Amendments to the legal regulation of jurisdiction of cases to commercial courts on grounds of the adoption of the Federal law No. 409-FZ.dtd. 29.12.2015
( Pp. 216-219)

The authors of the article have conducted a research of legislative innovations on jurisdiction of cases to commercial courts on grounds of the adoption and entry into legal force of the Federal law No. 409-FZ dtd. 29.12.2015 “On amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation and the annulment of paragraph 3, part 1, article 6 of the Federal Law “Concerning self-regulatory organizations” in connection with the adoption of the Federal Law “On arbitration (arbitral proceedings) in the Russian Federation”. This work is one of the first publications, which estimates new rules to differentiate the jurisdiction of corporate disputes between commercial and arbitration courts; as well as the provisions of the Federal Law №409-FZ dtd. 29.12.2015 on the extension of the competence of commercial courts by referring the disputes arising from the public companies’ activity and issues on assisting arbitration courts in disputes, arising from the implementation of entrepreneurial and other economic activity” to commercial courts. The range of problems perceived by the authors can find its further coverage in publications addressing the differentiation of jurisdiction of legal affairs between commercial and arbitration courts. This work is intended for the authors whose studies address theoretical and practical aspects of jurisdiction of cases to commercial courts, as well as for a wide range of legal practitioners, whose field of interest is related to arbitration proceedings.

Burova I.L., Lebedeva N.N., (2016), AMENDMENTS TO THE LEGAL REGULATION OF JURISDICTION OF CASES TO COMMERCIAL COURTS ON GROUNDS OF THE ADOPTION OF THE FEDERAL LAW NO. 409-FZ.DTD. 29.12.2015. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 216-219.

Konventsiya OON O priznanii i privedenii v ispolnenie inostrannykh arbitrazhnykh resheniy . Zaklyuchena v N yu-Yorke v 1958g. //Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF. 1993 g. №8;
Evropeyskaya Konventsiya o vneshnetorgovom arbitrazhe. Zaklyuchena v ZHeneve 21.04.1961g. //Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF. 1993. №10;
Tipovoy zakon quot;O mezhdunarodnom torgovom arbitrazhe quot; // Komissiya OON po pravu mezhdunarodnoy torgovli. Ezhegodnik. 1985 god. T. XVI.- N yu-York: Organizatsiya Ob edinennykh Natsiy, 1988. S. 601 - 612.;
Federal nyy zakon N 382-FZ ot 29.12.2015g. quot;Ob arbitrazhe (treteyskom razbiratel stve) v Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot; // Rossiyskaya gazeta, N 297, 31.12.2015.
Federal nyy zakon №409-FZ quot;O vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel nye zakonodatel nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii i priznanii utrativshim silu punkta 3 chasti 1 stat i 6 Federal nogo zakona quot;O samoreguliruemykh organizatsiyakh quot; v svyazi s prinyatiem Federal nogo zakona quot;Ob arbitrazhe (treteyskom razbiratel stve) v Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot; // Rossiyskaya gazeta, N 297, 31.12.2015.
Burova I.L. Podvedomstvennost dela arbitrazhnym sudam. Vladivostok: Izd-vo DVGTU, 2008. S.25.
Gabov A.V. Podvedomstvennost korporativnykh sporov treteyskim sudam (k diskussii o proektakh zakonov, napravlennykh na reformirovanie zakonodatel stva o treteyskikh sudakh) // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava , 2015, №3, s.46-57
Levanova N., Sariya G. Treteyskoe razbiratel stvo korporativnykh sporov //Samoupravlenie, Izd-vo: Vol noe ekonomicheskoe obshchestvo Moskvy, 2012, №1, s. 38-41;
Kallistratova R.F., Dergachev S.A. Podvedomstvennost korporativnykh sporov treteyskim sudam // Rossiyskoe pravosudie, 2012, №6, s. 12-21;
Strembelev S.V., Krivoy YA.V. Rassmotrenie korporativnykh sporov treteyskimi sudami: byt ili ne byt // Zakon, 2013, №4, s. 108-118;
YArkov V.V. Pravila podvedomstvennosti v novom APK RF //Arbitrazhnaya praktika. 2003. №1. S. 54.

jurisdiction, arbitration courts, the competence of arbitration courts, the jurisdiction of corporate disputes.