THEFT OF ITEMS OF PARTICULAR VALUE: PROBLEMS OF DESCRIPTION OF THE FEATURES OF THE LEGISLATIVE OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE
( Pp. 103-106)
More about authors
Karpova Nataliya A.
kandidat yuridicheskih nauk, docent kafedry ugolovnogo prava
Moscow State University named after V.Y. Kikot Kalininskaya Yana S. kandidat yuridicheskih nauk, starshiy prepodavatel kafedry ugolovnogo prava
Moscow State University named after V.Y. Kikot
Moscow State University named after V.Y. Kikot Kalininskaya Yana S. kandidat yuridicheskih nauk, starshiy prepodavatel kafedry ugolovnogo prava
Moscow State University named after V.Y. Kikot
Abstract:
In the article the discussion in the theory of criminal law issues concerning descriptions of the features of the legislative objective evidence of theft of items of particular value. Analyzes the scientific point of view, the problem of implementation of criminal law in the protection of cultural values, formulated proposals to increase its effectiveness.
How to Cite:
Karpova N.A., Kalininskaya Y.S., (2015), THEFT OF ITEMS OF PARTICULAR VALUE: PROBLEMS OF DESCRIPTION OF THE FEATURES OF THE LEGISLATIVE OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 103-106.
Reference list:
Budanova E.A., Budanov S.A. Problemy kvalifikatsii khishcheniya predmetov, imeyushchikh osobuyu tsennost // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2013. № 2. S. 154-157.
Galuzin A.F. O nekotorykh problemakh (probelakh) obespecheniya pravovoy bezopasnosti v realizatsii konstitutsionnogo prava na bezopasnost kul turnykh tsennostey // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2008. № 1. S. 36-38.
Davletshina O.V. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana kul turnykh tsennostey v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Rostov-na-Donu, 2003. S. 52-53.
Danilov A.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za khishchenie predmetov, imeyushchikh osobuyu nauchnuyu, kul turnuyu, istoricheskuyu i khudozhestvennuyu tsennost // Probely v rossiyskom ugolovnom zakonodatel stve. 2008. № 1. S. 205-206.
Derbok Z.G. Zakonodatel noe opisanie ob ektivnoy storony spetsial nykh vidov khishcheniya i vymogatel stva: problema ego sovershenstvovaniya // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2014. № 13. S. 23 - 27.
Kalininskaya YA.S., CHugunov A.A. Razgranichenie sostavov prestupleniy, predusmotrennykh stat yami 214, 243 i 244 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: ob ektivnye kriterii//Sovremennoe pravo. 2015. № 7. S.106-109.
Karpova N.A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za karmannuyu krazhu: uchebnoe posobie. M.: Moskovskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2009. S. 28-29.
Klebanov L.R. Prestupleniya protiv arkheologicheskogo naslediya: ponyatie, priznaki, vidy, osobennosti kvalifikatsii (okonchanie) // Biznes v zakone. 2014. № 4. S. 34-37.
Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii: v 2 t. (postateynyy). T. 1. 2-e izd. / Pod red. A.V. Brilliantova. - M.: Prospekt, 2015. S. 367.
Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Otv. red. A.I. Rarog. - M.: Prospekt, 2015. S. 300 - 302 (avtor glavy - A.I. Rarog).
Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo: Uchebnik: V 2 t. / Pod red. E.F. Pobegaylo. M., 2008. T. 2: Osobennaya chast . S. 240.
Kochoi S.M. Otvetstvennost za korystnye prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti. - M.: Anteya, 2000. S. 210; Sabitov T.R. Okhrana kul turnykh tsennostey: ugolovno-pravovoy i kriminologicheskiy aspekty. Novosibirsk, 2004. S. 76 - 77.
Kulygin V.V. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana kul turnykh tsennostey: Monografiya. - M.: YUrist, 2006. S. 58-60.
Lopashenko N.A. Posyagatel stva na sobstvennost : monografiya. - M.: Norma, Infra-M, 2012. S. 397-400.
SHCHerba S.P., Pridanov S.A. Prestupleniya, posyagayushchie na kul turnye tsennosti Rossii: kvalifikatsiya i rassledovanie. - M., 2002. S. 81.
Galuzin A.F. O nekotorykh problemakh (probelakh) obespecheniya pravovoy bezopasnosti v realizatsii konstitutsionnogo prava na bezopasnost kul turnykh tsennostey // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2008. № 1. S. 36-38.
Davletshina O.V. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana kul turnykh tsennostey v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Rostov-na-Donu, 2003. S. 52-53.
Danilov A.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za khishchenie predmetov, imeyushchikh osobuyu nauchnuyu, kul turnuyu, istoricheskuyu i khudozhestvennuyu tsennost // Probely v rossiyskom ugolovnom zakonodatel stve. 2008. № 1. S. 205-206.
Derbok Z.G. Zakonodatel noe opisanie ob ektivnoy storony spetsial nykh vidov khishcheniya i vymogatel stva: problema ego sovershenstvovaniya // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2014. № 13. S. 23 - 27.
