
Course of evidence law: Civil process. arbitration process. Administrative legal proceedings / S.F. Afanasiev, O.V. Baulin, I.N. Lukyanova and others; ed. M.A. Fokina. 2nd ed., revised. and additional M.: Statute, 2019. -656 p.
Mostovoy G.I., Kharin V.I. Possibilities of using publicly available information from the Whois service in civil, arbitration and administrative proceedings // Issues of Russian Justice. 2020. No. 9. P. 1230-1241.
Features of arbitration proceedings: Study.-Pract. allowance / O.V. Aboznova, Yu.V. Averkov, N.G. Belyaeva and others; Ed. I.V. Reshetnikova. M.: Justice, 2019. P. 95-96 (the author of chapter 6 is E.N. Serditova).
Reshetnikova I.V. Evidence in civil proceedings. M., 2010. -503 p.
Shevtsov P.V., Misnik L.N. Protecting the business reputation of legal entities on the Internet: practical aspects // Defense-industrial complex: issues of law. 2020. No. 4. P. 87-95.
Yuzefovich V.B. Evidence and proof in the arbitration process: analysis of law enforcement practice. Judicial lawyer's conclusions. M.: Infotropic Media, 2012. P. 63-64.
Sedykh E.I. Ways of fixing evidence for the court: pros and cons // Information and legal portal «Zakon.ru». URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2020/01/16/sposoby_fiksacii_dokazatelstv_dlya_suda_plyusy_i_minusy/ (date of access: 05/21/2022).
Sedykh E.I. Methods for fixing Internet evidence // Internet edition vc.ru. https://vc.ru/legal/102194-sposoby-fiksacii-internet-dokazatelstv-plyusy-i-minusy (date of access: 05/21/2022).
Service for online recording of evidence on the Internet «screenshot.legal». URL: https://screenshot.legal/ (date of access: 05/19/2022).
Judicial statistics of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. URL: https://vsrf.ru/documents/statistics/ / (date of access: 05/15/2022).
Service for fixing evidence on the Internet «WebJustice». URL: https://www.webjustice.ru/ (date of access: 05/19/2022).
Keywords:
protection of the business reputation of a legal entity, methods of fixing evidence, printout of a web page (screenshot), notarial inspection of the site.
Related Articles
