IMPROVEMENT OF LEGAL REGULATION OF THE PROBLEMS OF APPLICATION OF MEASURES OF STATE PROTECTION OF PERSONS PROMOTING PRODUCTION ON CRIMINAL CASE
( Pp. 196-199)

More about authors
Radzhabov Radzhab O. applicant of department of criminal procedure and criminalistics
Dagestan state university
For read the full article, please, register or log in
Abstract:
Task: The protection of participants in the Russian criminal process is an important part of the process of proving and achieving its goal. In addition to the actual criminal procedural measures of protection, it is possible to apply extra-procedural measures, which are provided for by Federal Law № 119-FZ of August 20, 2004 «On State Protection of Victims, Witnesses and Other Participants in Criminal Proceedings». This law establishes a list of security measures involving the use of specific prerequisites, which include grounds and grounds. In this regard, a special task is the elimination of legal contradictions aimed at improving the reasons for the application of state protection measures to persons who contribute to justice. Methodology: During the research, the author used various methods: induction, deduction, generalization, abstraction, prediction, modeling, functional-structural analysis, and systematic and logical methods. Conclusions: In the course of the study, the following conclusions were drawn: 1. It is recommended to exclude the need to obtain the consent of guardianship and trusteeship bodies for the application of security measures in the absence of a written application of a minor protected person. 2. It is proposed to supplement the title of article 16 with the following wording: «Reasons and basis for the application of security measures». Taking into account the fact that the reasons are primary, and the basis - secondary, change the order of the parts of Art. 16: Part 2 of Art. 16 to move to part 1, and part 1 - to part 2. Thus, in part 1 the reasons will be listed, and in part 2 - the ground. 3. It is expedient to formulate the content of Part 2 of Art. 16 of the current Law of August 20, 2004 № 119-FZ as follows: «In the absence of a written application of the protected person (close relatives, relatives or close persons), as well as against minors - parents, persons substituting for them .... The official of the competent authority has the right to personally decide on the application of security measures subject to the consent of the protected person». The possibility of subsequent use: The obtained results can be used to improve the legislation of the Russian Federation with regard to the application of security measures provided for in Federal Law № 119-FZ of August 20, 2004 (as amended on 07.02.2017) «On State Protection of Victims, Witnesses and Other Participants in Criminal Proceedings»; continuation of scientific research in the field of ensuring the safety of protected persons in a criminal case. The practical significance of the results obtained is expressed in the possibility of using them in forensic investigation. Social significance: The results obtained are aimed at optimizing the legislative regulation of the application of personal security measures in relation to persons participating in criminal proceedings. The value of the results obtained is due to the presence in it of posing a problem that is essential for improving the level of protection of victims, witnesses and other persons assisting justice.
How to Cite:
Radzhabov R.O., (2018), IMPROVEMENT OF LEGAL REGULATION OF THE PROBLEMS OF APPLICATION OF MEASURES OF STATE PROTECTION OF PERSONS PROMOTING PRODUCTION ON CRIMINAL CASE. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 4: 196-199.
Reference list:
Dmitrieva A.A. K voprosu o soderzhanii teoreticheskoy modeli bezopasnogo uchastiya lichnosti v rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Vestnik Krasnodarskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2017. № 1(35). S. 44-48.
Epikhin A.YU. Zashchita zakonnykh prav i interesov svidetelya v ugolovnom protsesse: avtoref. dis..kand. yurid. nauk. Moskva, 1995.
Epikhin A.YU. Institut bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa: sravnitel nyy analiz zakonodatel stva zarubezhnykh stran // Aktual nye problemy ekonomiki i prava. 2008. № 1. S. 139-145.
Epikhin A.YU. K voprosu o bezopasnosti zashchishchaemykh lits v ugolovnom protsesse // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2002. № 2. S. 14-15.
Epikhin A.YU. Povody i osnovaniya primeneniya i realizatsii mer bezopasnosti zashchishchaemykh lits v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Vestnik Komi respublikanskoy akademii gosudarstvennoy sluzhby i upravleniya. Seriya: Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2004. № 7. S. 4-11.
Epikhin A.YU., Mishin A.V. Kontrol i zapis telefonnykh i inykh peregovorov kak mera obespecheniya bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva (v poryadke ch. 2 st. 186 UPK RF) // Deyatel nost organov vnutrennikh del po obespecheniyu bezopasnosti lits, podlezhashchikh gosudarstvennoy zashchite v sovremennykh usloviyakh: voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2016. № 3. S. 17-20.
Zaytsev O.A. K voprosu o primenenii ugolovno-protsessual nykh mer bezopasnosti // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2012. № 2. S. 37-38.
Zaytsev O.A. Kommentariy k st. 11 Okhrana prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2002. № 2.
Zaytsev O.A. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye akty, reguliruyushchie gosudarstvennuyu zashchitu uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa // Sotsium. 1999. № 2. S. 51.
Zaytsev O.A., Epikhin A.YU., Mishin A.V. Problemy implementatsii mezhdunarodnogo opyta bezopasnosti uchastnikov rossiyskogo ugolovnogo protsessa // Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya. 2018. № 2. S. 3-7.
Satdinov L.V. Osnovaniya primeneniya mer bezopasnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Deyatel nost organov vnutrennikh del po obespecheniyu bezopasnosti lits, podlezhashchikh gosudarstvennoy zashchite v sovremennykh usloviyakh: voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2016. № 3. S. 317-320.
SHCHerba S., Zaytsev O., Sarsenbaev T. Poterpevshiy v bespomoshchnom sostoyanii: osobennosti sudebnogo razbiratel stva // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 1995. № 9. S. 20.
SHCHerba S.P., Zaytsev O.A. Kak obespechit bezopasnost uchastnikov protsessa // Vestnik MVD Rossii. 1993. № 5. S. 24.