Legal form and content of the pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case: Vision for the Future
( Pp. 186-190)

The aim of the study is to develop proposals for reform of the preliminary investigation. The investigative form of the preliminary investigation does not correspond to the adversarial procedure of the trial. This reduces the efficiency of the criminal process and undermines the credibility of his justice. The solution of the problem of reforming the preliminary investigation is complicated by the fact that there are different reform options. Some of them, according to the author, are erroneous, so there is an urgent need for criticism and the demonstration of the science of insolvency. The objective of the study was the criticism of the project of creation of a single investigative body and independent investigative authorities. In addition, solved the problem of refutation of the doctrine of judicial investigator as the leading subject of the preliminary investigation. The main aim of the study was the substantiation of the concept of a police inquiry as the basic model of the legal organization of pre-trial proceedings. The basis of the author's position is based on the model of the police inquiry carried out by the criminal police bodies under the leadership of the Prosecutor and with the participation of the investigating judge. This model was developed by the Nizhny Novgorod school of processualists and set forth in the "Doctrinal model of the law of evidence in the Russian Federation and connected with the reform plan of the law enforcement system of Russia developed by experts of Committee of civil initiatives Alexei Kudrin. It corresponds to the European standards of the legal organization of pre-trial proceedings in criminal cases. The author develops the basic concepts of the doctrine concerning pre-trial criminal prosecution, pre-trial criminal investigation, pre-trial and pre-trial evidence. According to the author, the basis of the legal organization of a pretrial investigation should be based on the idea of differentiation, pre-trial and trial evidence. Different in their legal implications have to admit the results of the unilateral activity of subjects of criminal prosecution and the outcome of bilateral legal evidence. The author analyzes the various options for possible reform of the preliminary investigation. He comes to the conclusion that when investigating the organization of pre-trial criminal justice inevitably will degrade and break away from solving the urgent task of countering the hidden, most dangerous criminal threats to economic and national security of Russia. In the current system of criminal procedure, the adoption of procedural decisions of the investigator determines the involvement of the court of the person criminally liable. The author explains the necessity of transition to the new legal organization of pre-trial proceedings by type of police investigations under the procedural guidance of the Prosecutor. Pre-trial mandatory participation of the investigating judge. The Prosecutor and the judicial police shall carry out inquest in the form of overt and covert investigative actions to detect and solve the crime and identify the criminal. The prosecution should be the Prosecutor in court on the basis of actual materials obtained by the criminal police in the course of the inquiry. The author has developed the basic parameters should model the preliminary investigation. He outlined a system of consistent views on the proper order of detection and disclosure of crimes of criminal police. They represented the essence of the evidentiary activity of subjects of pretrial criminal proceedings. Plaintiffs submitted a model indictment. Collectively authoring make an important contribution to the theory of the organization of the prosecutorial and pre-trial legal procedure for its work. This creates the ideological and theoretical background for the structural reforms of the criminal proceedings.

Jamiev M.R., (2016), LEGAL FORM AND CONTENT OF THE PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS IN A CRIMINAL CASE: VISION FOR THE FUTURE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 186-190.

