RULES OF CONSTRUCTION QUALIFYING AND PREFERRED ELEMENTS OF THE CRIME
( Pp. 172-178)

More about authors
Rogova Evgeniya Viktorovna PhD at Law, Associate Professor, The doctoral candidate at criminal policy and the organisation of the prevention of crimes chair. Place of study: Academy of management of MIA Russia
For read the full article, please, register or log in
Abstract:
The paper proposes solution to some problems related to the legislative embodiment and application of aggravating and privileged elements of the crime , which is one of the means of differentiation of criminal responsibility. The main criteria for their selection. Inconsistency circumstances one of the main criteria for evidence of the impossibility of its legislative regulation . The author also reviews the rules of qualified design and preferred types of crimes with their division into those that relate to the content and those that relate to the form. When securing the qualifying and preferred features necessary to minimize the signs of estimates , the vague wording of terminological inconsistency. It is suitable for the presentation of aggravating circumstances «cluster» principle. In the General Part of the Criminal Code should establish a chapter on legislative interpretation of the most difficult to understand the law- qualifying and preferred features.
How to Cite:
Rogova E.V., (2013), RULES OF CONSTRUCTION QUALIFYING AND PREFERRED ELEMENTS OF THE CRIME. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5: 172-178.
Reference list:
O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i otdel nye zakonodatel nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Federal nyy zakon RF ot 7 dekabrya 2011 g. № 420-FZ // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 9 dekabrya 2011. № 5654.
Vasil evskiy A.V. YUridicheskaya tekhnika zakrepleniya v ugolovnom zakone differentsiruyushchikh ugolovnuyu otvetstvennost obstoyatel stv // Normotvorcheskaya i pravoprimenitel naya tekhnika v ugolovnom i ugolovno-protsessual nom prave. Sb. nauch. statey. YAroslavl : Izd-vo YArosl. un-ta, 2000. S. 99-107.
Volzhenkin B.V. O differentsiatsii otvetstvennosti za korruptsionnye pravonarusheniya (Iz opyta razrabotki proekta Zakona o bor be s korruptsiey) // Differentsiatsiya otvetstvennosti v ugolovnom prave i protsesse. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov - YAroslavl : Izd-vo YArosl. un-ta, 1994. S. 160-168.
Golovnenkov P.V. Ugolovnoe ulozhenie (Ugolovnyy kodeks) Federativnoy Respubliki Germaniya: nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy i perevod teksta zakona. 2-e izd., pereab. I dop. M.: Prospekt, 2013. 312 s.
Gribov A.S. Differentsiatsiya otvetstvennosti za ekonomicheskie prestupleniya v Rossii, FRG i SSHA: sravnitel no-pravovoe issledovanie: Avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. - YAroslavl , 2011. 26 s.
Kobzeva E.V. Teoriya otsenochnykh priznakov v ugolovnom zakone / Nauch. red. N.A. Lopashenko. M.: YUrlitinform, 2009. 264 s.
Kostareva T.A. Kvalifitsiruyushchie obstoyatel stva v ugolovnom prave: ponyatie, zakonodatel naya reglamentatsiya, vliyanie na differentsiatsiyu otvetstvennosti/ T.A.Kostareva. YAroslavl : Izd-vo YAGU, 1993. 234 s.
Kruglikov L.L. O konstruirovanii kvalifitsirovannykh sostavov prestupleniy // Pravovedenie. - 1989. - № 2. S. 43-49.
Kruglikov L.L., Vasil evskiy A.V. Differentsiatsiya otvetstvennosti v ugolovnom prave. SPb.: YUrid. tsentr Press, 2002. 300 s.
Kruglikov L.L., Smirnova L.E. Unifikatsiya v ugolovnom prave. SPb.: Izd-vo R. Aslanova YUridicheskiy tsentr Press , 2008. 285 s.
Kruglikov L.L., Solov ev O.G. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel nosti i nalogooblozheniya: (Voprosy konstruirovaniya sostavov i differentsiatsii otvetstvennosti) / Pod obshch. red. L.L. Kruglikova. YAroslavl .: Izd-vo YArosl. gos. un-ta, 2003. 224 s.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Obshchaya teoriya kvalifikatsii prestupleniy. M.: YUrid. lit., 1972. 352 s.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Ob ektivnaya storona prestupleniya. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1960. 244 s.
Lesnievski-Kostareva T.A. Differentsiatsiya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: Teoriya i zakonodatel naya praktika. M: Izdatel stvo NORMA, 1998. 296 s.
Lopashenko N.A. Eshche raz ob otsenochnykh kategoriyakh v zakonodatel nykh formulirovkakh prestupleniy v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel nosti // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2002. - № 2. S.42-45.
Lopashenko N.A. Nedostatki zakonodatel noy tekhniki ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossii kak prepyatstvie dlya ego effektivnogo primeneniya i kriminogennyy faktor // Mezhdunarodnoe i natsional noe ugolovnoe zakonodatel stvo: problemy yuridicheskoy tekhniki. Materialy III Mezhdunar. nauch.-praktich. konf., sostoyavsheysya na yurid. fak. MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova 29-30 maya 2003 g. - M., 2004. S. 38-49.
Maksimov S.V. UK na pereput e. Stoit li forsirovat rabotu nad novym kodeksom. Elektronnyy resurs .- Rezhim dostupa: http://www.rg.ru/2011/06/07/ uk.html (data obrashcheniya 21.09.13)
Pobegaylo E.F. Problemy differentsiatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za tyazhkie nasil stvennye prestupleniya // Sovershenstvovanie pravovykh mer bor by s prestupnost yu. Vladivostok: Izd-vo DVGU, 1986. S. 24-30.
Svinkin A.I. Optimal noe konstruirovanie kvalifitsirovannykh sostavov po priznakam povtornosti i retsidiva // Problemy effektivnosti ugolovnogo zakona. Sverdlovsk: Sverd. yurid. in-t, 1975. S. 35-37.
Svinkin A.I. Priznaki lichnosti prestupnika v roli kvalifitsiruyushchikh obstoyatel stv // Problemy sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava i kriminologii. - Sverdlovsk: Sverd. yurid. in-t, 1973. S. 60-62.
Filimonov V.D. Kriminologicheskie osnovy ugolovnogo prava. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomsk. un-ta, 1981. 214 s.
Rogova E.V. Predposylki formirovaniya ucheniya o differentsiatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti v teorii ugolovnogo prava na sovremennom etape // Biznes v zakone. Mezhdunarodnyy ekonomiko-yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2012. №3. S.105-108.
Keywords:
differentiation of the criminal liability, qualifying features, privilegiada signs, the offense.