TOWARDS THE QUESTION OF FRAUDSTER IN THE LOAN FIELD
( Pp. 273-276)

The issues of tagging of the special fraudster in the loan field are relevant for the theory and practice of criminal law. This reason is conditioned by the need of their in-depth study to ensure the uniformity in legal precedents of the criminal statute established under Article 159.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and its preventive opportunity’s implementation. Research methodology: The main categories and concepts analysis intended for the rightful identification of the fraudster acting which take place in financial and credit fields is done by dialectical, comparative, technical and logical methods. Summary: The article reveals the particularities of the design features identification of special fraudster established under Article 159.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Legal scholars and positive and criminal law provisions analysis have allowed to establish the key problems arisen out of the identification of special fraudster in the loan field. Within the framework of this article, a change of the norm wording of Article 159.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation would be justified by the need to concretize in details the scents of fraudster. The challenge study and the consideration of the provision evidenced in the criminal doctrine and in the case-law of courts made it possible to engineer a change proposal aimed to upgrading of the criminal norm which is responsible for the fraud in the loan field. Significance: The research provisions can be used for teaching of criminal law courses and for practical implementation of criminal nature of the offense.

Pomnina S.N., (2019), TOWARDS THE QUESTION OF FRAUDSTER IN THE LOAN FIELD. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 5 => 273-276.

Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. CHast 2. Prinyat 26 yanvarya 1996 goda № 14-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1996. № 5. St.410.
O potrebitel skom kredite (zayme): Federal nyy zakon ot 21 dekabrya 2013 goda № 353-FZ (v red. ot 01.05.2019 goda) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2013. № 51. St. 6673.
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o moshennichestve, prisvoenii i rastrate: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 30 noyabrya 2017 goda №48 // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2017. 11 dekabrya.
Dorozhkin S. S. Sub ektivnye priznaki moshennichestva v sfere kreditovaniya elektronnyy resurs // Rezhim dostupa: URL:htpp//www. legalscience.ru/images/PDF/2016/7/sub-ektivnye-priznaki-moshennichestva.pdf.
Ermakova O. V. Problemy kvalifikatsii moshennichestva v sfere kreditovaniya // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2016. №406. S. 197-201.
Semenchuk V. V., SHvets A. V. Problemy kvalifikatsii moshennichestva v kreditnoy sfere v svete poslednikh izmeneniy v ugolovnom zakonodatel stve // YUridicheskiy mir. 2013. № 6. (198). S. 17-20.
Urda M., SHeveleva S. Problemy primeneniya st. 159.1 UK RF // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. №6. S. 70-73.
Postanovlenie Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 31 marta 2014 g. № 4u/1-1590/2014 elektronnyy resurs // Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Prigovor Leninskogo rayonnogo suda g. Rostova-na-Donu ot 16 avgusta 2017 g. po ugolovnomu delu № 1-268/2017 elektronnyy resurs . - Rezhim dostupa: URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/pMMvR8AeaDdg/. - Zagl. s ekrana.
Prigovor Moskovskogo rayonnogo suda g. Kazani Respubliki Tatarstan ot 13 noyabrya 2017 g. po ugolovnomu delu № 1-446/2017. elektronnyy resurs . - Rezhim dostupa: URL:https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/QKUHNug9tjxy/. - Zagl. s ekrana.

crime, fraud, credit financing, borrower, creditor, bank, false information.