THE UNCERTAINTY OF THE DISASTER AS THEORETICAL BASIS OF THE EXTENTION OF THE INSTITUTE’S INNOCENT OF HARM
( Pp. 262-266)
More about authors
Klyachin Vyacheslav Matveevich
kand. tehn. nauk. Dolzhnost: docent
Russia New University. Branch: Obninsk brach
Russia New University. Branch: Obninsk brach
Abstract:
The article is devoted to consideration of the provisions of the uncertainty of the disaster as the theoretical Foundation of the third form is innocent of harm. Disclosed is the thesis that if a person who committed a socially dangerous act and the circumstances of the case caught in the uncertainty of the disaster, could not understand and anticipate the social danger of his actions (inaction), and equally to prevent their effects in virtue of the impossibility of objective assessment of the events, then his deeds should be recognized innocent.
How to Cite:
Klyachin V.M., (2016), THE UNCERTAINTY OF THE DISASTER AS THEORETICAL BASIS OF THE EXTENTION OF THE INSTITUTE’S INNOCENT OF HARM. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 262-266.
Reference list:
Arnol d V.I. Teoriya katastrof. Izd. 5-e - M.: Editorial URSS, 2009. 136 s.
Anfilatov V.S.i dr. Sistemnyy analiz v upravlenii: Uch. pos. / Pod red. A.A. Emel yanova. M.: Finansy i statistika, 2003. S. 153.
Archibasova L. A. Nevinovnoe prichinenie vreda: diss. k.yu.n. : 12.00.08. Omsk. Omskaya akademiya MVD Rossii. 2005. - 209 s.
Berestennikov A.G. Evolyutsiya sanktsiy v ugolovnom prave Rossii VIII - XX vv.: ot printsipa neopredelennosti k vsestoronney normativnoy reglamentatsii // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve, Vypusk № 2. 2016, str 66-71.
Dyatlov A.S. CHernobyl . Kak eto bylo. M. Nauchtekhlitizdat. 2003. S. 4.
Nazarenko T.N. Neopredelennost v rossiyskom prave: diss. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.01. - Moskva, 2006. 227 s. RGB OD, 61:06-12/461; sm. takzhe: Demin A.V. Neopredelennost v nalogovom prave i pravovye sredstva ee preodoleniya: Monografiya / A.V. Demin: RIOR: Infra-M, pech. 2012. - 245 s.
Klyachin V.M. Metodologicheskie problemy prava v sfere neopredelennosti // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. Vyp. 3 (70). Moskva, 2014. S. 99-101.
Klyachin V.M. Problemy ekstremal nogo prava v sfere katastrof // Biznes v zakone. 2014. № 2 S. 309-311.
Kravtsova E.A., Maksimenko A.V., SHalaykin R.N. Rol i polnomochiya gosudarstvennykh organov pri vozniknovenii chrezvychaynykh situatsiy // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve - Vypusk № 2. 2016, str. 100-103.
Kommentariy k UK RF (nauch.-prakt., post.). 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. / pod red. d.yu.n., prof. S.V. D yakova, d.yu.n. N.G. Kadnikova. - M.: YUrisprudentsiya, 2013. S. 74.
Rekechinskaya L.B. Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost za vred, prichinennyy istochnikom povyshennoy opasnosti // YUzhnoural skiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. 2002. - 3-4 (22-23).
Smil V. Global nye katastrofy i trendy: Sleduyushchie 50 let. - M.: AST PRESS KNIKA, 2012. S. 361.
Tikhonov M.N., Rylov M.I. : Ukaz. soch. S. 2-28
Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. - Information and Control, 1965, Vol. 8 N 3, pp. 338-353. Kofman A. Vvedenie v teoriyu nechetkikh mnozhestv. M.: Radio i svyaz , 1982. - 432 s.
Anfilatov V.S.i dr. Sistemnyy analiz v upravlenii: Uch. pos. / Pod red. A.A. Emel yanova. M.: Finansy i statistika, 2003. S. 153.
Archibasova L. A. Nevinovnoe prichinenie vreda: diss. k.yu.n. : 12.00.08. Omsk. Omskaya akademiya MVD Rossii. 2005. - 209 s.
Berestennikov A.G. Evolyutsiya sanktsiy v ugolovnom prave Rossii VIII - XX vv.: ot printsipa neopredelennosti k vsestoronney normativnoy reglamentatsii // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve, Vypusk № 2. 2016, str 66-71.
Dyatlov A.S. CHernobyl . Kak eto bylo. M. Nauchtekhlitizdat. 2003. S. 4.
Nazarenko T.N. Neopredelennost v rossiyskom prave: diss. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.01. - Moskva, 2006. 227 s. RGB OD, 61:06-12/461; sm. takzhe: Demin A.V. Neopredelennost v nalogovom prave i pravovye sredstva ee preodoleniya: Monografiya / A.V. Demin: RIOR: Infra-M, pech. 2012. - 245 s.
Klyachin V.M. Metodologicheskie problemy prava v sfere neopredelennosti // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. Vyp. 3 (70). Moskva, 2014. S. 99-101.
Klyachin V.M. Problemy ekstremal nogo prava v sfere katastrof // Biznes v zakone. 2014. № 2 S. 309-311.
Kravtsova E.A., Maksimenko A.V., SHalaykin R.N. Rol i polnomochiya gosudarstvennykh organov pri vozniknovenii chrezvychaynykh situatsiy // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve - Vypusk № 2. 2016, str. 100-103.
Kommentariy k UK RF (nauch.-prakt., post.). 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. / pod red. d.yu.n., prof. S.V. D yakova, d.yu.n. N.G. Kadnikova. - M.: YUrisprudentsiya, 2013. S. 74.
Rekechinskaya L.B. Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost za vred, prichinennyy istochnikom povyshennoy opasnosti // YUzhnoural skiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. 2002. - 3-4 (22-23).
Smil V. Global nye katastrofy i trendy: Sleduyushchie 50 let. - M.: AST PRESS KNIKA, 2012. S. 361.
Tikhonov M.N., Rylov M.I. : Ukaz. soch. S. 2-28
Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. - Information and Control, 1965, Vol. 8 N 3, pp. 338-353. Kofman A. Vvedenie v teoriyu nechetkikh mnozhestv. M.: Radio i svyaz , 1982. - 432 s.
Keywords:
infliction of damage, absolute uncertainty, radiation disaster, nuclear power stations, socially dangerous act.
Related Articles
5.1.2. PUBLIC LAW (STATE LAW) Pages: 114-117 Issue №20773
Problematic Aspects of Juvenile Differentiation and Integration Responsibility in Public Law Branches
specialization responsibility
differentiated responsibility
juvenile offender
socially dangerous act
educational impact
Show more