Aleksandrov A.S. Institut sledstvennoy vlasti v Rossii: kratkaya istoriya vozniknoveniya, razvitiya i degeneratsii // Vestnik nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii, 2016. № 2(34). S. 331-337.
Aleksandrov A.S. Kakim ne byt predvaritel nomu sledstviyu // Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2001. № 9. S. 54-62.
Aleksandrov A.S. Ponyatie i sushchnost ugolovnogo iska // Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2006. № 2. S. 38-44.
Aleksandrov A.S., Pozdnyakov M.L. Put institutsional noy reformy predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya // Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD RF, 2014. № 1(25). S. 78-82.
Bagmet A.M. Analiz tselesoobraznosti vvedeniya instituta sledstvennogo sud i v ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo // Rossiyskiy sledovatel , 2015. № 11. S. 6-8.
Bagmet A.M. K voprosu o protsessual noy samostoyatel nosti sledovatelya na stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Ugolovnyy protsess: ot proshlogo k budushchemu: materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (Moskva, 21 marta 2014 goda). V 2-kh chastyakh. CHast 1. M.: Akademiya Sledstvennogo komiteta Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2014. S. 12-17.
Baev O.YA. Mesto sledovatelya i prokurora v sisteme dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // Sovremennaya kriminalistika: problemy, tendentsii, perspektivy: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 90-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Zasluzhennogo deyatelya nauki RF, Zasluzhennogo yurista RSFSR, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora Nikolaya Pavlovicha YAblokova. Moskva, 22 dekabrya 2015 g. / Red.-sost. M.A. Lushechkina. M.: MAKS Press, 2015. S. 126-130.
Vereshchagina A.V. Nuzhna li reforma predvaritel nogo sledstviya // Pravovedenie, 2005. № 1. S. 160-168.
Vlasova S.V. Apologiya novoy teorii ugolovno-protsessual nykh dokazatel stv // YUridicheskaya nauka i praktika. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii, 2016. № 1(33). S. 99-104.
Vlasova S.V. KHmel nitskaya T.V. O doktrinal noy modeli formirovaniya ugolovno-protsessual nykh dokazatel stv v sostyazatel nom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Obshchestvo i pravo, 2016. № 1 (55). S. 137-142.
Golovko L.V. Reforma politsii v kontekste modernizatsii predvaritel nogo proizvodstva v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse // Ugolovnaya yustitsiya: svyaz vremen. Izbrannye materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. Sankt-Peterburg, 6-8 oktyabrya 2010 goda / sost. A.V. Smirnov, K.B. Kalinovskiy. M.: ZAO Aktion-Media , 2012. S. 24-31.
Derishev YU.V. Dosudebnoe ugolovnoe presledovanie po UPK RF // Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2004. № 12. S. 43-50.
Doktrinal naya model ugolovno-protsessual -nogo dokazatel stvennogo prava RF i Kommentarii k ney / A.S. Aleksandrov, I.A. Aleksandrova i dr. M.: YUrlitinform, 2015. 304 s.
Zakonoproekt № 440058-6 O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s vvedeniem instituta ustanovleniya ob ektivnoy istiny po ugolovnomu delu Elektronnyy resurs - URL: http: //asozd2.duma.gov.ru/main. nsf/(Spravka) OpenAgent RN 440058-6 02
Nikonov M.A. Primenenie mery presecheniya v vide zaklyucheniya pod strazhu: pravovye pozitsii ESPCH i KS RF // Ugolovnyy protsess, 2014. № 4. S. 50-61.
Novikova A. Praktiki surrogatnykh opravdatel nykh prigovorov, 14 fevralya 2013 Elektronnyy resurs - URL: http://polit.ru/article/2013/02/14/court/ (data obrashcheniya 18.03.2016).
Piyuk A.V. Pravovoe polozhenie sledovatelya v sovremennom ugolovnom protsesse // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya, 2011. № 3. S. 33-37.
Razogreeva A.M. Povorot k luchshemu : praktiki perekvalifikatsii pri rassmotrenii ugolovnykh del sudami Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Obvinenie i opravdanie v postsovetskoy ugolovnoy yustitsii. M.: Norma, 2015. S. 199-230.
Reshetnikov V. Sledovateli ne dolzhny obvinyat // Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost , 1988. № 6. S. 53-56.
Smirnov A.V. O deformalizatsii ugolovnogo presledovaniya na dosudebnoy podgotovke dela // Konstitutsionno-pravovye problemy operativno-rozysknoy deyatel nosti. Sbornik materialov vserossiyskogo kruglogo stola: Sankt-Peterburg, 3 noyabrya 2011 g. / Sost. K.B. Kalinovskiy. SPb: Severo-Zapadnyy filial Rossiyskoy akademii pravosudiya, 2012. S. 211-216.
Titaev K., SHklyaruk M. Rossiyskiy sledovatel : prizvanie, professiya, povsednevnost . M., 2016. 28 s.
TSvetkov YU.A. Apparat vlasti sledstvennoy / pod obshchey red. N.A. Kolokolova. M.: YUrlitinform, 2016. 384 s.
TSvetkov YU.A. Suverennaya natsional naya model sledstvennoy vlasti: mif ili real nost URL: http://www.iuaj.net/node/1936
SHeyfer S.A. Kuda dvizhetsya rossiyskoe sudoproizvodstvo (razmyshleniya po povodu vektorov razvitiya ugolovno-protsessual nogo zakonodatel stva) // Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2007. № 1. 28-37.
Eksklyuzivnoe interv yu s glavoy MVD Vladimirom Kolokol tsevym ot 26 noyabrya 2015 goda Elektronnyy resurs - URL: http://www.ntv.ru/novosti/ 1577741
http://www.enforce.spb.ru/images/Issledovanya/IRL KGI Reform final 11.13..

a preliminary investigation, the criminal police, criminal prosecution, inquiry.