On the singularity of criminal legal counteraction to organized forms of extremism in Russia and the Republic of Kazakhstan
( Pp. 127-133)
More about authors
Zenkovsky Alexander Vladimirovich
sudya Severo-Kazahstanskogo oblastnogo suda v otstavke, pochetnyy rabotnik sudebnoy sistemy.
Tarasevich Ivan Anatolievich
chtec po hirotesii, kand. yurid. nauk, docent.
Tobolsk Theological Seminary
Tobolsk Theological Seminary
Abstract:
The author of the article tells readers about the shortcomings of the criminal law norms, which are aimed at combating extremist crimes in Russia and Kazakhstan. In particular, these shortcomings lie in the basic concepts. This topic is the main one in this scientific study. The author also analyzes the correlation of criminal norms and norms of special laws in Russia and Kazakhstan. In addition to researching the problems that exist in the Criminal Laws of these countries and dealing with the fight against extremism, the author of this work takes the aim of working out proposals on how to eliminate these problems. The novelty of this research is the author's method of eliminating the contradictions found in legislation. These legal problems are complex. Today it is necessary to improve certain definitions of the General Part of the Criminal Law of Russia, as well as its general structure. Basic research methods: comparative-legal, systemic and logical analysis. The article formulates the main criminal-right definitions. Formulations could not be done without the use of methods of synthesis, abstraction and concretization, analogy and modeling. The study also used empirical methods: formal legal analysis of normative acts and literature, study and generalization of scientific theory, and others. In general, the article notes that the criminal legislation of Kazakhstan on combating extremism is more balanced. It uses more precise formulations of relevant legal norms. The wording is made on the basis of universal concepts. This avoids significant contradictions between the norms of the General and Special Parts of the Criminal Law. This study is useful for representatives of law enforcement and legislative bodies of Russia and Kazakhstan. The methodological discoveries described in the article can be used in the construction of consolidated legislation of the Eurasian Economic Union.
How to Cite:
Zenkovsky A.V., Tarasevich I.A., (2017), ON THE SINGULARITY OF CRIMINAL LEGAL COUNTERACTION TO ORGANIZED FORMS OF EXTREMISM IN RUSSIA AND THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 127-133.
Reference list:
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 31.12.2015 № 683 O Strategii natsional noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. - 2016. № 1 (chast II). - St. 212.
Ukaz Prezidenta Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 24 sentyabrya 2013 goda № 648 O Gosudarstvennoy programme po protivodeystviyu religioznomu ekstremizmu i terrorizmu v Respublike Kazakhstan na 2013-2017 gody // Kazakhstanskaya pravda. - 2013. - № 286 (27560).
Kazakhstanskaya pravda. - 2009. - № 35-37 (25779-25781).
Kaufman M.A. Pravotvorcheskie oshibki v ugolovnom prave // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. - 2016. - № 9. - S. 92-101.
Klimenko YU.A. Organizatsiya ekstremistskogo soobshchestva (st. 282.1 UK RF): ob ekt prestupleniya i ego znachenie dlya kvalifikatsii // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. - 2016. - № 3. - S. 123-129. S. 127.
Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu Kodeksu Respubliki Kazakhstan. - Almaty, Izdatel stvo Norma-K , 2016. - 749 s.
Oshibki v Ugolovnom kodekse // Rossiyskaya gazeta. - 2010. - № 5205 (126).
Pishina S.G. Pravointerpretatsionnye oshibki: problemy teorii i praktiki: avtoref. dis kand. yur. nauk: 12.00.01. - N. Novgorod, 2000. - 176 s.
Rossiyskaya gazeta. - 2010. - № 130.
Slovar inostrannykh slov. 18-e izd. - Moskva: Russkiy yazyk , 1989. - 624 s.
Sobranie uzakoneniy RSFSR. - 1926. - № 80. - St. 600.
Tarasevich I.A. Konstitutsionno-pravovye osnovy religioznoy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii: dis. d-ra yurid. nauk: 12.00.02. - Tyumen , 2014. - 376 s.
Tikhonova S.S. Definitsii v ugolovnom zakonodatel stve Rossiyskoy Federatsii: sposoby postroeniya i pravila yuridiko-tekhnicheskogo oformleniya // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. - 2009. - № 2. - S. 194-200.
Tikhonova S.S. O kachestve sovremennogo ugolovnogo zakona: yuridiko-tekhnicheskiy aspekt novellizatsii UK RF // YUridicheskaya nauka i praktika. - 2013. - № 22. - S. 171-174.
Fridinskiy S.N. Protivodeystvie ekstremistskoy deyatel nosti (ekstremizmu) v Rossii (sotsial no-pravovoe i kriminologicheskoe issledovanie): dis.. d-ra yurid. nauk: 12.00.08. - M., 2011. - 366 s.
Ukaz Prezidenta Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 24 sentyabrya 2013 goda № 648 O Gosudarstvennoy programme po protivodeystviyu religioznomu ekstremizmu i terrorizmu v Respublike Kazakhstan na 2013-2017 gody // Kazakhstanskaya pravda. - 2013. - № 286 (27560).
Kazakhstanskaya pravda. - 2009. - № 35-37 (25779-25781).
Kaufman M.A. Pravotvorcheskie oshibki v ugolovnom prave // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. - 2016. - № 9. - S. 92-101.
Klimenko YU.A. Organizatsiya ekstremistskogo soobshchestva (st. 282.1 UK RF): ob ekt prestupleniya i ego znachenie dlya kvalifikatsii // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. - 2016. - № 3. - S. 123-129. S. 127.
Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu Kodeksu Respubliki Kazakhstan. - Almaty, Izdatel stvo Norma-K , 2016. - 749 s.
Oshibki v Ugolovnom kodekse // Rossiyskaya gazeta. - 2010. - № 5205 (126).
Pishina S.G. Pravointerpretatsionnye oshibki: problemy teorii i praktiki: avtoref. dis kand. yur. nauk: 12.00.01. - N. Novgorod, 2000. - 176 s.
Rossiyskaya gazeta. - 2010. - № 130.
Slovar inostrannykh slov. 18-e izd. - Moskva: Russkiy yazyk , 1989. - 624 s.
Sobranie uzakoneniy RSFSR. - 1926. - № 80. - St. 600.
Tarasevich I.A. Konstitutsionno-pravovye osnovy religioznoy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii: dis. d-ra yurid. nauk: 12.00.02. - Tyumen , 2014. - 376 s.
Tikhonova S.S. Definitsii v ugolovnom zakonodatel stve Rossiyskoy Federatsii: sposoby postroeniya i pravila yuridiko-tekhnicheskogo oformleniya // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. - 2009. - № 2. - S. 194-200.
Tikhonova S.S. O kachestve sovremennogo ugolovnogo zakona: yuridiko-tekhnicheskiy aspekt novellizatsii UK RF // YUridicheskaya nauka i praktika. - 2013. - № 22. - S. 171-174.
Fridinskiy S.N. Protivodeystvie ekstremistskoy deyatel nosti (ekstremizmu) v Rossii (sotsial no-pravovoe i kriminologicheskoe issledovanie): dis.. d-ra yurid. nauk: 12.00.08. - M., 2011. - 366 s.
Keywords:
extremist community, criminal community, terrorist community, extremism, terrorism, the object of the crime, qualification of crimes, social danger, Criminal law.
