Some problems of criminal responsibility for theft (retrospective and modernity)
( Pp. 157-162)

Relevance, task. The level of relevance and scientific and practical significance of criminal-legal and criminological problems of countering property crimes in our country is conditioned by negative quantitative indicators. Criminological data show that property crime prevails in the overall structure of crime at the national level, of which theft swells a significant proportion. Internationally, our country occupies one of the highest places about the number of recorded thefts per 100,000 people. The composition of property crimes and criminal responsibility for the commission of attacks on other people's property, including theft, are provided in Chapter 21 «Crimes against property» of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation. The scientific article presents the results of a comparative legal analysis of the above-mentioned criminal law and the former Criminal code of the RSFR of 1960, the study of scientific literature, international legal documents, official documents of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, random expert surveys of scientific and educational workers from among criminal law specialists and law enforcement officers. This has revealed a number of criminal problems on liability for property crimes, which have led to the formulation of some theoretical conclusions and legislative proposals. Conclusions and suggestions. Taking into account the current and past legislative experience that took place in the Criminal code of the RSFSR of 1960, international legal acts, decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the study of the opinions of experts in the field of criminal law theory and the practice of its application in a scientific article, some conclusions are formulated. For example, the unreasonableness of legislative decisions to establish significant differences in the regulation of criminal responsibility for theft depending on the form of ownership of stolen property, the inadmissibility of repeating legislative errors when in accordance with art. 93.1 the Criminal code of the RSFSR 1960 for theft on a particularly large scale was provided for the penalty of capital punishment - the death penalty, the unreasonable recognition of property as the object of theft and other property crimes, because their property is not harmed, the victim does not lose ownership of stolen property. In addition to the article, the draft proposals for the legal nature of the law on the exclusion of the death penalty from the current criminal law, on amendments to the title of the chapter «Crime against property», setting it out in the next edition: «Property crimes».

Bazarov P.R., Pyankov M.N., (2020), SOME PROBLEMS OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEFT (RETROSPECTIVE AND MODERNITY). Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 1 => 157-162.

Artyemenko N. I. Kategoriya sobstvennost kak ob ekt ugolovno-pravovoy okhrany // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2011. № 9. S. 14-15.
Vseobshchaya deklaratsiya prav cheloveka: prinyata na tret ey sessii General noy Assamblei OON rezolyutsiey 217 A (III) ot 10 dekabrya 1948 g. // Bibliotechka Rossiyskoy gazety. 1999. Vyp. № 22-23.
Gabitov T. KH. Etika yurista: uchebnoe posobie. Almaty: YUridicheskaya literatura, 2008. 66 s.
Zakon RSFSR ot 25 iyulya 1962 g. O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks RSFSR // Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta RSFSR. 1962. № 29. St. 449.
Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993) (s uchyetom popravok, vnesyennykh Zakonami RF o popravkakh k Konstitutsii RF ot 30.12.2008 № 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 № 7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 № 2-FKZ, ot 21.07.2014 № 11-FKZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2014. № 31. St. 4398.
Kravtsov R. V., Kuznetsov V. I. K voprosu o priznakakh sostava krazhi chuzhogo imushchestva // Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. 2015. № 4 (71). S. 82-89.
Lopashenko N. A. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomiki: avtorskiy kommentariy k ugolovnomu zakonu (razd. VIII UK RF). M.: Volters Kluver, 2006. 673 s.
Mal ko A. V., Teryekhin V. A., Afanas ev S. F. Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. 2014. № 2. S. 79-89.
Malyshkina I. Vladimir Putin: posle Belgoroda ya zadumalsya o moratorii na smertnuyu kazn // Komsomol skaya pravda. 2013. 25 aprelya.
Mezhdunarodnyy pakt o grazhdanskikh i politicheskikh pravakh (N yu-York, 16 dekabrya 1966 g.): prinyat Rezolyutsiey 2200 (XXI) na 1496-om plenarnom zasedanii General noy Assamblei OON) // Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR. 1976. № 17. St. 291.
Nazarova F. Na puti k otmene smertnoy kazni - opyt SNG i Evropeyskogo Soyuza. Dushanbe, 2010. 166 s.
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 19 noyabrya 2009 g. № 1344-O-R O raz yasnenii punkta 5 rezolyutivnoy chasti Postanovleniya Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 2 fevralya 1999 goda № 3-P po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy stat i 41 i chasti tret ey stat i 42 Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa RSFSR, punktov 1 i 2 Postanovleniya Verkhovnogo Soveta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 16 iyulya 1993 goda O poryadke vvedeniya v deystvie Zakona Rossiyskoy Federatsii O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v Zakon RSFSR O sudoustroystve RSFSR , Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks RSFSR, Ugolovnyy kodeks RSFSR i Kodeks RSFSR ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2009. 27 noyabrya. № 226 (5050).
Postanovlenie VTSIK ot 1 iyunya 1922 g. O vvedenii v deystvie Ugolovnogo kodeksa RSFSR (vmeste s Ugolovnym kodeksom RSFSR) (utratil silu) // Elektronnyy resurs: Spravochno-pravovaya sistema Konsul tant Plyus .
Postanovlenie VTSIK ot 22 noyabrya 1926 g. O vvedenii v deystvie Ugolovnogo kodeksa RSFSR redaktsii 1926 goda (utratil silu) // Elektronnyy resurs: Spravochno-pravovaya sistema Konsul tant Plyus .
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 2 fevralya 1999 g. № 3-P Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy stat i 41 i chasti tret ey stat i 42 UPK RSFSR, punktov 1 i 2 postanovleniya Verkhovnogo Soveta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 16 iyulya 1993 goda O poryadke vvedeniya v deystvie Zakona Rossiyskoy Federatsii O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v Zakon RSFSR O sudoustroystve RSFSR , Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks RSFSR, Ugolovnyy kodeks RSFSR i Kodeks RSFSR ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v svyazi s zaprosom Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda i zhalobami ryada grazhdan // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1999. № 6. St. 867.
Protokol № 6 k Konventsii o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod otnositel no otmeny smertnoy kazni (Strasburg, 28 aprelya 1983 g.) // Elektronnyy resurs: Spravochno-pravovaya sistema Konsul tant Plyus .
Ugolovnyy kodeks RSFSR ot 27 oktyabrya 1960 g. (utratil silu) // Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta RSFSR. 1960. № 40. St. 591.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13 iyunya 1996 g. № 63-FZ (red. ot 27.12.2019) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1996. № 25. St. 2954.

criminal law, property crimes, theft, punishment, imprisonment, death penalty, international legal acts, Constitutional Court.