Purposes of advocate's investigation in the russian criminal process
( Pp. 294-297)
More about authors
Salakko Alexander Sergeyevich
aspirant. Mesto ucheby: Sibirskiy Federalnyy Universitet. Podrazdelenie: kafedra ugolovnogo processa i kriminalistiki. Dolzhnost: advokat. Mesto raboty: «Pervaya Krasnoyarskaya kraevaya kollegiya advokatov».
Siberian Federal University; “First Krasnoyarsk Territory Lawyers’ Bar Association”
Siberian Federal University; “First Krasnoyarsk Territory Lawyers’ Bar Association”
Abstract:
The article analyzes with the issues as a structural element of advocate's investigation. The author substantiates the thesis that the activities of advocate for the collection of evidentiary information is the multi-purpose nature, provides a critical analysis of different types of purposes, discusses specifying practical examples, when advocates on proper objective setting can make significant progress in protection of rights, freedoms and client's legitimate interests. For a more systematic understanding of purposes of advocate's investigation, author refers to such concepts as investigative and judicial errors. The article justified that the defender, when planning work, should consider not only the array of evidence collected by the prosecution, but also errors and contradictions made by investigators and judges. The author analyzes the relationship of purposes of advocate's investigation with investigative and judicial errors. With the aim of objectification of the results of the study, the article presents the survey of 50 practicing advocates of the Bar chamber of Krasnoyarsk Krai. The results of scientific work can be used for further theoretical developments of institute of advocate's investigation, and to improve practical aspects of the activities of advocates for criminal cases.
How to Cite:
Salakko A.S., (2016), PURPOSES OF ADVOCATE'S INVESTIGATION IN THE RUSSIAN CRIMINAL PROCESS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 8 => 294-297.
Reference list:
Brester A.A., Panchenko V.YU. Nesovpadenie pozitsiy obvinyaemogo i zashchitnika pri otritsanii viny v protsesse ugolovnoy zashchity // Advokatskaya praktika. 2012. N 6. S. 10 - 12.
Grinenko A.V. Poiskovaya deyatel nost zashchitnika // Advokatskaya praktika. 2002. №5. S. 32.
Martynchik E.G. Advokatskoe rassledovanie v ugolovnom protsesse. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie osnovy doktriny advokatskogo rassledovaniya. M. YUrist. 2009. S. 133.
Mel nikov V.YU. Neobkhodimo li vozvrashchat sya k voprosu advokatskogo rassledovaniya // Advokatskaya praktika. 2015. N 4. S. 8.
Nazarov A.D. Vliyanie sledstvennykh oshibok na oshibki suda. M. SPb.: YUridicheskiy tsentr Press. 2003.
Nazarov A.D. Obvinitel nyy uklon v deyatel nosti sub ektov, vedushchikh ugolovnyy protsess, kak faktor, sposobstvuyushchiy poyavleniyu oshibok v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2015. N 9. S. 149.
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 30.11.2006 N 20-O06-47SP.
Grinenko A.V. Poiskovaya deyatel nost zashchitnika // Advokatskaya praktika. 2002. №5. S. 32.
Martynchik E.G. Advokatskoe rassledovanie v ugolovnom protsesse. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie osnovy doktriny advokatskogo rassledovaniya. M. YUrist. 2009. S. 133.
Mel nikov V.YU. Neobkhodimo li vozvrashchat sya k voprosu advokatskogo rassledovaniya // Advokatskaya praktika. 2015. N 4. S. 8.
Nazarov A.D. Vliyanie sledstvennykh oshibok na oshibki suda. M. SPb.: YUridicheskiy tsentr Press. 2003.
Nazarov A.D. Obvinitel nyy uklon v deyatel nosti sub ektov, vedushchikh ugolovnyy protsess, kak faktor, sposobstvuyushchiy poyavleniyu oshibok v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2015. N 9. S. 149.
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 30.11.2006 N 20-O06-47SP.
Keywords:
lawyer, advocacy, purpose attorney's investigation, criminal procedure law.
