Regulation of responsibility for complicity in a crime in the form of mediation in bribery
( Pp. 155-158)
More about authors
Subachev Aleksey K.
aspirant
Far Eastern Federal University, Law School
Far Eastern Federal University, Law School
Abstract:
This article is dedicated to the criminal analysis of the crime stipulated the article 2911 of the Criminal Code of Russian Federation, identifying its similarity with single criminal law rules of institute of complicity in crime with the view to determination presence or absence causes for criminalization of mediation in bribery as separate corpus delicti. The methodology of research is analogy of analyzing criminal law rules. The article was written with applying of system-structural method and different forms of interpretation of criminal law rules. Furthermore, in the article was applied comparative historical method. The normative basis of the research consists of criminal law rules of institute of complicity in crime and rules that establish responsibility for mediation in bribery. The empirical base of the research includes the decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Russian Federation. The theoretical base of the research consists of doctrinal development of the institute of complicity in crime and mediation in bribery. The results of the study made it possible to conclude that the criminalization of mediation in bribery in the criminal law of Russia is not grounded. The practical significance of the study is the possibility of using the results of the research while improving the criminal law provisions provided for in parts 1-4 of article 2911 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
How to Cite:
Subachev A.K., (2017), REGULATION OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR COMPLICITY IN A CRIME IN THE FORM OF MEDIATION IN BRIBERY. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 155-158.
Reference list:
O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v svyazi s sovershenstvovaniem gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v oblasti protivodeystviya korruptsii. Federal nyy zakon ot 04.05.2011 № 97-FZ // Rossiyskaya gazeta. № 97. 06.05.2011.
Ugolovnyy kodeks RSFSR Elektronnyy resurs : utverzhden Verkhovnym Sovetom RSFSR 27.10.1960. Dokument utratil silu. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o vzyatochnichestve i kommercheskom podkupe: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda ot 10 fevralya 2000 g. / Plenum Verkhovnogo Suda RF // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF, 2000. № 4 (dokument utratil silu).
Aktual nye problemy protivodeystviya korruptsionnym prestupleniyam: Sbornik materialov Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (19 aprelya 2013 g., g. KHabarovsk) / V.A. Avdeev, O.A. Avdeeva, V.V. Agil din i dr.; pod red. T.B. Basovoy, K.A. Volkova; KHabarovskiy kraevoy sud, Dal nevostochnyy filial Rossiyskoy akademii pravosudiya. KHabarovsk: OOO Izdatel stvo YUrist , 2013. 200 s.
Anikin A.A. Posrednichestvo vo vzyatochnichestve. Zakonnost , 2009. № 3. S. 18-20.
Vasyukov V.V. Vidy souchastnikov v ugolovnom prave Rossii: dis. k.yu.n. SPb., 2008. 253 s.
Vasyukov V.V. Ponyatie posrednika i zakazchika. Zakonnost , 2006. S. 26-28.
Volzhenkin B.V. Sluzhebnye prestupleniya. M.: YUrist, 2000. 368 s.
Garbatovich D.A. Posrednichestvo vo vzyatochnichestve: preobrazovannyy vid posobnichestva. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2011, № 5. S. 4-8.
Grishaev P.I., Kriger G.A. Souchastie po ugolovnomu pravu. M., 1959. 255 s.
Ershov S.A. Posobnichestvo v Obshchey i Osobennoy chastyakh UK RF: dis. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.08. YAroslavl , 2014. 226 s.
Kapinus O.S. Izmeneniya v zakonodatel stve o dolzhnostnykh prestupleniyakh: voprosy kvalifikatsii i osvobozhdeniya vzyatkodatelya ot otvetstvennosti. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2011, № 2. S. 21-26.
Ozhegov S. I., SHvedova N. YU. Tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka: 80 000 slov i frazeologicheskikh vyrazheniy. Rossiyskaya akademiya nauk. Institut russkogo yazyka im. V.V. Vinogradova. 4-e izd., dopolnennoe. M.: Azbukovnik, 1997. 944 s.
Pluzhnikov A. V. Souchastie v Prestuplenii (Problema souchastiya obshchego i spetsial nogo sub ekta): dis. k.yu.n. Moskva, 2008. 153 s.
Tkachev I.V. Problemy realizatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za posrednichestvo vo vzyatochnichestve. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2012, № 2. S. 64-70.
Traynin A.N. Izbrannye trudy / Sostavlenie, vstupitel naya stat ya dokt. yurid. nauk, professora N. F. Kuznetsovoy. SPb.: Izdatel stvo YUridicheskiy tsentr Press , 2004. 898 s.
YAni P.S. Posrednichestvo vo vzyatochnichestve. Zakonnost , 2011, № 9. S. 12-18.
YAni P.S. Problemy kvalifikatsii posrednichestva vo vzyatochnichestve. Zakonnost , 2013. № 2. S. 24-29.
Ugolovnyy kodeks RSFSR Elektronnyy resurs : utverzhden Verkhovnym Sovetom RSFSR 27.10.1960. Dokument utratil silu. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o vzyatochnichestve i kommercheskom podkupe: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda ot 10 fevralya 2000 g. / Plenum Verkhovnogo Suda RF // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF, 2000. № 4 (dokument utratil silu).
