DISCRETION IN PROBATION: LIMITS AND FURTHER IMPROVEMENTS
( Pp. 21-27)

Task - discretion in enforcement activities, is of great theoretical and practical importance, and determines the relevance of the study. Objectives of the study are to develop a comprehensive theoretical problems of discretion in the implementation of the probation and to develop on this basis recommendations that may have importance for the further improvement of criminal legislation and enforcement activities. Model - methodological basis of the work presented a holistic set of principles and methods of scientific analysis inherent in modern criminal law theory. Conclusions - the estimation of the grounds and limits of judicial discretion in the probation Institute, proposals to clarify the limits of the evaluation activities, and when the negative sources of judicial discretion - workarounds. Practical implications - worded provisions and conclusions can be used in further elaboration of how this and related problems, the results of the study can improve the legislative technique of the criminal law, and, as a consequence, to stabilize and unify the practice of its application.

Gracheva J.V., (2016), DISCRETION IN PROBATION: LIMITS AND FURTHER IMPROVEMENTS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 21-27.

Anashkin G.Z. Obstoyatel stva, smyagchayushchie i otyagchayushchie otvetstvennost // Sov. yustitsiya. 1980. № 16.
Burkanov YU.A. YUridicheskaya priroda i vozmozhnosti rasshireniya primeneniya instituta uslovnogo osuzhdeniya // Regional nye problemy bor by s prestupnost yu. M., 1998. S. 55.
Valeev A.KH. Uslovnoe osuzhdenie nesovershennoletnikh: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Ufa, 2004.
Vinogradov A.B. Uslovnoe osuzhdenie: zakonodatel nyy, teoreticheskiy i pravoprimenitel nyy aspekty: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Krasnodar, 2001.
Zel dov S.I. Aktual nye problemy sovershenstvovaniya form realizatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti. Ordzhonikidze, 1990.
Kadari KH. Uslovnoe osuzhdenie po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu // Sov. gosudarstvo i pravo. 1956. № 1.
Kazaryan E.A. Uslovnye vidy osvobozhdeniya ot nakazaniya (ponyatie, vidy, kharakteristika) / otv. red. L.V. Inogamova-KHegay. Vladimir, 2007.
Karpets I.I. Individualizatsiya nakazaniya v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. M., 1961. Tkachevskiy YU.M. Osvobozhdenie ot otbyvaniya nakazaniya. M., 1970.
Klimov N., Savin N. Uslovnoe osuzhdenie // Sots. zakonnost . 1961. № 8.
Kondalov A.N. Uslovnoe osuzhdenie i mekhanizm ego obespecheniya: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Kazan , 2000.
Kriger G.A. Uslovnoe osuzhdenie i rol obshchestvennosti v ego primenenii. M., 1963.
Kruglikov L.L. Smyagchayushchie i otyagchayushchie otvetstvennost obstoyatel stva v ugolovnom prave (voprosy teorii). Voronezh, 1985.
Lomako V.A. Primenenie uslovnogo osuzhdeniya. KHar kov, 1976. S. 22.
Pavlov D.A. Uslovnoe osuzhdenie nesovershennoletnikh v zakonodatel stve Rossii i gosudarstv - uchastnikov SNG (zakonodatel noe regulirovanie i organizatsiya realizatsii) / otv. red. A.I. CHuchaev. Vladimir, 2006.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR ot 4 marta 1961 g. № 1 (v red. ot 26 aprelya 1984 g.) O sudebnoy praktike po primeneniyu uslovnogo osuzhdeniya // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR. 1961. № 3.
Pronnikov V.V. Uslovnoe osuzhdenie i ego pravovye posledstviya: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Omsk, 2002. S. 124.
Ragimov R.A. Problemy naznacheniya nakazaniya (po materialam Respubliki Dagestan): dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Makhachkala, 2002.
Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo: V 2 t. / pod red. A.I. Raroga. T. 1: Obshchaya chast . M., 2003.
Sakharov A.B. Planirovanie ugolovnoy politiki i perspektivy razvitiya ugolovnogo zakonodatel stva // Planirovanie mer bor by s prestupnost yu. M., 1982.
Solov ev A.D. Voprosy primeneniya nakazaniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. M., 1958.
Stanovskiy A.M. Nekotorye voprosy, voznikayushchie pri primenenii uslovnogo osuzhdeniya // Ugolovno-ispolnitel naya sistema: pravo, ekonomika, upravlenie. 2010. № 2.
Tadevosyan Z.A. SHtraf kak mera nakazaniya. Erevan, 1978.
Tkachevskiy YU.M. Osvobozhdenie ot otbyvaniya nakazaniya. M., 1970.
Utkin V.A. Nakazanie i ispravitel no-trudovoe vozdeystvie. Tomsk, 1984.
SHaripov T.SH. Institut uslovnogo neprimeneniya nakazaniya v ugolovnom prave: problemy teorii, zakonodatel stva i praktiki. M., 2008.
SHnitenkov A. Ogranichit sudeyskoe usmotrenie pri primenenii uslovnogo osuzhdeniya // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2002. № 4.

discretion, limits, probation, exemption from punishment.