On the possiblities of the prosecutors use of digital technologies in the consideration of the criminal case received whit the indictment
( Pp. 258-263)

The article considers the possibilities of optimizing the activities of the prosecutor in the examination of the criminal case received with in the indictment. It is stated that at this stage of pre-trial proceedings solves a double task. As a participant in criminal proceedings on the part of the prosecution, he is obliged to contribute to the task of identifying and exposing the perpetrator of the crimes for which the criminal proceedings against him have been initiated. It also oversees the procedural activities of investigative bodies. These activities are primarily aimed at ensuring the principle of the appointment of criminal proceedings. Under it, protection of the rights and legitimate interests of person and organizations, victim of crimes should be carried out only if the individual is protected from unlawful and unjustified accusation, conviction and maintenance of her rights and freedoms. A thorough examination by prosecutor of the criminal case brought with the indictment, the prevention of his submission to the court due to the poor quality of the investigation is one of the forms of implementation of this principle. The complexity and complexity of this work require rationalization, including through the development, testing and implementation of appropriate software tools. The article gives the views of prosecutors on the possibilities of their application in this activity. According to the author, such a programme may consist of relatively localized but internally unified and generally oriented sets of thought operations and proceedings of the prosecutors. Despite the fact that complete digitalization (robotics) of prosecutors supervision in pre-trial proceedings is almost impossible, the proposed option of optimizing the work of the prosecutor on the site under consideration is an undeniable means of ridding him of some routine operations, allowing him to focus on the most important issues to be solved at this stage.

Isaenko V.N., (2020), ON THE POSSIBLITIES OF THE PROSECUTORS USE OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE CONSIDERATION OF THE CRIMINAL CASE RECEIVED WHIT THE INDICTMENT. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 3 => 258-263.

Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12 dekabrya 1993 g.)//Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 04.08.2014, № 31, st. 43978.
Federal nyy zakon ot 17 yanvarya 1992 g. № 2202-1 O prokurature Rossiyskoy Federatsii//Vedomosti SND RF i VS RF, 20.08.1992, № 8, st. 366.
Strategiya razvitiya informatsionnogo obshchestva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii na 2017 - 2030 gody, utverzhdennaya Ukazom Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 09.05.2017 № 203// Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 15.05.2017, № 20, st. 2901.
Baev O.YA. Prokuror kak sub ekt ugolovnogo presledovaniya: nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. - M.: YUrlitinform, 2006. S. 60-75.
Belov S. TSifrovizatsiya nadzornoy deyatel nosti prokurora v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve//Zakonnost . 2019. № 4.
Isaenko V.N. Prokurorskiy nadzor za ispolneniem zakonov v operativno-rozysknoy deyatel nosti i v dosudebnom proizvodstve. - 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. - M.: YUrlitinform, 2018.
Nastol naya kniga prokurora. V 2 ch. CH. 2/ pod obshch.red. O.S. Kapinus i S.G. Kekhlerova. - 5-e izd., pererab. i dop. - M.: YUrayt, 2019.
SHCHerba S.P., Erezhepaliev D.I. Prokuror v dosudebnom proizvodstve po ugolovnym delam. - M.: YUrlitinform. 2015.
YUridicheskaya kontseptsiya robotizatsii: monografiya/otv.red. YU.A. Tikhomirov. - M.: Prospekt, 2019.

prosecutorial supervision, pre-trial, indictment, digital technology, computer program, optimization.