Social and Labor Guarantees for Families with Children as the Basis of the State's Family Policy
( Pp. 147-154)

Task. The author of the article set himself the task of analyzing the social and labor guarantees provided by the state to families with children. Model. To solve this problem, it is necessary to investigate the social purpose of support measures in relation to children, families with children, to investigate the grounds for their provision. Conclusions. The system of social and labor measures is aimed at providing comprehensive support to families with children, helping to protect the labor and social rights of citizens. Research framework. Limited by relations in the sphere of social, labor and family law of the Russian Federation. Practical value. A systematic analysis of measures to help and support families with children, issues of protecting women - mothers allow us to systematize the prerequisites for the birth of children, to determine the incentives and obstacles to the birth of a child. Social implications. Determination of the purpose of support measures for families with children, analysis of individual types of assistance will determine the relationship and interdependence of social, labor and family-type norms, the effective interaction of which will ensure the basic needs of each family. Originality, value. The systematic study and research of social assistance measures, the study of labor guarantees for women with children makes it possible to assess the effectiveness of the state's family policy, to identify shortcomings and gaps in the country's social system. An analysis of the norms of the diverse legislation of the Russian Federation makes it possible to identify additional guarantees for children and families with children, for working women.

Letova N.V., (2021), SOCIAL AND LABOR GUARANTEES FOR FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN AS THE BASIS OF THE STATE'S FAMILY POLICY. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 5 => 147-154.

Troshkina I.N., Smolina I.G. - State family policy as the basis for the functioning of a modern family (regional aspect) // Sociodynamics. - 2019. - No. 11. - P. 20-43.
Fedotova Yu.G. Implementation of measures of administrative and public provision of social protection of citizens in conditions of high alert // Social and Pension Law. 2020.N 3.P. 3-7.
Chkhutiashvili L.V. The main directions of the implementation of the new family policy of the state // Actual problems of Russian law. 2017.N 5.P. 46-49.
Letova N.V. Fundamentals of protection of motherhood, childhood, family in the light of the novellas of the Constitution of the Russian Federation // Gaps in Russian legislation. No. 1. 2021. P. 34-40.
Spano R. The Future of the European Court of Human Rights - Subsidiarity, Process - Based Review and the Rule of Law // Human Rights Law Review, September 2018. Vol. 18. Iss. 3. P. 473 - 494.
Stynska V. Social and pedagogical support of maternal and children s health care in foreign countries at the beginning of the 20th century / V. Stynska // European applied sciences. - 2013. - 10. -Vol. 1. - S. 69 - 71.
Gauthier A. The State and the Family. A Comparative Analysis of Family Policies in Industrialized Countries. Clarendon Press. - Oxford, 1996. - S. 172.
Zakharov S. V. Russian Federation: From the first to second demographic transition // Demographic research. 2008. Vol. 19.R. 907-972.
Olah L. Gendering fertility: Second births in Sweden and Hungary Population Research and Policy Review - April 2003, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 171-200
Serkin V.P. Delayed life neurosis // Bulletin of the Northern International University. Issue 1. - 2003 .-- S. 131 - 136.
Safina A.S. A short scenario of a postponed life: a maternity scenario // Personality in extreme conditions and crisis situations of life. 2019.No. 9.P. 80-86.
Botev N. Could Pronatalist Policies Discourage Childbearing // Population and Development Review. 2015. Vol. 41, No. 2. P. 301-314.
Starodubova U.M., Igolnikova V.A. Labor guarantees for employees when granting maternity leave // Alley of Science. 2018.Vol. 6.No. 10 (26). S. 810-814.
Matveeva T.P., Kuznetsova N.A., Pavlovskaya Yu.V. Comparative legal analysis of the system of social support for mothers and children in Russia and abroad // Questions of Russian and international law. 2018.Vol. 8.No. 12A. S. 65-73.
Chernova E.V. Theoretical aspects of economometric modeling of women's employment in modern Russia // Izvestia SFedU. Technical science. 2012. No. 6 (131). S. 199-202.
Henderson A. Shrinking welfare states? Comparing maternity leave benefits and child care programs in European Union and North American welfare states, 1985-2000 / A. Henderson L. White // Journal of European Public Policy - 2004 - Volume 11, Issue 3.
El-Sibai N.M., Ganebnykh E.V. Moms are entrepreneurs: the reasons for female self-employment and hidden potential // Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. 2019.Vol. 9.No. 4.P. 541-556.
Busygin VP, Kulakov DA Comparative efficiency of family benefits in European countries // World of Economics and Management. 2016.Vol. 16, No. 3. P. 42-56.
Pishnyak A.I., Nadezhdina E.V. Employment of Russian women after childbirth: incentives and barriers // Journal of Social Policy Research. 2020.Vol. 18.No. 2.P. 221-238.
Kostenko E.P., Kuznetsova S.Yu. Tools for overcoming gender inequality in the workplace: the experience of France // Journal of Economic Regulation. 2019.Vol. 10.No. 4.P. 103-116.
Arkhangelsky V. A woman is not on maternity leave, she is working. Demographic Journal. 2017. No. 4 (4). S. 16-19.

family, family policy, measures of social support for families with children, family protection and protection, employee, labor guarantees, right to work, traditional family values, demography, poverty, the well-being of the citizen, child benefits, maternity leave, Holiday to care for the child, maternal capital, the concept of social and economic development, targeted assistance to the family, comprehensive support for families with children.