RECONCILIATION IN THE FAMILY LAW: A COMPARATIVE-LEGAL ANALYSIS OF RUSSIA AND FRANCE
( Pp. 225-226)
More about authors
Mirzoeva Gulaman Elmanovna
magistrant
Dagestan State University Alieva Zulfidzhat Zubayrievna kand. yurid. nauk. Dolzhnost: docent. Podrazdelenie: kafedra grazhdanskogo processa
Dagestan State University
Dagestan State University Alieva Zulfidzhat Zubayrievna kand. yurid. nauk. Dolzhnost: docent. Podrazdelenie: kafedra grazhdanskogo processa
Dagestan State University
Abstract:
The article by the Institute of family law as reconciliation on the basis of comparative-legal analysis in the legal framework of Russia and France. Objective: compare and analyze the institution of reconciliation in the family law of Russia and France. The following methods were used: comparative analysis and study of the legislation of the Russian Federation and France. Application results. The results of the work can be used in the activities of the legislature to consider alternative methods for resolving family disputes.
How to Cite:
Mirzoeva G.E., Alieva Z.Z., (2017), RECONCILIATION IN THE FAMILY LAW: A COMPARATIVE-LEGAL ANALYSIS OF RUSSIA AND FRANCE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 225-226.
Reference list:
Semeynyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 29.12.1995 № 223-FZ (red. ot 30.10.2017) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 1996. № 1. St. 16.
Federal nyy zakon ot 27.07.2010 № 193-FZ (red. ot 23.07.2013) Ob al ternativnoy protsedure uregulirovaniya sporov s uchastiem posrednika (protsedure mediatsii) (s izm. i dop., vstupayushchimi v silu s 01.09.2013) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2010. № 31. St. 4162.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 05.11.1998 № 15 (red. ot 06.02.2007) O primenenii sudami zakonodatel stva pri rassmotrenii del o rastorzhenii braka // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 1999. № 1.
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Frantsii (Kodeks Napoleona) Code civil des Francais (Code Napoleon) / Per. s frantsuzskogo Zakhvataeva V.N. M.: Izdatel stvo Infotropik Media , 2012. S. 4. 624 s.
Bakhareva O.A., Nikolaychenko O.V. Uregulirovanie semeynykh sporov posredstvom protsedury mediatsii // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. 2017. № 7. S. 32 - 36.
Bernam U. Pravovaya sistema SSHA. M.: Novaya yustitsiya, 2006.
Blakitnaya O.S. Primiritel nye protsedury po sporam s administrativnymi organami // Kontseptsiya razvitiya sudebnoy sistemy i sistemy dobrovol nogo i prinuditel nogo ispolneniya resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii, sudov obshchey yurisdiktsii, arbitrazhnykh, treteyskikh sudov i Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka: Sb. nauch. st. Krasnodar; SPb. 2007.
Makhov V.N., Vasilenko A.S., CHebukhanova L.V. Elementy vosstanovitel nogo pravosudiya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. YUridicheskie nauki. 2017. № 1. S. 107 - 121.
Ispol zovanie primiritel nykh protsedur dlya razresheniya grazhdanskikh del na primere stran kontinental noy Evropy (Velikobritaniya, Frantsiya, Germaniya) // YUridicheskiy mir. 2006. № 2. S. 65.
Okriashvili T.G., YAkupov A.G. Printsip dobrosovestnosti kak osnova chastnopravovykh otnosheniy: istoriko-pravovoy aspekt // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2015. № 4. S. 338-341.
Trofimets I.A. Rol advokata i mediatora v brakorazvodnom protsesse // Semeynoe i zhilishchnoe pravo. 2015. № 1. S. 26 - 30.
YAkupov A.G. Printsip protsessual noy dobrosovestnosti v rossiyskom prave // Innovatsionnye tekhnologii v obrazovanii i nauke: Sbornik materialov II Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Redkollegiya: O.N. SHirokov i dr. . 2017. S. 414-416.
Federal nyy zakon ot 27.07.2010 № 193-FZ (red. ot 23.07.2013) Ob al ternativnoy protsedure uregulirovaniya sporov s uchastiem posrednika (protsedure mediatsii) (s izm. i dop., vstupayushchimi v silu s 01.09.2013) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2010. № 31. St. 4162.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 05.11.1998 № 15 (red. ot 06.02.2007) O primenenii sudami zakonodatel stva pri rassmotrenii del o rastorzhenii braka // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 1999. № 1.
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Frantsii (Kodeks Napoleona) Code civil des Francais (Code Napoleon) / Per. s frantsuzskogo Zakhvataeva V.N. M.: Izdatel stvo Infotropik Media , 2012. S. 4. 624 s.
Bakhareva O.A., Nikolaychenko O.V. Uregulirovanie semeynykh sporov posredstvom protsedury mediatsii // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. 2017. № 7. S. 32 - 36.
Bernam U. Pravovaya sistema SSHA. M.: Novaya yustitsiya, 2006.
Blakitnaya O.S. Primiritel nye protsedury po sporam s administrativnymi organami // Kontseptsiya razvitiya sudebnoy sistemy i sistemy dobrovol nogo i prinuditel nogo ispolneniya resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii, sudov obshchey yurisdiktsii, arbitrazhnykh, treteyskikh sudov i Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka: Sb. nauch. st. Krasnodar; SPb. 2007.
Makhov V.N., Vasilenko A.S., CHebukhanova L.V. Elementy vosstanovitel nogo pravosudiya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. YUridicheskie nauki. 2017. № 1. S. 107 - 121.
Ispol zovanie primiritel nykh protsedur dlya razresheniya grazhdanskikh del na primere stran kontinental noy Evropy (Velikobritaniya, Frantsiya, Germaniya) // YUridicheskiy mir. 2006. № 2. S. 65.
Okriashvili T.G., YAkupov A.G. Printsip dobrosovestnosti kak osnova chastnopravovykh otnosheniy: istoriko-pravovoy aspekt // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2015. № 4. S. 338-341.
Trofimets I.A. Rol advokata i mediatora v brakorazvodnom protsesse // Semeynoe i zhilishchnoe pravo. 2015. № 1. S. 26 - 30.
YAkupov A.G. Printsip protsessual noy dobrosovestnosti v rossiyskom prave // Innovatsionnye tekhnologii v obrazovanii i nauke: Sbornik materialov II Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Redkollegiya: O.N. SHirokov i dr. . 2017. S. 414-416.
Keywords:
right, family law, reconciliation, legislation of Russia, the laws of France, reconciliation in family law, child, children.
