Detection, recording and preservation of important forensic information when examining damaged documents
( Pp. 314-317)
More about authors
Mamontov Alexey Vladimirovich
Zamestitel zaveduyuschego laboratorii sudebno-tehnicheskoy ekspertizy dokumentov
FBU center of forensic expertise of the Ministry of justice
FBU center of forensic expertise of the Ministry of justice
Abstract:
The relevance of the topic of research of problems related to the quality of documents applying for an expert study. Expert practice clearly demonstrates that complex solutions to a number of problems are associated with the material state of the objects of research forensically. Information is lost already at the stage of their withdrawal, in the process of transportation or storage even before the start of the examination. It is also an important circumstance that in relation to one object, both a complex of various expert studies and research by experts in various organizations can be carried out. In this case, experts do not try to preserve the trace picture of the object in the future, making irreversible changes in the information field of the document. The article presents the tasks facing the expert, considers topical issues of the implementation of the storage mode for documents-material evidence. Some recommendations for working with such objects are given. The author proposes approaches to ensuring the conservation of research objects, is a methodological innovation in organizing the production of examinations.
How to Cite:
Mamontov A.V., (2020), DETECTION, RECORDING AND PRESERVATION OF IMPORTANT FORENSIC INFORMATION WHEN EXAMINING DAMAGED DOCUMENTS. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 5 => 314-317.
Reference list:
Treushnikov M.K. Sudebnye dokazatel stva. 4-e izd., pererab, i dop. - M.: OAO Izdatel skiy dom Gorodets , 2005. S. 200.
SHlyakhov A.R. Trudy po sudebnoy ekspertize / A.R. SHlyakhov. - M.: Nauka, 2006. - 567 s.
Berova D.M., Gauzhaeva V. A. Sposoby chastichnoy poddelki dokumentov i ikh vyyavlenie. // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - S. 264-266.
SHelupakhin V.S. Osobennosti kriminalisticheskogo issledovaniya istoricheskikh dokumentov. M.: 2008. S 24.
Perfil eva N.V., Vandanova D.D. Konservatsiya bibliotechnykh fondov: metod. posobie. Ulan-Ude, 2008. S.10.
Rossinskaya E.R. Sudebnaya ekspertiza v grazhdanskom, arbitrazhnom, administrativnom i ugolovnom protsesse. - M.: Norma, 2009. S. 71.
SHlyakhov A.R. Trudy po sudebnoy ekspertize / A.R. SHlyakhov. - M.: Nauka, 2006. - 567 s.
Berova D.M., Gauzhaeva V. A. Sposoby chastichnoy poddelki dokumentov i ikh vyyavlenie. // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - S. 264-266.
SHelupakhin V.S. Osobennosti kriminalisticheskogo issledovaniya istoricheskikh dokumentov. M.: 2008. S 24.
Perfil eva N.V., Vandanova D.D. Konservatsiya bibliotechnykh fondov: metod. posobie. Ulan-Ude, 2008. S.10.
Rossinskaya E.R. Sudebnaya ekspertiza v grazhdanskom, arbitrazhnom, administrativnom i ugolovnom protsesse. - M.: Norma, 2009. S. 71.
Keywords:
forensic examination, document, examination of documents, legal proceedings.
