Features of the network model of innovation activity in the robotics cluster in the context of intellectual property protection
( Pp. 174-181)

This article is aimed at identifying and analyzing the features of the network model of innovation activity in the robotics cluster in the context of intellectual property protection on the example of a number of foreign countries and Russia. The starting point of the research is the currently observed creeping networking implicated as an introduction of non-market communication, which is beginning to replace purely exchange, monetary regulations in the economy, law and other spheres of society. The article analyzes approaches of foreign countries and Russia that create patterns of acceptability (acceptance, objective necessity) of the application of «open» innovations in the robotics cluster and some facets of the influence of this trend in the field of law based on analytical reflections on the information gathered from the sources and literature listed below. The relevance, theoretical and practical significance of such a research is due to the fact that both network «open» (innovative) and «closed» (traditional) methods of developing new scientific knowledge have their pros and cons, which can currently slow down or accelerate scientific progress and contribute to innovative growth. Experience of functioning of foreign institutes, research centers, etc. can be useful in finding answers to similar questions related to the development, justification and adoption of collaborations based on «open» innovations in our country. Such a research also serves to fill in the existing gap in the coverage of legal and other approaches of foreign countries in the field under study in the modern period. The author's results, among others, are presented in the idea that in a long- and even medium-term perspective there will be no need in patents both in the robotics cluster and other clusters (fields of activity, sub-sectors of the economy) due to a number of reasons that we have mentioned (the objective need for network collaborations, including «open» innovations, due to the inability to work and create alone, greater economic benefits that give collaborations and networks instead of other formats, etc.), which is indirectly confirmed today by the development of compatible blockchains.

Ksenia M.B., (2020), FEATURES OF THE NETWORK MODEL OF INNOVATION ACTIVITY IN THE ROBOTICS CLUSTER IN THE CONTEXT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 5 => 174-181.

