COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE INSTITUTION OF INQUIRY AND PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
( Pp. 142-145)

More about authors
Khupsergenov Khachim Mukhamedovich kand. yurid. nauk. Dolzhnost: prepodavatel Podrazdelenie: kafedra organizacii pravoohranitelnoy deyatelnosti
Krasnodar University of MIA Russia. Ranch: North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies
Abstract:
Objective: the article presents a comparative legal analysis of the institution of inquiry and preliminary investigation in criminal procedure of the Russian Federation, because today one can hardly find more discussion in the Russian legal community, the question of what problems of reforming of pre-judicial production on criminal cases. Methodology: Area of study are the norms of the criminal procedural legislation, law enforcement practice, as well as scientific-practical and theoretical principles associated with the legal institutions of inquiry and preliminary investigation on criminal cases. Methodological basis of research is the dialectical method of scientific knowledge, as well as comparative-legal, systemic-structural, logical, historical, and other private-scientific methods of research of legal phenomena. Conclusions: the article provides the results of the offering on the basis of a comparative legal analysis a completely different approach to the essential definition of the inquiry Institute in criminal proceedings of Russia. The results of scientific articles will be useful for further understanding of the institutions of inquiry and preliminary investigation, as well as in the reform of pre-trial proceedings in criminal cases.
How to Cite:
Khupsergenov K.M., (2016), COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE INSTITUTION OF INQUIRY AND PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 142-145.
Reference list:
Azarenok N.V. Pred yavlenie obvineniya i uvedomlenie o podozrenii v ugolovnom protsesse // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2013. N 7.
Apostolova N.N. Reforma dosudebnogo proizvodstva v Rossii // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2013. № 11.
Vidanov A.M. Predvaritel noe rassledovanie v forme doznaniya: problemy zakonodatel nogo regulirovaniya // Rossiyskiy sud ya. 2013. № 9.
Golovko L.V. Kazakhstan: desovetizatsiya ugolovnogo protsessa. Stat ya 2. Unifikatsiya dosudebnogo rassledovaniya // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2012. № 1.
Michurina O.V. Kontseptsiya doznaniya v ugolovnom protsesse RF i problemy ee realizatsii v organakh vnutrennikh del: Avtoref. dis.. d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2008.
Panokin A.M. Doznanie v sokrashchennoy forme // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2014. N 5.
Ryabinina T.K. Doznanie - samostoyatel naya forma dosudebnogo proizvodstva // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2013. № 19.
Suprun S.V. Doznanie - sokrashchennoe sledstvie // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2010. № 5.
Ugolovno-protsessual noe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii: uchebnik / otv. red. P.A. Lupinskaya. M., 2009.
Ugolovnyy protsess: uchebnik / A.V. Smirnov, K.B. Kalinovskiy; pod obshch. red. prof. A.V. Smirnova. M., 2008.
KHupsergenov KH.M. Doznanie, kak uproshchennaya forma dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnym delam // Kazanskaya nauka. 2015. №10.
KHupsergenov KH.M. Istoriko-pravovye polozheniya stanovleniya i razvitiya instituta doznaniya v ugolovnom protsesse RF // Uspekhi sovremennoy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2016. № 6. T.5.
Keywords:
inquiry, a preliminary investigation, pre-trial proceedings in criminal cases.