FEATURES OF COMPENSATION TO THE ARBITRATION MANAGER IN THE CASE OF INSOLVENCY (BANKRUPTCY)
( Pp. 258-260)
More about authors
Polyakov Dmitry V.
yurist po soprovozhdeniyu procedur bankrotstva
BankrotConsult ltd
BankrotConsult ltd
Abstract:
Objective: to determine the specifics of compensation of the remuneration to the manager of the insolvency (bankruptcy) case of the organization under conditions when, according to the procedure for declaring the organization insolvent (bankrupt), the property was not enough to pay the remuneration. Conclusions: the key feature of reimbursement to an insolvency (bankruptcy) manager in an organization when, according to the procedure of declaring an organization insolvent (bankrupt), the property was not enough to pay the remuneration, there is an evidence base of intentional harm to the organization’s creditors and interested parties. Depending on the presence or absence of an evidence base, the responsibility for the remuneration of the manager in the case falls on the head of the organization as a subsidiary liability, or on the claimant, who, including may be the executive authority of the state. Practical value: the findings obtained in the article can be used by practising lawyers in examining insolvency (bankruptcy) cases of organizations. Originality: the latest court practice on the issue under consideration is analyzed, issues of relevance to the organization’s insolvency (bankruptcy) in the context of the economic crisis are raised.
How to Cite:
Polyakov D.V., (2019), FEATURES OF COMPENSATION TO THE ARBITRATION MANAGER IN THE CASE OF INSOLVENCY (BANKRUPTCY). Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 3 => 258-260.
Reference list:
Voskanyan R.O. Prognozirovanie stoimosti innovatsionnoy kompanii s ispol zovaniem real nogo optsiona v usloviyakh nestabil nogo razvitiya ekonomiki // Finansovyy biznes. 2015. № 5 (178). S. 38-42.
Drozdov V.YU. Sovremennye tendentsii prestupnosti, svyazannoy s nedruzhestvennymi pogloshcheniyami predpriyatiy (reyderstvom) // Obrazovanie. Nauka. Nauchnye kadry. 2017. № 6. S. 46-51.
Arbitrazhnyy protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24.07.2002 № 95-FZ (red. ot 25.12.2018) // SZ RF. 2002. № 30. St. 3012.
Federal nyy zakon ot 26.10.2002 № 127-FZ (red. ot 27.12.2018) O nesostoyatel nosti (bankrotstve) // SZ RF. 2002. № 4. St. 4190.
SHtykina A. Konstitutsionnyy sud utochnil prava nalogovikov v delakh o bankrotstve. - URL: https://www.vedomosti.ru /economics/articles.
CHuprova A.YU. Otvetstvennost za prestupleniya v sfere bankrotstva v Anglii // Biznes v zakone. 2006. № 3-4. S. 56-60.
Voskanyan R.O. Ekonomicheskaya sushchnost vrazhdebnogo pogloshcheniya organizatsii // Ekonomika: teoriya i praktika. 2018. № 1 (49). S. 21-25.
SHvedov A.A. Subsidiarnaya otvetstvennost rukovoditelya dolzhnika kak sposob zashchity prav kreditorov // Sud ya. 2018. № 4. S. 36-41.
Ob emy i chastota iskov o subsidiarnoy otvetstvennosti pri bankrotstve kompaniy b yut rekordy / Edinyy federal nyy reestr yuridicheski znachimykh svedeniy o faktakh deyatel nosti yuridicheskikh lits, individual nykh predprinimateley i inykh sub ektov ekonomicheskoy deyatel nosti (Fedresurs). - URL: https://fedresurs.ru /news/5b48d5e4-7bc2-4ce5-b6b8-557df4978342.
Drozdov V.YU. Sovremennye tendentsii prestupnosti, svyazannoy s nedruzhestvennymi pogloshcheniyami predpriyatiy (reyderstvom) // Obrazovanie. Nauka. Nauchnye kadry. 2017. № 6. S. 46-51.
Arbitrazhnyy protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24.07.2002 № 95-FZ (red. ot 25.12.2018) // SZ RF. 2002. № 30. St. 3012.
Federal nyy zakon ot 26.10.2002 № 127-FZ (red. ot 27.12.2018) O nesostoyatel nosti (bankrotstve) // SZ RF. 2002. № 4. St. 4190.
SHtykina A. Konstitutsionnyy sud utochnil prava nalogovikov v delakh o bankrotstve. - URL: https://www.vedomosti.ru /economics/articles.
CHuprova A.YU. Otvetstvennost za prestupleniya v sfere bankrotstva v Anglii // Biznes v zakone. 2006. № 3-4. S. 56-60.
Voskanyan R.O. Ekonomicheskaya sushchnost vrazhdebnogo pogloshcheniya organizatsii // Ekonomika: teoriya i praktika. 2018. № 1 (49). S. 21-25.
SHvedov A.A. Subsidiarnaya otvetstvennost rukovoditelya dolzhnika kak sposob zashchity prav kreditorov // Sud ya. 2018. № 4. S. 36-41.
Ob emy i chastota iskov o subsidiarnoy otvetstvennosti pri bankrotstve kompaniy b yut rekordy / Edinyy federal nyy reestr yuridicheski znachimykh svedeniy o faktakh deyatel nosti yuridicheskikh lits, individual nykh predprinimateley i inykh sub ektov ekonomicheskoy deyatel nosti (Fedresurs). - URL: https://fedresurs.ru /news/5b48d5e4-7bc2-4ce5-b6b8-557df4978342.
