CORPORATE CONTROL AS A COMPLEX LEGAL BOND AND ITS IMPORTANCE FOR INCREASING THE INVESTMENT ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE RUSSIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IN THE CONTEXT OF LARGE-SCALE CIVIL LAW REFORM
( Pp. 105-109)

Introduction: the role of corporations in modern society is difficult to overestimate, because from the very beginning of the XXI century corporations become the main participants of the world economy and acquire a transnational character. Objective: the author of this article considers as a problem the comparison of economic power in the sphere of corporate control with the power of the creditor over the debtor in the legal relationship. Model: the research used such methods as General scientific dialectical, universal scientific methods (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, comparison, formal-logical, system-structural), special-legal methods (comparative-legal, method of system interpretation). Results: the essence of participation is expressed through a complex legal relationship that arises between the Corporation and its participant. At the same time, the active position in this legal relationship belongs, of course, to the participant of the Corporation, which is associated with the implementation of those legal opportunities that are given to the participant of the Corporation by virtue of its legal status. Conclusion: recognizing the timeliness and importance of making appropriate changes to the civil law in terms of fixing the rules of paragraph 3 of article 65.2 of the Civil Code, we note that the phrase «restoration of corporate control» is firmly established as a scientific civil turnover, and in judicial practice, is still missing in the Civil Code, which, in our opinion, should be recognized as a omission of the legislator. In this regard, we propose to Supplement the art. 12 the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in such way of protection of civil rights as restoration of corporate control that will allow to solve a number of fundamental tasks: to give to this method of protection of civil rights corporate identity, to distinguish it from adjacent ways of protection of civil rights, to enter the term «restoration of corporate control» in a normative definitive number that, as a consequence, will promote harmonization of the Russian corporate legislation, bringing it in line with generally recognized international standards in this area and increasing the investment attractiveness of the Russian legal system as a whole.

Zakharkina A.V., (2018), CORPORATE CONTROL AS A COMPLEX LEGAL BOND AND ITS IMPORTANCE FOR INCREASING THE INVESTMENT ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE RUSSIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IN THE CONTEXT OF LARGE-SCALE CIVIL LAW REFORM. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 4 => 105-109.

