Problems of qualification of crimes on the basis of the subjective side (crimes against life)
( Pp. 171-175)

The article concerns topical problems arising at qualification of crimes against life, in particular on the basis of the subjective side. Analyzes examples from judicial practice. The purpose of the article: the Present work aims at studying the problem of incorrect qualification on the example of specific crimes against life. It is necessary to reveal the contents and characteristics of the subjective side, its essential characteristics, to distinguish forms and types of guilt, to identify the rules that you want to use in the classification of these crimes on signs of the subjective side. Methodology and methods: the article uses a comparative legal research method, and the method of interpretation of legal norms that allow you to better comprehend the institutions of the criminal law and to determine the main directions of their development. Conclusions: the problem of qualification of crimes on the basis of the subjective side is relevant for the study, as evidenced by numerous decisions in criminal cases and the writings of scholars lawyers. Experts in the field of criminal law, in their research, draw our attention to the complexity of the Institute of guilt in connection with what law enforcers need to know to accurately identify and differentiate without exception, all components of the subjective side of crimes against life. The scope of application of the obtained results: this article may be of interest to students researching this area of criminal law, and can be used as additional training material for the interrogators, investigators, prosecutors and judges.

Lebedev M.V., (2016), PROBLEMS OF QUALIFICATION OF CRIMES ON THE BASIS OF THE SUBJECTIVE SIDE (CRIMES AGAINST LIFE). Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 171-175.

Bastrykin A.I. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Prakticheskiy kurs. Moskva. 2007g.
Gorbuza A.D. Smeshannaya forma viny po Sovetskomu ugolovnomu zakonodatel stvu. Avtoreferat kandidatskaya dissertatsiya Moskva. 1972g.
Dagel P.S., Kotov D.V. Sub ektivnaya storona prestupleniya i ee ustanovlenie. Voronezh, 1974g.
Duyunov V.K., KHlebushkin A.G. Kvalifikatsiya prestupleniy: zakonodatel stvo, teoriya, sudebnaya praktika. Moskva. 2012g.
Kozachenko A.B. Lzhegumannost suda ili o chem svidetel stvuyut kazusy. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. Ekaterinburg. 2014g.
Ugolovnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Obshchaya chast . Pod red. Komissarova V.S., Krylovoy N.E., Tyazhkovoy I.M. Moskva 2012g.
Makashvili V.G. O razgranichenii eventual nogo umysla i samonadeyannosti. Moskva. 1965g.
Nazarov A.D, Vliyanie sledstvennykh oshibok na oshibki suda. Moskva. 2002g.
Pitetskiy V. Suzhenie ponyatiya kosvennogo umysla vedet k uzhestocheniyu repressii. Krasnoyarsk 2012g.
Platonov K.K. Kratkiy slovar psikhologicheskikh ponyatiy. Moskva. 1984g.
Rarog A.I. Sub ektivnaya storona i kvalifikatsiya prestupleniy. Moskva. 2001g.
Sycheva O.V. Sudebnaya oshibka v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Ul yanovsk.2013g.
Traynin A. M. Sostavy prestupleniy po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. Moskva, 1951g.
Antonova G.I., (2014), Kriminal nyy analiz lichnosti prestupnika i zhertvy po prestupleniyam, predusmotrennymi st.111 UK RF. Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve, 1: 179-182.
Borovikov V.B., (2014), Voprosy kvalifikatsii nasil stvennykh prestupleniy. Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve, 3: 108-111.
SHelegov YU., (2015), O spetsifike otsenki kosvennykh dokazatel stv v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve, 6: 167-171.

Russia, criminal law, the subjective side of the crime, wine, crimes against life, qualification of crimes, error.