To the issue of the object of crimes provided for in Article 327.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation
( Pp. 147-149)

The urgency of the problem and the purpose of the study. The urgency of the problem, pronounced in the title of the article, is the predetermined mandatory conduct of a permanent search for optimal legislative decisions, in particular, with reference to the institution regulating criminal liability for the illegal circulation of medicines and medical products. The formulation of this issue stipulates the need to refer to the objects of crimes, respectively, Article 3227.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. In this article, an attempt is made to critically comprehend the placements in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The methodological basis for the study include: principles of dialectical cognition of social reality; the provisions of a systematic approach to the analysis of socio-legal phenomena; methods of criminal law investigations. The main results of the study. We consider it appropriate to exclude Article 327.2 from the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and the norms incorporated by it should be envisaged in a new article 238.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation with the same name. Scientific and practical significance of the work lies in the fact that the findings contained therein, may be used to: - Improving the law-making and law-enforcement activities in the implementation of criminal law institution responsible for regulating the trafficking of drugs and medical devices; - Teaching courses in criminal law, law of higher and secondary educational institutions, as well as in-service training system; - In research work in the further development of the provisions related to the study of the Institute, responsible for regulating the trafficking of drugs and medical devices. This article is intended for students, graduate students, professors of law schools and law departments, law enforcement officials, legal practitioners, as well as for all those interested in issues relevant topics.

Ostapenko O.I., (2017), TO THE ISSUE OF THE OBJECT OF CRIMES PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 327.2 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 147-149.

Polenov G.F. Otvetstvennost za prestupleniya protiv poryadka upravleniya. M., 1966.
Postnikov V.S. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za poddelku, izgotovlenie, sbyt i ispol zovanie podlozhnykh dokumentov, shtampov, pechatey, blankov: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1990.
Sarukhanyan A.R. Prestupleniya protiv poryadka upravleniya: obshchaya kharakteristika, voprosy kvalifikatsii. Rostov-na-donu, 2012.
Polnyy kurs ugolovnogo prava: V 5 t. / pod redaktsiey Korobeeva A.I. T. V: Prestupleniya protiv gosudarstvennoy vlasti. Prestupleniya protiv voennoy sluzhby. Prestupleniya protiv mira i bezopasnosti chelovechestva. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo.

forged documents, medicines, medical device, the packaging of the medicines or medical devices.