Kalininskaya YA.S., CHugunov A.A. Razgranichenie sostavov prestupleniy, predusmotrennykh stat yami 214, 243 i 244 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: ob ektivnye kriterii//Sovremennoe pravo. 2015. № 7. S.106-109.
Karpova N.A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za karmannuyu krazhu: uchebnoe posobie. M.: Moskovskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2009. S. 28-29.
Klebanov L.R. Prestupleniya protiv arkheologicheskogo naslediya: ponyatie, priznaki, vidy, osobennosti kvalifikatsii (okonchanie) // Biznes v zakone. 2014. № 4. S. 34-37.
Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii: v 2 t. (postateynyy). T. 1. 2-e izd. / Pod red. A.V. Brilliantova. - M.: Prospekt, 2015. S. 367.
Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Otv. red. A.I. Rarog. - M.: Prospekt, 2015. S. 300 - 302 (avtor glavy - A.I. Rarog).
Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo: Uchebnik: V 2 t. / Pod red. E.F. Pobegaylo. M., 2008. T. 2: Osobennaya chast . S. 240.
Kochoi S.M. Otvetstvennost za korystnye prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti. - M.: Anteya, 2000. S. 210; Sabitov T.R. Okhrana kul turnykh tsennostey: ugolovno-pravovoy i kriminologicheskiy aspekty. Novosibirsk, 2004. S. 76 - 77.
Kulygin V.V. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana kul turnykh tsennostey: Monografiya. - M.: YUrist, 2006. S. 58-60.
Lopashenko N.A. Posyagatel stva na sobstvennost : monografiya. - M.: Norma, Infra-M, 2012. S. 397-400.
SHCHerba S.P., Pridanov S.A. Prestupleniya, posyagayushchie na kul turnye tsennosti Rossii: kvalifikatsiya i rassledovanie. - M., 2002. S. 81.
Keywords:
theft, the offense, the subject of crime, items, of particular value, objective evidence, cultural values.
Related Articles
1. SCIENTIFIC SCHOOL OF DOCTOR OF SCIENCE, PROFESSOR LOPASHENKO N.A. Pages: 24-28 Issue №10864
REVISITING THE NON-CASH FINANCES AS A CRIME TARGET
the subject of crime
crimes against property
theft
the non-cash money
Show more
9. CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY; CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT LAW 12.00.08 Pages: 224-226 Issue №18348
Problems of application of criminal law norms establishing responsibility for smuggling in Russia, and ways to overcome them
smuggling
Customs Union
illegal movement
customs border of the EAEU
strategically important goods and resources
Show more
5. Criminal; Criminal enforcement law Pages: 140-144 Issue №4285
ON THE ISSUE OF CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN TERMS “OFFICIAL DOCUMENT” AND “IMPORTANT PERSONAL DOCUMENT”
criminal law
the subject of crime
official document
important personal document
crimes against a management order
Show more
11. Criminal law and criminology; Criminal enforcement law Pages: 145-148 Issue №10621
CRIMINAL AND LEGAL CHARACTERISTIC AND PROBLEMS OF FRAUD QUALIFICATION WITH PAYMENT CARDS USAGE
theft
fraud
fraud using payment cards
problems of qualification of crimes
the judicial practice of application of norms
Show more
7. Criminal law, Criminal enforcement law, Criminology Pages: 160-162 Issue №8046
On the problem of the definition of the generic and specific object of the offense under Art. 159.6 of the Criminal Code
crime
fraud
computer information
the offense
a generic object
Show more
5. Criminal; Criminal enforcement law Pages: 149-153 Issue №4285
The correspondence of the institute of criminal law action in time and the moment of perpetration the crime
the effect of the criminal law in time
the time of the crime
the offense
Show more
6. Criminology Pages: 154-156 Issue №4285
Objective evidence of illicit trafficking potent or toxic substances in order to market
objective evidence
the subject of crime
potent substances
poisonous substances
nutritional supplements
Show more
6. Criminology Pages: 172-178 Issue №3132
RULES OF CONSTRUCTION QUALIFYING AND PREFERRED ELEMENTS OF THE CRIME
differentiation of the criminal liability
qualifying features
privilegiada signs
the offense
Show more
11. Criminal law and criminology; Criminal enforcement law Pages: 157-161 Issue №10621
SELFISH GOAL AS A SIGN OF THEFT IN THE CRIMINAL LAW OF RUSSIA: DISPUTABLE QUESTIONS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE
theft
selfish purpose
the powers of the owner of the property
enrichment
the property benefits
Show more
9. CORRUPTION, TERRORISM, CRIMINAL PROCESS Pages: 139-142 Issue №5143
ILLEGAL ACCESS TO INFORMATION (ARTICLE 272 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE): CRIMINAL LAW CHARACTERISTICS AND SOME FEATURES OF THE INVESTIGATION
The investigator
investigation
Bank Deposit
unauthorized access
computer information
Show more
