CRIMINAL POLICY AND ITS ROLE IN CREATION OF SANCTIONS OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF ROSSYSKY FEDERATION
( Pp. 33-36)

Background: in article the criminal policy generating correction of criminal precepts of law in connection with the numerous changes and additions made to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is analyzed. It is noted that one of tasks of criminal policy shall become development of such regulations which would be the stablest and didn't require frequent changes that will promote increase in efficiency of all-preventive function of the penal statute. Contents of criminal legal sanctions are reflection of the operating criminal policy and the legislator in case of their designing shall reckon with economic, political, social, spiritual realities. Methodology: when writing a research special methods were used: statistical - when studying quantity and quality characteristics of criminal legal sanctions; method of expert evaluations - when forecasting development of a criminological situation in case of acceptance of the offered changes in the legislation. By means of questioning the opinion of the practicing employees concerning shortcomings of creation of sanctions of criminal precepts of law was studied. Conclusions: on the basis of the analysis of the current legislation and empirical data the author draws a conclusion about imperfection and groundlessness of a legislative design of sanctions and makes offers on their model enhancement in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Within this work influence of criminal policy on the creation of sanctions implying their social conditionality and justification is researched. Changes and additions of the penal legislation should be developed in indissoluble unity with the fundamental ideas of general criminal policy of our country. Originality: the importance of results of work consists in improvement of the existing criminal legislation, and also in giving to lawmaking on creation of sanctions of a scientific basis. Streamlining of legislative activity will lead to more reasonable and fair law enforcement.

Gustova E.V., (2016), CRIMINAL POLICY AND ITS ROLE IN CREATION OF SANCTIONS OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF ROSSYSKY FEDERATION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 33-36.

Gal perin I.M. Nakazanie: sotsial nye funktsii, praktika primeneniya. M., 1983. 208 s.
Ivanchenko E.A. Konstruirovanie ugolovno-pravovykh sanktsiy s uchetom noveyshey ugolovnoy politiki gosudarstva Elektronnyy resurs . - Rezhim dostupa: http://www.sartraccc.ru/i.php oper read file filename Pub/ivanchenko 286-08-08 2 .htm (data obrashcheniya: 15.09.2016).
Zvecharovskiy I.E. Sovremennoe ugolovnoe pravo Rossii: ponyatie, printsipy, politika. SPb.: YUridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2001. 100 s.
Kriger G.A., Kriger G.L. O dopolnitel nykh merakh nakazaniya // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1972. № 1. S. 13-15.
Kriger G.A. Nakazanie i ego primenenie. M.: YUrid. lit., 1962. 70 c.
Kriminologiya: uchebnik / pod obshch. red. A.I. Dolgovoy. 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Norma: Infra-M. 2010. 1008 s.
Kuznetsov A.P. Sistema ugolovnogo zakonodatel stva: metodologiya i teoriya // Ugolovnoe pravo: strategii razvitiya v XXI veke: sbornik materialov Tret ey mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. M., 2006. S. 20-29.
Lopashenko N.A. Ugolovnaya politika. M.: Volters Kluver, 2009. 608 s.
Orlovskaya N.A. Osnovaniya i printsipy postroeniya ugolovno-pravovykh sanktsiy: monografiya. Odessa: YUridicheskaya literatura. 2011. 622 s.
Utkin V.A. Reforma sistemy ugolovnykh nakazaniy kak uslovie effektivnosti al ternativnykh sanktsiy // Rossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy vzglyad. 2011. № 2. S. 252-254.
Filimonov V.D. Norma ugolovnogo prava. SPb.: YUridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2004. 505 s.

criminal policy, criminal penalties, conditionality, consistency, consistency.