The question of the importance of preparing civil matters for consideration
( Pp. 66-69)
More about authors
Koncheva Valentina A.
andidat yuridicheskih nauk, starshiy prepodavatel kafedry grazhdanskogo prava i processa i mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Abstract:
The article deals with the role preparation in civil proceedings. Briefly examines the question of activity of court in the preparation of civil cases for consideration. This article explores some possibilities for regulatory development stage. The author explores EU legislation, gives examples of the regulation of civil procedural relations in the UK, France and Germany. Assessment of development of modern legal regulation under preparation in civil proceedings regarding the legislation of the Soviet period is done. he author agrees with the position of some researchers about the greater importance of the preparation stage in the civil process rather than simply ensuring the efficiency of the hearing. This stage defines subsequent civil cases. A necessary condition for quality training needs to be a sufficient activity of the court.
How to Cite:
Koncheva V.A., (2016), THE QUESTION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF PREPARING CIVIL MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 66-69.
Reference list:
Artem eva YU.A. Stadii dokazyvaniya v arbitrazhnom protsesse. Nauchnyy zhurnal Aprobatsiya . №7 (34) 2015g. S. 24-26.
Bekyasheva D.I. Podgotovka dela k sudebnomu razbiratel stvu i ee znachenie na sovremennom etape razvitiya grazhdanskogo protsessual nogo prava // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. 2012. N 3. S. 18 - 22. SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Belyakova A.V. Mekhanizmy sudebnoy i vnesudebnoy zashchity prava na sudoproizvodstvo v razumnyy srok: monografiya. M.: YUstitsinform, 2016. - 168 s. SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
D yakonova O.G. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie osobennosti pravovoy reglamentatsii stadii podgotovki dela k sudebnomu razbiratel stvu v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom sudoproizvodstve // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. 2015. N 8. S. 14 - 19, SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Koncheva V.A. Eshche raz o protsessual noy forme. // Aktual nye problemy yuridicheskoy nauki: teoriya i praktika: sbornik materialov 17-y mezhdunarodnoy nauch.-prakt. konf. - Makhachkala: OOO Aprobatsiya . 2016. S. 109 - 110.
Koncheva V.A. Pravovoe regulirovanie stadii podgotovki v grazhdanskom protsesse Evropeyskogo Soyuza. // Aprobatsiya. № 4(19). 2014. S. 146 - 148.
Endryus N. Sistema grazhdanskogo protsessa Anglii: sudeb. razbiratel stvo, mediatsiya i arbitrazh. Per. s angl. Pod red. R.M. KHodykina. Kembridzhskiy un-t. - M.: Infotropik Media. 2012. - 544 s.
Konventsiya o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod (Rim, 1950 g.) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2001. N 2. St. 163.
Rekomendatsiya № R (84) 5 komiteta ministrov Soveta Evropy gosudarstvam-chlenam O printsipakh grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva, napravlennykh na usovershenstvovanie sudebnoy sistemy ( 28 fevralya 1984 goda) // SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Grazhdanskiy protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot; ot 14.11.2002 N 138-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2002. N 46. St. 4532.
Grazhdanskiy protsessual nyy kodeks FRG // RGBL. S.83.
Grazhdanskiy protsessual nyy kodeks RSFSR 1964 g. // Vedomosti VS RSFSR. 1964. N 24. St. 407.
Grazhdanskiy protsessual nyy kodeks RSFSR 1923 g. Utv. Postanovleniem VTSIK ot 10 iyulya 1923 g. // SU RSFSR. 1923. N 46 - 47. St. 478.
Novyy Grazhdanskiy protsessual nyy kodeks Frantsii / Per. s fr. V. Zakhvataeva; otv. red. A. Dovgert. - Kiev: Istina. 2004. - 544 s.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24.06.2008 N 11 quot;O podgotovke grazhdanskikh del k sudebnomu razbiratel stvu quot; // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF, N 9, sentyabr , 2008.
Bekyasheva D.I. Podgotovka dela k sudebnomu razbiratel stvu i ee znachenie na sovremennom etape razvitiya grazhdanskogo protsessual nogo prava // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. 2012. N 3. S. 18 - 22. SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Belyakova A.V. Mekhanizmy sudebnoy i vnesudebnoy zashchity prava na sudoproizvodstvo v razumnyy srok: monografiya. M.: YUstitsinform, 2016. - 168 s. SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
D yakonova O.G. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie osobennosti pravovoy reglamentatsii stadii podgotovki dela k sudebnomu razbiratel stvu v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom sudoproizvodstve // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. 2015. N 8. S. 14 - 19, SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Koncheva V.A. Eshche raz o protsessual noy forme. // Aktual nye problemy yuridicheskoy nauki: teoriya i praktika: sbornik materialov 17-y mezhdunarodnoy nauch.-prakt. konf. - Makhachkala: OOO Aprobatsiya . 2016. S. 109 - 110.
Koncheva V.A. Pravovoe regulirovanie stadii podgotovki v grazhdanskom protsesse Evropeyskogo Soyuza. // Aprobatsiya. № 4(19). 2014. S. 146 - 148.
Endryus N. Sistema grazhdanskogo protsessa Anglii: sudeb. razbiratel stvo, mediatsiya i arbitrazh. Per. s angl. Pod red. R.M. KHodykina. Kembridzhskiy un-t. - M.: Infotropik Media. 2012. - 544 s.
Konventsiya o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod (Rim, 1950 g.) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2001. N 2. St. 163.
Rekomendatsiya № R (84) 5 komiteta ministrov Soveta Evropy gosudarstvam-chlenam O printsipakh grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva, napravlennykh na usovershenstvovanie sudebnoy sistemy ( 28 fevralya 1984 goda) // SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Grazhdanskiy protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot; ot 14.11.2002 N 138-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2002. N 46. St. 4532.
Grazhdanskiy protsessual nyy kodeks FRG // RGBL. S.83.
Grazhdanskiy protsessual nyy kodeks RSFSR 1964 g. // Vedomosti VS RSFSR. 1964. N 24. St. 407.
Grazhdanskiy protsessual nyy kodeks RSFSR 1923 g. Utv. Postanovleniem VTSIK ot 10 iyulya 1923 g. // SU RSFSR. 1923. N 46 - 47. St. 478.
Novyy Grazhdanskiy protsessual nyy kodeks Frantsii / Per. s fr. V. Zakhvataeva; otv. red. A. Dovgert. - Kiev: Istina. 2004. - 544 s.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24.06.2008 N 11 quot;O podgotovke grazhdanskikh del k sudebnomu razbiratel stvu quot; // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF, N 9, sentyabr , 2008.
Keywords:
preparation of civil cases, disclosure, tasks of civil proceedings, the efficiency of the proceedings, civil process in the European Union, the activity of the court.
