Extradition Today: Implementation Problems
( Pp. 150-154)

Purpose of the study. The purpose of the article is to consider the essence and some problems of the implementation of extradition, to identify possible directions for the development of this institution in the future. The analysis of the norms of national legislation demonstrates the insufficient development of legal technology in relation to the regulation of extradition issues. Moreover, a number of key issues of extradition have not found the necessary consolidation in the norms of domestic legislation, which naturally leads to legal gaps. A number of serious contradictions are also revealed in a comparative analysis of the norms of domestic and international legislation in relation to the contradictory regulation of extradition issues. The study analyzes the sources of international and Russian criminal law in the field of extradition. The article reveals the conflicts that exist between universal international treaties and national law, considers multiple examples of attempts to implement the provisions of bilateral extradition treaties. The institution of extradition is an important instrument of international cooperation in ensuring both national and international security. As a result, the authors come to the conclusion that modern extradition has a number of problems associated with the strengthening of its political significance. This fact testifies to the loss of the character of an instrument of legal assistance, carried out in a legal context.

Klemin A.V., Goncharova N.N., Denisovich V.V., (2022), EXTRADITION TODAY: IMPLEMENTATION PROBLEMS. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 6 => 150-154.

Alieva M.N., Temirsultanova N.T. Problems of the implementation of the institute of extradition in international and national law // Law and Law. 2019. No. 2. pp. 116-119.
Valeev R.M. Extradition of criminals in modern international law (Some issues of theory and practice). Kazan, 1976. -pp. 19-65.
Goncharova N.N. Problems of conducting criminal procedural actions with the participation of foreign citizens on the Russian territory, as well as in the buildings of embassies and consulates of Russia / N.N. Goncharova, E.Y. Latypova, N.A. Goncharov // Gaps in Russian legislation. 2021. Vol. 14. No. 4. pp. 366-372.
Goncharova N.N. Implementation of international norms and standards in the air legislation of Russia in the context of the ratio of international and Russian law / N.N. Goncharova // International public and private law. 2018. No. 6. pp. 26-29.
Kayumova A.R. Criminal jurisdiction in international law: issues of theory and practice: dissertation... Doctor of Law: 12.00.10 / Kayumova A.R. Kazan, 2016. -448 p.
Koshkina D.A. Modern trends in the development and improvement of the judicial procedure for the extradition of persons who have committed crimes of a terrorist nature through its unification // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Jurisprudence. 2017. No. 2. p. 2.
Latypova E.Y. The principle of equality and the principle of humanism and their features in criminal law // In the collection: The Constitution of the Russian Federation and the development of the legal system of the state: general theoretical and sectoral aspects. Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (Kazan, 30.10.2018). -Kazan: Publishing House «Fatherland», 2019. -pp. 341-346.
Latypova E.Yu., Nechaeva E.V. Controversial issues of the content of the principle of humanism in criminal law // Bulletin of the Kazan Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2019. No. 3 (37). pp. 355-360.
Purgina O.V. Extradition-grounds and procedure for its implementation // Migration law. 2009. No. 4. pp. 5-7.
Reshetneva T.V. Extradition of persons for criminal prosecution in the context of the humanistic foundations of criminal procedure and international legal regulation // Bulletin of the Udmurt University. 2018. No. 4. p. 26.

extradition, international law, criminal law, extradition of criminals, cooperation between states, the fight against crime, the implementation of the rule of law.