Anti-suit injunctions: Russian court practice approaches
( Pp. 62-65)
More about authors
Sitkareva Elena V.
kandidat yuridicheskih nauk, docent, docent kafedry grazhdanskogo prava i processa i mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava
RUDN University Law Institute
RUDN University Law Institute
Abstract:
The article based on the analysis of specific judicial acts of Russian commercial courts are considered legal grounds, subjects, purpose, and legal effects of imposing by the Russian courts anti-suit injunctions and analyzes the possibility of execution in Russia anti-suit injunctions imposed by foreign courts. Author identifies similarities and differences in the approaches of the courts of foreign countries and Russia, main gaps in the legal regulation and judicial practice, indicates the mechanism to overcome them.
How to Cite:
Sitkareva E.V., (2016), ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTIONS: RUSSIAN COURT PRACTICE APPROACHES. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 62-65.
Reference list:
Artem eva YU.A. Al ternativnoe razreshenie sporov // V mire prava. 2011. №1, S. 28-34
Eliseev N.G. Protsessual nyy dogovor. M.: Statut, 2015.
Ermakova E.P., Sitkareva E.V. Unifikatsiya norm o primenimom prave v Evropeyskom Soyuze // Sovremennoe pravo. 2014. №12. S. 130-134
Ivanovskaya N.V. Okazanie uslug po al ternativnomu razresheniyu sporov obshchestvennymi organizatsiyami v zarubezhnykh stranakh // CHernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2013. №2. S.131-133
Neznamov A.V. K prodolzheniyu diskussii o zapretakh na uchastie v sudoproizvodstve (anti-suit injunction) // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. 2015. № 9. S. 13 - 18
Piskunov YA. quot;Vyigryshnost angliyskoy yurisdiktsii v tom, chto sudy razumno podkhodyat k tolkovaniyu dogovora i vsegda starayutsya zashchitit ego deystvitel nost quot; Interv yu s R.M. KHodykinym // Zakon. 2016. №1. S. 6 - 20
Rozhkova M. Obespechitel nye mery inostrannogo suda // quot;EZH-YUrist quot;, 2006, № 30. (SPS Konsul tantPlyus)
Sitkareva E.V. Antiiskovye obespechitel nye mery v zashchitu arbitrazhnoy ogovorki: podkhody evropeyskogo prava // Sravnitel noe pravo i problemy chastnopravovogo regulirovaniya v Rossii i zarubezhnykh stranakh: sbornik statey Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii pamyati d.yu.n. professora V.K.Puchinskogo. 17 oktyabrya 2015g. M.RUDN, 2015. S.99-104
Frolova E.E. K voprosu pravovogo obespecheniya formirovaniya grazhdanskogo obshchestva // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya YUridicheskie nauki. №1. S.36-40
KHodykin R.M. Antiiskovye obespechitel nye mery v tsivilisticheskom protsesse i mezhdunarodnom arbitrazhe. // quot;Voprosy mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo, sravnitel nogo i grazhdanskogo prava, mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha: LIBER AMICORUM v chest A.A. Kostina, O.N. Zimenkovoy, N.G. Eliseeva quot; (sost. i nauch. red. S.N. Lebedev, E.V. Kabatova, A.I. Muranov, E.V. Vershinina). quot;Statut quot;, 2013 (SPS Konsul tanPlyus).
KHomich M.S. Sudebnye prikazy, vynosimye gosudarstvennymi sudami s tsel yu soblyudeniya storonami arbitrazhnogo soglasheniya // Vestnik mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha. 2013. № 1. S. 93 - 113 (SPS Konsul tanPlyus)
YArkov V.V. Primenenie antiiskovykh obespechitel nykh mer rossiyskimi sudami: pochemu by i net // Zakon. 2014. № 8. S. 84 - 92 (SPS Konsul tanPlyus)
Informatsionnoe pis mo Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 9 iyulya 2013 g. N 158 quot;Obzor praktiki rassmotreniya arbitrazhnymi sudami del s uchastiem inostrannykh lits quot;(SPS Konsul tanPlyus)
Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 09.01.2003 N A56-30789/02 (SPS Konsul tanPlyus)
Sudebnye akty po delam № A53-23688/2015, Delo № A03-547/2016. Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh sudov http://kad.arbitr.ru/
Eliseev N.G. Protsessual nyy dogovor. M.: Statut, 2015.
Ermakova E.P., Sitkareva E.V. Unifikatsiya norm o primenimom prave v Evropeyskom Soyuze // Sovremennoe pravo. 2014. №12. S. 130-134
Ivanovskaya N.V. Okazanie uslug po al ternativnomu razresheniyu sporov obshchestvennymi organizatsiyami v zarubezhnykh stranakh // CHernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2013. №2. S.131-133
Neznamov A.V. K prodolzheniyu diskussii o zapretakh na uchastie v sudoproizvodstve (anti-suit injunction) // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. 2015. № 9. S. 13 - 18
Piskunov YA. quot;Vyigryshnost angliyskoy yurisdiktsii v tom, chto sudy razumno podkhodyat k tolkovaniyu dogovora i vsegda starayutsya zashchitit ego deystvitel nost quot; Interv yu s R.M. KHodykinym // Zakon. 2016. №1. S. 6 - 20
Rozhkova M. Obespechitel nye mery inostrannogo suda // quot;EZH-YUrist quot;, 2006, № 30. (SPS Konsul tantPlyus)
Sitkareva E.V. Antiiskovye obespechitel nye mery v zashchitu arbitrazhnoy ogovorki: podkhody evropeyskogo prava // Sravnitel noe pravo i problemy chastnopravovogo regulirovaniya v Rossii i zarubezhnykh stranakh: sbornik statey Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii pamyati d.yu.n. professora V.K.Puchinskogo. 17 oktyabrya 2015g. M.RUDN, 2015. S.99-104
Frolova E.E. K voprosu pravovogo obespecheniya formirovaniya grazhdanskogo obshchestva // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya YUridicheskie nauki. №1. S.36-40
KHodykin R.M. Antiiskovye obespechitel nye mery v tsivilisticheskom protsesse i mezhdunarodnom arbitrazhe. // quot;Voprosy mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo, sravnitel nogo i grazhdanskogo prava, mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha: LIBER AMICORUM v chest A.A. Kostina, O.N. Zimenkovoy, N.G. Eliseeva quot; (sost. i nauch. red. S.N. Lebedev, E.V. Kabatova, A.I. Muranov, E.V. Vershinina). quot;Statut quot;, 2013 (SPS Konsul tanPlyus).
KHomich M.S. Sudebnye prikazy, vynosimye gosudarstvennymi sudami s tsel yu soblyudeniya storonami arbitrazhnogo soglasheniya // Vestnik mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha. 2013. № 1. S. 93 - 113 (SPS Konsul tanPlyus)
YArkov V.V. Primenenie antiiskovykh obespechitel nykh mer rossiyskimi sudami: pochemu by i net // Zakon. 2014. № 8. S. 84 - 92 (SPS Konsul tanPlyus)
Informatsionnoe pis mo Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 9 iyulya 2013 g. N 158 quot;Obzor praktiki rassmotreniya arbitrazhnymi sudami del s uchastiem inostrannykh lits quot;(SPS Konsul tanPlyus)
Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 09.01.2003 N A56-30789/02 (SPS Konsul tanPlyus)
Sudebnye akty po delam № A53-23688/2015, Delo № A03-547/2016. Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh sudov http://kad.arbitr.ru/
Keywords:
Antioquia interim measures, procedural ban, the arbitral Tribunal, the arbitration agreement.
