TO THE QUESTION OF THE NORMATIVISM RENOVATION IN THE MECHANISM OF LEGAL REGULATION (THE CIVIL LAW ASPECT)
( Pp. 145-148)

The article is dedicated to the renovation (reconstruction, restoration) of Normativism based on the realities of the modern world and the need for preparation of transfer to a «virtual» environment. The article attempts to base the renovation of the Normativism, as it is possible without integrity destruction of its design in general. Legal regulation mechanism is chosen by authors for the study of Normativism due to the traditions of Russian legal science and General arguable promises concerning LRM unity and announcement of all elements of LRM structure as legal means. In the aspect of integrative legal consciousness doctrine development three kinds of Normativism are highlighted in the present article: absolute; conditional; abstract. Various quality-substantial proportions of state and law are in the basis of this Normativism differentiation and thus are their functions. The civil law aspect of Normativism and its renovation research is due to scientific and practical preferences of the authors, the methodological conviction of deduction priority over induction, as well as a large amount of required empirical material and the possibility of objective illustration advanced theoretical theses. The following conclusions are made: first, approaches to the Normativism must be differentiated on the basis of a specific historical period; second, the qualitative diversity of Normativism happens due to the varying ratio of state and legal functions in different historical periods; third, informative quality of Normativism also depends on the real balance of economy-politics-law and their hierarchy in different historical periods.

Malysheva E.Y., Stepanova V.E., (2019), TO THE QUESTION OF THE NORMATIVISM RENOVATION IN THE MECHANISM OF LEGAL REGULATION (THE CIVIL LAW ASPECT). Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 2 => 145-148.

Alekseeva T.A. Sovremennye politicheskie teorii. - M., 2000. S. 342.
Eliseev A.P., Mukhortov A.A. Nekotorye aspekty pravoprimenitel noy deyatel nosti kak osoboy formy realizatsii prava// Probely v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2014. № 6. S. 225-229.
Novgorodtsev P.I. Vvedenie v filosofiyu prava. - SPb.: Lan , 2000. S. 352.
Sadokhina N.E. Resheniya Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF v sisteme istochnikov rossiyskogo prava// Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2018. №4. S. 37-40.
Tikhomirova L.V., Tikhomirov M.YU. YUridicheskaya entsiklopediya. Izdanie 5-e, dop., i pererab. / Pod red. M.YU. Tikhomirova. - M., 2001. S. 375.
Tikhonov M.S. Ekonomicheskie osnovy amerikanskogo federalizma. (Konstitutsionno-pravovye aspekty): Dis. kand. yurid. nauk. - M., 2002. S. 184.
Ulen Tomas S. Teoriya ratsional nogo vybora v ekonomicheskom analize prava // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 2011. №3.
KHandshu E. Zakonodatel stvo. Programma i protsedura. / - Gaydel berg: Deyker Myuller, 1991. S. 235.
KHmelevskaya S.A. Normativizm v teorii prava: mnogoobrazie aspektov// Probely v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2015. № 1. S. 45-49.
Engel s F. Lyudvig Feyerbakh i konets klassicheskoy nemetskoy filosofii. Marks K., Engel s F. PSS. 2-e izd. V 50 t. T. 21. S. 312.