GOOD FAITH CONDUCT OF THE DEBTOR AS THE BASIS FOR BENEFITS IN ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS
( Pp. 212-215)

More about authors
Novikov Ivan A. post-graduate student
Kazan Federal University
For read the full article, please, register or log in
Abstract:
Task. The relevance of the topic of integrity of participants in enforcement proceedings is due to the need to improve the efficiency of this type of law enforcement. Most research in this area is devoted to the problems of enforcement, while the issues of incentives for voluntary execution at the monographic level, in the scientific domestic and foreign literature, practically not considered. The author turned to this topic in order to analyze the possibility of the principle of good faith applied in civil law to relations in enforcement proceedings, which will allow to apply more widely the method of stimulation to the execution of court decisions without the use of coercive measures. Model. The author used the methods of system and complex analysis of the legal norms regulating the possibility of application of privileges in enforcement proceedings under the condition of conscientious behavior of the parties. Summary. The author comes to the conclusion that the only norm establishing privileges for conscientious behavior is article 112 Of the law on enforcement proceedings, which exempts the debtor from paying the enforcement fee in the case of voluntary performance within the prescribed period. The author proposes to consolidate the principle of good faith of the parties of enforcement proceedings as one of the basic principles and to specify it in the legislation on enforcement proceedings. The scope of the study. Subsequent use of the results of scientific work is possible in a deeper scientific study of the problems of stimulation in enforcement proceedings. Practical importance. The practical significance of the work lies in the proposed by the author improvement of the legislation and their application in law enforcement practice. Originality / value. This work is intended for teachers and students of higher education institutions in the field of «jurisprudence» as well as for practicing lawyers involved in the field of enforcement proceedings
How to Cite:
Novikov I.A., (2018), GOOD FAITH CONDUCT OF THE DEBTOR AS THE BASIS FOR BENEFITS IN ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 4: 212-215.
Reference list:
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 № 51-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF.1994. № 32. St. 3301.
Federal nyy zakon ot 26.10.2002 № 127-FZ (red. ot 29.12.2017) O nesostoyatel nosti (bankrotstve) // Dostup iz SPS Konsul tantPlyus.
Federal nyy zakon ot 02.10.2007 № 229-FZ (red. ot 31.12.2017) Ob ispolnitel nom proizvodstve // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF.2007. № 41. St. 4849.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 23.06.2015 № 25 O primenenii sudami nekotorykh polozheniy razdela I chasti pervoy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Rossiyskaya gazeta. - 30.06.2015. - №140.
Barsukova V.N. Ogranicheniya prav dolzhnika v ispolnitel nom proizvodstve: pravovoe i nravstvennoe izmerenie. / Ogranichenie prav dolzhnika: novelly zakonodatel stva i praktika primeneniya: sbornik materialov 6-y Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, 8 - 10 sentyabrya 2015 g., g. Ulan-Ude, Respublika Buryatiya / D.B. Abushenko, A.D. Avdeev, A. Arutyunyan i dr.; otv. red. A.O. Parfenchikov, V.A. Gureev. - M.: Statut, 2016. - 368 s.
Bakhrakh D.N. Pravovye l goty // Spravedlivost i pravo. Sverdlovsk: SYUI, 1989. S. 77.
Beloborodov M.V. Problemnye voprosy ispolneniya trebovaniy neimushchestvennogo kharaktera v otnoshenii nedvizhimogo imushchestva dolzhnika / Poryadok ispolneniya trebovaniy neimushchestvennogo kharaktera, soderzhashchikhsya v ispolnitel nykh dokumentakh: problemnye voprosy i puti ikh resheniya: sbornik materialov 7-y Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, 9-11 iyunya 2016, Ufa, Resp. Bashkortostan / D.B. Abushenko, A.D. Avdeev, Z.M. ogly Alizade i dr.; otv.red. D.V. Aristov, V.A. Gureev. -M.: Statut, 2017. -560 s.
Bychkov A. Ispolnitel skiy sbor: pravovye aspekty vzyskaniya // Novaya bukhgalteriya. 2016. № 1. S. 134-143.
Valeev D.KH. Vidy protsessual nykh garantiy v ispolnitel nom proizvodstve // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. 2009. № 5.
Valeev D.KH. Sistema printsipov v ispolnitel nom proizvodstve // Ispolnitel noe pravo. 2006. № 1.
Isaenkov A.A. Immunitety v ispolnitel nom proizvodstve // Praktika ispolnitel nogo proizvodstva. 2014. № 1-2. S. 58-63.
Mal ko A.V. L gotnaya i pooshchritel naya pravovaya politika. SPb.: YUridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2004. S. 63.
Ozhegov S.I. Slovar russkogo yazyka. 9-e izd., ispr. i dop. / Pod red. N.YU. SHvedovoy. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1972. S. 305.
Solov eva T.V. Printsipy ispolnitel nogo proizvodstva kak garantiya realizatsii prav vzyskatelya i dolzhnika / Ogranichenie prav dolzhnika: novelly zakonodatel stva i praktika primeneniya: sbornik materialov 6-y Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, 8 - 10 sentyabrya 2015 g., g. Ulan-Ude, Respublika Buryatiya / D.B. Abushenko, A.D. Avdeev, A. Arutyunyan i dr.; otv. red. A.O. Parfenchikov, V.A. Gureev. - M.: Statut, 2016. - 368 s.