Vektor i TSentr im. Gamalei rvut drug u druga sredstva na vaktsinu ot COVID Kak Rossiya delaet vaktsinu ot koronavirusa. 19.06.2020 URL: http://rucompromat.com/articles/vektor i tsentr im. gamalei vut drug u druga sredstva na vaktsinu ot covid (data obrashcheniya: 15.09.2020)
10 potryasayushchikh tekhnologiy v oblasti robototekhniki. URL: https://jborder.ru/roboty/10-potryasayushhix-texnologij-v-oblasti-robototexniki/ (data obrashcheniya: 13.09.2020);
10 samykh innovatsionnykh robototekhnicheskikh kompaniy mira. 25 fevralya 2014. URL: https://yandex.ru/turbo/hi-news.ru/s/robots/10-samyx-innovacionnyx-robototexnicheskix-kompanij-mira.html (data obrashcheniya: 13.09.2020)
Belikova K.M. Bioprinting i vyrashchivanie natural nykh tkaney i organov v stranakh BRIKS (na primere Brazilii, Indii, Kitaya i YUAR): podkhody zakonodatel stva ob intellektual noy sobstvennosti // Pravo i politika. - 2020. - № 5. - S. 35-57. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2020.5.32826 URL: https://nbpublish.com/library read article.php id 32826 (data obrashcheniya: 07.06.2020)
Belikova K.M. Intellektual nye prava, informatsiya i nauchnaya informatsiya v fokuse vnimaniya ekonomiki prava. // Intellektual naya sobstvennost . Promyshlennaya sobstvennost . - 2019. - № 4. - S. 31-43; № 5. - S. 23-31.
Belikova K.M. Osnova pravovogo regulirovaniya razvitiya i primeneniya iskusstvennogo intellekta v voennoy sfere Kitaya v kontekste gosudarstvennoy strategii i okhrany avtorskikh i patentnykh prav. // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2020. T. XIII. №5 (v pechati).
Belikova K.M. Pravovaya okhrana konkurentnoy sredy v stranakh BRIKS: nekotorye novelly zakonodatel stva Brazilii. // Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsiy: obrazovanie, nauka, novaya ekonomika. - 2012. - № 4. - S. 239-247.
Belikova K.M. Pravovaya okhrana konkurentnoy sredy v stranakh MERKOSUR. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk. - M., 2007. S. 30, 40 i dr.
Belikova K.M. Pravovaya reglamentatsiya otnosheniy po povodu nauchnoy informatsii v svete zakonodatel stva ob intellektual noy sobstvennosti stran BRIKS: monografiya / K. M. Belikova. - M.: RUDN, 2019. - S. 8-21, 43-121 (330 s.).
Vorzhevich A.S. Patentovanie farmatsevticheskikh razrabotok: problemnye aspekty. // Patenty i litsenzii. Intellektual nye prava. - 2020. - № 8. - S. 16-30.
Den gi na robototekhniku: varianty finansirovaniya i primery proektov. URL: https://robo-hunter.com/news/dengi-na-robototehniku-varianti-finansirovaniya-i-primeri-proektov8827 (data obrashcheniya: 13.09.2020)
Eremenko V.I. O sluzhebnom izobretatel stve v sootvetstvii s chast yu chetvertoy GK RF. // Advokat. - 2008. - № 7. - S. 33-39.
Efimov A., Petrova O. Kollaborativnaya robototekhnika Sberbanka: kakogo robota my mozhem sdelat vmeste s vami 20 iyunya 2018. URL: https://habr.com/ru/company/sberbank/blog/414589/ (data obrashcheniya: 13.09.2020)
Zachem Sberbanku roboty. 21 sen 2018. URL: https://vc.ru/sberbank/46022-zachem-sberbanku-roboty (data obrashcheniya: 13.09.2020)
L vov YU.A. Osnovy ekonomiki i organizatsii biznesa Tekst / YU.A. L vov. - SPb.: GMP FORMIKA , 1992. - S. 136 (383 s.).
Mayminas E. Informatsionnoe obshchestvo i paradigma ekonomicheskoy teorii. // Voprosy ekonomikiyu - 1997. - № 11. URL: http://sbiblio.com/biblio/archive/maiminas informobsch/ (data obrashcheniya: 13.09.2020)
Moskvin L.B. Setevizatsiya obshchestva: sotsial no-ekonomicheskiy i politicheskiy aspekty. // Sotsial no-gumanitarnye znaniya. - 2018. - № 3. - S. 47-59.
Raspredelennyy reestr v zakone o kriptovalyutakh: chto eto na samom dele. 13 June 2018. URL: https://zen.yandex.ru/media/crypto fox /raspredelennyi-reestr-v-zakone-o-kriptovaliutah-chto-eto-na-samom-dele-5b2127f58c8be31ae43dcd9e utm source serp (data obrashcheniya: 08.09.20)
Reaktsiya otrasli: novyy patent Sberbanka v oblasti tsifrovykh avatarov. 14 iyulya 2020. URL: https://ict.moscow/news/sberbank-patent/ (data obrashcheniya: 13.09.2020)
Titov L.YU. Setevaya model innovatsionnoy deyatel nosti i innovatsionnyy ekonomicheskiy rost. // Finansy i kredit. - 2009. - № 25 (361). - S. 54-6.
Uayatt Bart. Pochemu sovmestimost blokcheynov yavlyaetsya klyuchom k effektivnosti budushchikh innovatsiy 24 iyulya 2020. URL: https://coinspot.io/technology/pochemu-sovmestimost-blokchejnov-yavlyaetsya-klyuchom-k-effektivnosti-budushhih-innovacij/ (data obrashcheniya: 15.09.2020)
Arrow Kenneth J. The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing. // The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 29, No. 3 (Jun., 1962), pp. 155-173. URL: http://faculty.msmc.edu/hossain/grad bank and money policy/the 20economic 20implications 20of 20learning 20by 20doing arrow.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 06.01.2019) i dr. raboty etogo avtora
Belikova K.M. Information and scientific information in the orbit of the economy: technical and legal aspect. J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 2019, Vol. 16, No. 7. P. 2761-2766. doi:10.1166/jctn.2019.8125;
Belikova K.M. Intellectual Property in the Orbit of Economic Analysis: Some Aspects. J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 2019, Vol. 16, No. 7. P. 2767-2771. doi:10.1166/jctn.2019.8124
Belikova K.M. Intellectual Property in the Orbit of Economic Analysis: Some Aspects. J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 2019, Vol. 16, No. 7. P. 2767-2771. doi:10.1166/jctn.2019.8124
Jared Donovan. Open Innovation. July 20, 2020. URL: https://www.designrobotics.net/open-innovation/ : :text open 20innovation 20(oi) 20describes 20distributed,exchange 20of 20knowledge 20with 20others. text there 20are 20two 20important 20kinds, 2dbound 20and 20out 2dbound.(data obrashcheniya: 13.09.20)
Keisner A., Raffo J., Wunsch-Vincent S. (2016) Robotics: Breakthrough Technologies, Innovation, Intellectual Property. Foresight and STI Governance, vol. 10, no 2, pp. 7-27. DOI: 10.17323/1995-459X.2016.2.7.27

networking, network model of innovation-making, innovations, knowledge growth, robotics, robotics cluster, intellectual property protection, patents, collaborations, blockchain.