TO THE QUESTION ABOUT THE ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUE PRECLUSION
( Pp. 192-194)
More about authors
Muravetskaya Irina Nikolaevna
aspirant. Mesto ucheby: Rostovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet putey soobscheniya. Podrazdelenie: kafedra grazhdanskogo prava i processa.
Rostov state transport University
Rostov state transport University
Abstract:
The article deals with topical issues of Institute of issue preclusion in administrative proceedings. According to judicial practice and makes proposals for the application of issue preclusion in the process of proof in administrative cases.
How to Cite:
Muravetskaya I.N., (2015), TO THE QUESTION ABOUT THE ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUE PRECLUSION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 192-194.
Reference list:
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 № 195-FZ// Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2002. № 1 (ch. 1), st. 1.
Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.12.2001 № 174-FZ// Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF.2001. № 52 (ch. I). St. 492
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ// Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF.1996. № 25. St. 2954.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 21 dekabrya 2011 g. N 30-P//Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2012, № 2, st. 398.
Postanovlenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 05.12.2014 N 18-AD14-66// SPS Konsul tantPlyus Postanovlenie suda YAmalo-Nenetskogo avtonomnogo okruga ot 10 iyulya 2013 g. N 4A-139/2013// SPS Konsul tantPlyus
Reshenie Murmanskogo oblastnogo suda ot 14 fevralya 2012 g. N 21-20//SPS Konsul tantPlyus
Babaev V.K. Prezumptsii v sovetskom prave. S. 37.
Onokolov YU.P. Rasshirenie primeneniya administrativnoy preyuditsii povysit preventivnoe vozdeystvie Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh i Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Migratsionnoe pravo. 2013. N 3. S. 11 - 15.
Prezumptsii v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve / Nauch. red. V.V. YArkov. M., 2006. S. 148.
Smirnov A.V., Kalinovskiy K.B. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. M., 2009.
CHechina N.A. Otvet R.F. Kallistratovoy // Vestnik Leningradskogo universiteta. 1954. N 12. Vyp. 4. S. 196.
SHmaliy O.V. Problemy sudebnogo poznaniya po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v sfere antimonopol nogo zakonodatel stva// Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel stvo; pravo i upravlenie. 2012. №11.
YArkov V.V. Grazhdanskiy protsess. 3-e izd. pererab. i dop. M.: BEK, 2000. S. 181
Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.12.2001 № 174-FZ// Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF.2001. № 52 (ch. I). St. 492
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ// Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF.1996. № 25. St. 2954.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 21 dekabrya 2011 g. N 30-P//Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2012, № 2, st. 398.
Postanovlenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 05.12.2014 N 18-AD14-66// SPS Konsul tantPlyus Postanovlenie suda YAmalo-Nenetskogo avtonomnogo okruga ot 10 iyulya 2013 g. N 4A-139/2013// SPS Konsul tantPlyus
Reshenie Murmanskogo oblastnogo suda ot 14 fevralya 2012 g. N 21-20//SPS Konsul tantPlyus
Babaev V.K. Prezumptsii v sovetskom prave. S. 37.
Onokolov YU.P. Rasshirenie primeneniya administrativnoy preyuditsii povysit preventivnoe vozdeystvie Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh i Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Migratsionnoe pravo. 2013. N 3. S. 11 - 15.
Prezumptsii v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve / Nauch. red. V.V. YArkov. M., 2006. S. 148.
Smirnov A.V., Kalinovskiy K.B. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. M., 2009.
CHechina N.A. Otvet R.F. Kallistratovoy // Vestnik Leningradskogo universiteta. 1954. N 12. Vyp. 4. S. 196.
SHmaliy O.V. Problemy sudebnogo poznaniya po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v sfere antimonopol nogo zakonodatel stva// Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel stvo; pravo i upravlenie. 2012. №11.
YArkov V.V. Grazhdanskiy protsess. 3-e izd. pererab. i dop. M.: BEK, 2000. S. 181
Keywords:
prejudice, the administrative process, proof.
Related Articles
PRIVATE LAW (CIVIL) SCIENCES Pages: 38-42 Issue №150029
Legal Aspects of Using Electronic Documents as Evidence in Civil Proceedings
evidence
civil procedure
civil procedural law
proof
electronic documents
Show more
7. CRIMINAL LAW (5.1.4.) Pages: 342-348 Issue №21729
From Polygraph to New Technologies, Detection of Perjury in Criminal Proceedings
polygraph
proof
conclusion of a polygraph examiner
admissibility of evidence
evaluation of evidence
Show more
7. Criminal procedure Pages: 162-165 Issue №4285
On the concept of criminal procedure evidence in the context of electronic information
proof
the fact
means of proof
source of evidence
Show more
7. CRIMINAL PROCESS (12.00.09) Pages: 219-222 Issue №17401
Some features of evidence in the investigation of crimes committed by minors
minors
criminal case
evidence
investigation
proof
Show more
6. Criminal procedure Pages: 189-192 Issue №3636
LEGISLATIVE FASTENING OF THE NEW OPERATIVELY-SEARCH EVENTS WHICH MUST BE SAVED UP BY PRACTICE
the law
the norm
legislation
operatively-search activity
using the results
Show more
7. Criminal procedure Pages: 201-207 Issue №3132
Forensic tactics in proving criminal cases Illicit Trafficking in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances
proof
proof
criminal proceedings
illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances
the judicial investigation
Show more
8. Criminal procedure Pages: 194-196 Issue №8046
To the question of overcoming prejudice in criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation
criminal proceedings
validity
the sentence
proof
prejudice
Show more
8. Forensics; Forensic expertise; Operational and search activities Pages: 174-177 Issue №4285
To a question about the kinds of subjects and combating crimes investigation
the opposition
investigation
proof
trial
Show more
7. Criminal law, Criminal enforcement law, Criminology Pages: 193-196 Issue №4088
PROBLEM LEGAL NATURE OF THE STAGE OF INITIATE CRIMINAL PROCEEDING
the stage of excitation of criminal case
the availability of criminal justice
proof
sources of evidence
Show more
13. Judicial, prosecutorial, human rights and law enforcement activities Pages: 203-206 Issue №3758
On the intersectoral regulation of circumstances to be proved at the stage of sentence execution
the sentence
proof
cross-sectoral regulation
the circumstances to be proven
Show more