Aleshchev I. O kontseptsii vosstanovleniya korporativnogo kontrolya // EZH-YUrist. 2008. № 36. S. 12.
Aleshchev I. O razvitii kontseptsii korporativnogo kontrolya // Korporativnye spory. 2009. № 3. S. 46-52.
Afanas eva E.G., Bashkinskas V.YU., Gubin E.P. Korporativnoe pravo: Uchebnik dlya studentov vuzov, obuchayushchikhsya po napravleniyu YUrisprudentsiya / Otv. red. I.S. SHitkina. M.: Volters Kluver, 2007. 648 s.
Belykh V.S. O korporatsii, korporativnykh otnosheniyakh i korporativnom prave // Biznes, menedzhment i pravo. 2006. № 2 (11). S. 54-60.
Valeeva A.A. K voprosu o korporativnom kontrole i ego vosstanovlenii // YUrist. 2015. № 14. S. 39-46.
Vinogradov O., Noskova R. Vosstanovlenie korporativnogo kontrolya // EZH-YUrist. 2013. № 39. S. 15.
Gabov A.V. Obshchestva s ogranichennoy i dopolnitel noy otvetstvennost yu v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. M.: Statut, 2010. 253 s.
Gutin A.S. Korporativnyy kontrol v aktsionernykh obshchestvakh i ego pravovye formy: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Perm , 2005. 235 s.
Gutnikov O.V. K voprosu o pravovoy prirode sub ektivnogo korporativnogo prava // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2017. № 3. S. 54-65.
Zolotareva A.B., Kireeva A.V. K voprosu o tselesoobraznosti deleniya organizatsiy na korporativnye i unitarnye // YUrist. 2015. № 15. S. 29-34.
Kaminka A.I. Aktsionernye kompanii. YUridicheskoe issledovanie. SPb.: Tipo-lit. A.E. Landau, 1902. T. 1. 512 s.
Lavrov M.V. Risk v sfere korporativnogo kontrolya: grazhdansko-pravovye aspekty: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Volgograd, 2006. 200 s.
Lomakin D.V. Korporativnye pravootnosheniya: obshchaya teoriya i praktika ikh primeneniya v khozyaystvennykh obshchestvakh. M.: Statut, 2008. 511 s.
Makovskaya A.A. Vosstanovlenie korporativnogo kontrolya v sisteme sposobov zashchity korporativnykh prav // Vestnik VAS RF. 2009. № 1. S. 119-121.
Mikhal chuk YU. Vosstanovlenie prav na dolyu v OOO // EZH-YUrist. 2016. № 11. S. 12.
Mikhal chuk YU. Vosstanovlenie korporativnogo kontrolya pri utrate doli // EZH-YUrist. 2015. № 18-19. S. 12.
Mozolin V.P., YUdenkov A.P. Kommentariy k Federal nomu zakonu Ob aktsionernykh obshchestvakh . M.: Norma, 2003. 411 s.
Nazimov I.A. Vosstanovlenie korporativnogo kontrolya // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2014. № 2. S. 111-119.
Pisemskiy P. Aktsionernye kompanii s tochki zreniya grazhdanskogo prava. M.: Tip. Gracheva i Ko, 1876. 231 s.
Rusanova V.A. Korporativnye sposoby zashchity prav uchastnikov khozyaystvennykh obshchestv v svete izmeneniy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Korporativnoe pravo: aktual nye problemy / Pod red. D.V. Lomakina. M.: Infotropik Media, 2015. S. 189.
Sarbash S.V. Vosstanovlenie korporativnogo kontrolya // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 2008. № 4. S. 70-79.
Stepanov D.I. Fenomen korporativnogo kontrolya // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 2009. № 3. S. 142-206.
Sukhanov E.A. Kommentariy k st. 65.1-65.3 GK RF // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 2014. № 3. S. 107-130.
Sukhanov E.A. Sravnitel noe korporativnoe pravo. M.: Statut, 2015. 456 s.
Tal L.S. Priroda i vidy khozyayskoy vlasti // Tal L.S. Trudovoy dogovor: tsivilisticheskoe issledovanie. M.: Statut, 2006. S. 447-508.
Tal L.S. Problema vlasti nad chelovekom v grazhdanskom prave // YUridicheskiy vestnik. ZHurnal Moskovskogo yuridicheskogo obshchestva. Kn. 3. M., 1913. S. 103-140.
Tarasov I.T. Uchenie ob aktsionernykh kompaniyakh / Red kol.: V.S. Em, N.V. Kozlova, S.M. Korneev, E.V. Kulagina, D.V. Lomakin, P.A. Pankratov. M.: Statut, 2000. 666 s.
Ushnitskiy R.R. Al ternativnyy kommentariy k stat e 65.1 GK RF // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 2016. № 3. S. 107-119.
Ushnitskiy R.R. Stat ya 65.2 GK RF i priroda korporativnogo pravootnosheniya // ZHurnal predprinimatel skogo i korporativnogo prava. 2016. № 2. S. 57-60.
Ushnitskiy R.R. Teoriya korporativnogo prava i novella stat i 2 GK RF // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2015. № 12. S. 48-58.
Ushnitskiy R.R. O grazhdansko-pravovoy forme korporativnogo otnosheniya // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 2011. № 5. S. 64-91.
KHokhlov V.A. O vosstanovlenii korporativnogo kontrolya // ZHurnal predprinimatel skogo i korporativnogo prava. 2016. № 4. S. 9-14.
TSitovich P.P. Trudy po torgovomu i veksel nomu pravu: Uchebnik torgovogo prava. K voprosu o sliyanii torgovogo prava s grazhdanskim: V 2-kh t. / Nauch. red. V.S. Em. M.: Statut, 2005. T. 1. 460 s.
Adolf A. Berle Gardiner C. Means, the modern corporation and private property // Indiana Law Journal. 1933. Vol. 8. Issue 8.
Deborah A. DeMott. The Mechanism of Control, 13 Conn. J. Int l L. 233, 234 (1999); Bayne, supra note 3, at 447.
Leo E. Strine. Toward Common Sense and Common Ground Reflections on the Shared Interests of Managers and Labor in a More Rational System of Corporate Governance // Journal of Corporation Law. 2007. Vol. 33. Pp. 4-11.
Stephen M. Bainbridge. Director Primacy: The Means and Ends of Corporate Governance // UCLA, School of Law Research Paper. 2003. Isuue 02-06. 71 p.