Aktual nye problemy protivodeystviya korruptsionnym prestupleniyam: Sbornik materialov Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (19 aprelya 2013 g., g. KHabarovsk) / V.A. Avdeev, O.A. Avdeeva, V.V. Agil din i dr.; pod red. T.B. Basovoy, K.A. Volkova; KHabarovskiy kraevoy sud, Dal nevostochnyy filial Rossiyskoy akademii pravosudiya. KHabarovsk: OOO Izdatel stvo YUrist , 2013. 200 s.
Anikin A.A. Posrednichestvo vo vzyatochnichestve. Zakonnost , 2009. № 3. S. 18-20.
Vasyukov V.V. Vidy souchastnikov v ugolovnom prave Rossii: dis. k.yu.n. SPb., 2008. 253 s.
Vasyukov V.V. Ponyatie posrednika i zakazchika. Zakonnost , 2006. S. 26-28.
Volzhenkin B.V. Sluzhebnye prestupleniya. M.: YUrist, 2000. 368 s.
Garbatovich D.A. Posrednichestvo vo vzyatochnichestve: preobrazovannyy vid posobnichestva. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2011, № 5. S. 4-8.
Grishaev P.I., Kriger G.A. Souchastie po ugolovnomu pravu. M., 1959. 255 s.
Ershov S.A. Posobnichestvo v Obshchey i Osobennoy chastyakh UK RF: dis. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.08. YAroslavl , 2014. 226 s.
Kapinus O.S. Izmeneniya v zakonodatel stve o dolzhnostnykh prestupleniyakh: voprosy kvalifikatsii i osvobozhdeniya vzyatkodatelya ot otvetstvennosti. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2011, № 2. S. 21-26.
Ozhegov S. I., SHvedova N. YU. Tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka: 80 000 slov i frazeologicheskikh vyrazheniy. Rossiyskaya akademiya nauk. Institut russkogo yazyka im. V.V. Vinogradova. 4-e izd., dopolnennoe. M.: Azbukovnik, 1997. 944 s.
Pluzhnikov A. V. Souchastie v Prestuplenii (Problema souchastiya obshchego i spetsial nogo sub ekta): dis. k.yu.n. Moskva, 2008. 153 s.
Tkachev I.V. Problemy realizatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za posrednichestvo vo vzyatochnichestve. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2012, № 2. S. 64-70.
Traynin A.N. Izbrannye trudy / Sostavlenie, vstupitel naya stat ya dokt. yurid. nauk, professora N. F. Kuznetsovoy. SPb.: Izdatel stvo YUridicheskiy tsentr Press , 2004. 898 s.
YAni P.S. Posrednichestvo vo vzyatochnichestve. Zakonnost , 2011, № 9. S. 12-18.
YAni P.S. Problemy kvalifikatsii posrednichestva vo vzyatochnichestve. Zakonnost , 2013. № 2. S. 24-29.
Keywords:
intermediation in bribery, complicity in the crime, complicity, companiesto.
Related Articles
Work of Young Scientists Pages: 32-35 Issue №24668
On the Issue of Criminal Liability for Non-compliance Transport Security Requirements, Committed by a Group of Persons by Prior Agreement or Organized Group
criminal law
crimes
vehicles
traffic safety
legal and technical error
Show more
Criminal Law SCIENCES Pages: 53-61 DOI: 10.33693/2782-7372-2024-3-4-53-61 Issue №166277
On the Issue of Criteria for Criminal Groups
criminal policy
group
complicity
cohesion
stability
Show more
1. SCIENTIFIC SCHOOL OF DOCTOR OF SCIENCE, PROFESSOR RAROG A.I. Pages: 50-52 Issue №7594
Exceeding the limits of necessary defense. Is the complicity possible?
self-defense
complicity
companiesto
accomplice
the instigator
Show more
4. CRIMINAL LAW Pages: 69-74 Issue №20339
The Excess of the Perpetrator and Other Accomplices of the Crime: Gaps in Criminal Law Regulation and Prospects for Improvement
excess of the performer
complicity
accomplices in a crime
act
causal relationship
Show more
2. Theory and history of law and state; History of law and State teachings Pages: 52-56 Issue №3370
Zoroastrian law and the problem of classification of crimes
Avesta
crimes
criminal penalties
complicity
wine
Show more
CRIMINAL LAW Pages: 102-107 Issue №72283
Responsibility of the Organizer of the Crime: Problems of Qualification of Criminal Actions
complicity
the organizer of the crime
qualification of the crime
the leadership.
Show more
Уголовно-правовые науки (юридические науки) Pages: 139-151 Issue №108273
Comment on the Paradoxes of Scientific, Practical and Official Interpretations and Definitions of Legal Norms Using the Example of the Criminal Code of the Azerbaijan Republic
principles of law
scientific methodology
ideological conditionality
interpretation of legal norms
complicity
Show more
4. CRIMINAL - LEGAL, CRIMINOLOGICAL, ADMINISTRATIVE AND OTHER MEASURES FOR COUNTERING CRIME IN CONTEMPORARY CONDITIONS Pages: 112-116 Issue №20974
Problems of Sentencing for Complicity
sentencing
complicity
type of accomplice
organizer of crime
accomplice
Show more
3. Criminal law and criminology; Criminal enforcement law Pages: 89-91 Issue №4395
Differentiation of provocation of a crime from partnership institute
Provocation crimes
complicity in the crime
incitement
Show more
4. Criminal; Criminal enforcement law Pages: 106-110 Issue №3636
Theoretical bases of the interaction between Common and Specific parts of criminal code of RSFSR of 1960
the elements of the crime
principles of criminal law
plurality of crimes
the circumstances excluding criminality of act
stages of Commission of crime
Show more