PREREQUISITES OF APPLICATION OF MEASURES OF THE STATE PROTECTION OF THE PARTICIPANTS OF THE RUSSIAN CRIMINAL TRIAL PROMOTING JUSTICE
( Pp. 278-282)
More about authors
Dmitriyeva Anna Aleksandrovna
kand. yurid. nauk, docent. Dolzhnost: docent. Mesto raboty: Nacionalnyy issledovatelskiy universitet «Yuzhno-Uralskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet». Podrazdelenie: kafedra ugolovnogo processa i kriminalistiki.
National research university “Southern Ural state university”
National research university “Southern Ural state university”
Abstract:
Occasions and the basis as obligatory prerequisites, applications of security measures and measures of social support in the relation of the persons rendering assistance to criminal justice are considered. It is brought the critic of the available list of ways of threat to the protected face in whom only concrete structures of crimes are specified. The general formulation of reality of threat of the person rendering assistance to criminal justice which shouldn't be limited is necessary. The task - to Determine basic reasons of insignificant application of measures of the state protection of the participants of criminal procedure promoting the Russian criminal trial. One of such reasons, uncertainty of prerequisites of decision making about application of measures of protection Model - as a methodological basis research of problems of legislative and law-enforcement activity in the course of application of measures of the state protection is determined. Conclusions - Are offered the main directions of change of the regulatory base and increase of efficiency of application of measures of the state protection of the persons promoting criminal proceeding. A framework a research/a possibility of subsequent use of results of scientific work - the offer can be used by further comparison of occasions and the bases of application of measures of the state protection with other prerequisites of application of other security measures of participants of criminal procedure. Practical value - offers of enhancement of the existing Russian legislation on safety of participants of criminal procedure can draw attention of law enforcement officials (investigators, investigating officers, prosecutors and vessels) Social consequences - increase of efficiency of ensuring the state protection of participants of criminal trial who help criminal justice the authority of law-enforcement system will allow to raise [NEW] and will provide keen interest in assistance in fight against crime from citizens as potential participants of criminal procedure. Originality/value - the offered directions of increase of efficiency of the right regulation of prerequisites of application of measures of the state protection can be used for future enhancement of the Russian legislation including areas of criminal trial regarding elimination of contradictions of the separate precepts of law regulating general legal institutions.
How to Cite:
Dmitriyeva A.A., (2016), PREREQUISITES OF APPLICATION OF MEASURES OF THE STATE PROTECTION OF THE PARTICIPANTS OF THE RUSSIAN CRIMINAL TRIAL PROMOTING JUSTICE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 8 => 278-282.
Reference list:
Brusnitsyn L.V. Teoretiko-pravovye osnovy i mirovoy opyt obespecheniya bezopasnosti lits. sodeystvuyushchikh ugolovnomu pravosudiyu: diss. dokt. yurid. nauk. M. 2002.
Dmitrieva A.A. Problemy povysheniya effektivnosti obespecheniya bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa v stadii predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2015. № 3. S. 140-143.
Epikhin A.YU. Kontseptsiya bezopasnosti lichnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. - Syktyvkar: Syktyvkarskiy un-t, 2000.
Epikhin A.YU. Obshchie usloviya primeneniya mer bezopasnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Politicheskie, ekonomicheskie i sotsiokul turnye aspekty regional nogo upravleniya na Evropeyskom Severe: Sbornik materialov II nauchno-teoreticheskoy konferentsii 24 aprelya 2003 goda. Syktyvkar: Syktyvkarskiy un-t, 2003. S. 64-69.
Epikhin A.YU. Obshchie usloviya effektivnosti funktsionirovaniya bezopasnosti lichnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2003. № 4. S. 69-70.
Epikhin A.YU. Predposylki primeneniya mer bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa // Tatishchevskie chteniya: aktual nye problemy nauki i praktiki: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. - Seriya: Pravootnosheniya i yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost : V 2 ch. - Tol yatti: Volzhskiy universitet im. V.N. Tatishcheva, 2004. - CH. 1. -S. 180-183.
Epikhin A.YU. Pravovye osnovy bezopasnosti lichnosti i ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v otdel nykh mezhdunarodnykh dokumentakh // Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya. 2012. № 2. S. 12-14.
Zaytsev O.A. Teoreticheskie i pravovye osnovy gosudarstvennoy zashchity uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: diss. dokt.yurid.nauk. M., 1999.
Zaytsev E.O. Rasshirenie osnovaniy oglasheniya pokazaniy svidetelya i inye sredstva obespecheniya bezopasnosti v sudebnom zasedanii // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2016. № 2. S. 134-137.
Ibragimov I.M. Pravomernye vozmozhnosti zashchity prav poterpevshego v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse. M.: YUrisprudentsiya, 2008. S. 165.
Makarova O.V. Obespechenie bezopasnosti lits, sposobstvuyushchikh preduprezhdeniyu i raskrytiyu korruptsionnykh prestupleniy // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2015. № 7. S. 97 - 105.
Postanovlenie Pravitel stva RF ot 11.11.2006 № 664 (red. ot 14.07.2015) Ob utverzhdenii Pravil vyplaty edinovremennykh posobiy poterpevshim, svidetelyam i inym uchastnikam ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva, v otnoshenii kotorykh v ustanovlennom poryadke prinyato reshenie ob osushchestvlenii gosudarstvennoy zashchity // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 20.11.2006. № 47. St. 4895.
Postanovlenie Pravitel stva RF ot 13.07.2013 № 586 (red. ot 13.08.2015) Ob utverzhdenii Gosudarstvennoy programmy Obespechenie bezopasnosti poterpevshikh, svideteley i inykh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva na 2014 - 2018 gody // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 22.07.2013. № 29. St. 3965.
Revina I.V. Bezopasnost lits, sodeystvuyushchikh pravosudiyu: problemy obespecheniya // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2013. № 10. S. 51 - 53.
Ryabov S.A. Obespechenie bezopasnosti zashchishchaemykh lits v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: analiz rossiyskogo zakonodatel stva // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2015. № 5. S. 161-164.
Samoroka V., Beketov M. Prinyatie sledovatelem resheniya o primenenii mer bezopasnosti v otnoshenii uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2011. № 1. S. 72 - 77.
Skripilev G.A. Predposylki primeneniya mer bezopasnosti lichnosti v ugolovnom protsesse // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2012. № 18. S. 21 - 24.
Federal nyy zakon ot 20.08.2004 № 119-FZ (red. ot 08.03.2015) O gosudarstvennoy zashchite poterpevshikh, svideteley i inykh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 23.08.2004. № 34. St. 3534.
SHnitenkov A.V., Velikiy D.P. Kommentariy k Federal nomu zakonu O gosudarstvennoy zashchite poterpevshikh, svideteley i inykh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva (postateynyy). M.: YUstitsinform, 2007. S. 79.
Dmitrieva A.A. Problemy povysheniya effektivnosti obespecheniya bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa v stadii predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2015. № 3. S. 140-143.
Epikhin A.YU. Kontseptsiya bezopasnosti lichnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. - Syktyvkar: Syktyvkarskiy un-t, 2000.
Epikhin A.YU. Obshchie usloviya primeneniya mer bezopasnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Politicheskie, ekonomicheskie i sotsiokul turnye aspekty regional nogo upravleniya na Evropeyskom Severe: Sbornik materialov II nauchno-teoreticheskoy konferentsii 24 aprelya 2003 goda. Syktyvkar: Syktyvkarskiy un-t, 2003. S. 64-69.
Epikhin A.YU. Obshchie usloviya effektivnosti funktsionirovaniya bezopasnosti lichnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2003. № 4. S. 69-70.
Epikhin A.YU. Predposylki primeneniya mer bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa // Tatishchevskie chteniya: aktual nye problemy nauki i praktiki: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. - Seriya: Pravootnosheniya i yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost : V 2 ch. - Tol yatti: Volzhskiy universitet im. V.N. Tatishcheva, 2004. - CH. 1. -S. 180-183.
Epikhin A.YU. Pravovye osnovy bezopasnosti lichnosti i ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v otdel nykh mezhdunarodnykh dokumentakh // Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya. 2012. № 2. S. 12-14.
Zaytsev O.A. Teoreticheskie i pravovye osnovy gosudarstvennoy zashchity uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: diss. dokt.yurid.nauk. M., 1999.
Zaytsev E.O. Rasshirenie osnovaniy oglasheniya pokazaniy svidetelya i inye sredstva obespecheniya bezopasnosti v sudebnom zasedanii // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2016. № 2. S. 134-137.
Ibragimov I.M. Pravomernye vozmozhnosti zashchity prav poterpevshego v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse. M.: YUrisprudentsiya, 2008. S. 165.
Makarova O.V. Obespechenie bezopasnosti lits, sposobstvuyushchikh preduprezhdeniyu i raskrytiyu korruptsionnykh prestupleniy // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2015. № 7. S. 97 - 105.
Postanovlenie Pravitel stva RF ot 11.11.2006 № 664 (red. ot 14.07.2015) Ob utverzhdenii Pravil vyplaty edinovremennykh posobiy poterpevshim, svidetelyam i inym uchastnikam ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva, v otnoshenii kotorykh v ustanovlennom poryadke prinyato reshenie ob osushchestvlenii gosudarstvennoy zashchity // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 20.11.2006. № 47. St. 4895.
Postanovlenie Pravitel stva RF ot 13.07.2013 № 586 (red. ot 13.08.2015) Ob utverzhdenii Gosudarstvennoy programmy Obespechenie bezopasnosti poterpevshikh, svideteley i inykh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva na 2014 - 2018 gody // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 22.07.2013. № 29. St. 3965.
Revina I.V. Bezopasnost lits, sodeystvuyushchikh pravosudiyu: problemy obespecheniya // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2013. № 10. S. 51 - 53.
Ryabov S.A. Obespechenie bezopasnosti zashchishchaemykh lits v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: analiz rossiyskogo zakonodatel stva // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2015. № 5. S. 161-164.
Samoroka V., Beketov M. Prinyatie sledovatelem resheniya o primenenii mer bezopasnosti v otnoshenii uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2011. № 1. S. 72 - 77.
Skripilev G.A. Predposylki primeneniya mer bezopasnosti lichnosti v ugolovnom protsesse // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2012. № 18. S. 21 - 24.
Federal nyy zakon ot 20.08.2004 № 119-FZ (red. ot 08.03.2015) O gosudarstvennoy zashchite poterpevshikh, svideteley i inykh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 23.08.2004. № 34. St. 3534.
SHnitenkov A.V., Velikiy D.P. Kommentariy k Federal nomu zakonu O gosudarstvennoy zashchite poterpevshikh, svideteley i inykh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva (postateynyy). M.: YUstitsinform, 2007. S. 79.
Keywords:
criminal case, the criminal process, the protected person, witness, witness, protection of witnesses, protection of victims, state protection, social support, the victim, the victim of a crime.
