Some problematic aspects of the conclusion aspects of the conclusion of the pre-trial agreement on cooperation
( Pp. 180-185)

Objective: The purpose of a scientific article is that on the basis of comprehensive analysis of existing legislation to investigate a number of issues the institute pre-trial agreement on cooperation, to develop and justify proposals to improve it. These goals led to the formulation and approval of the following tasks: To find out the socio-legal and criminal procedure appointment mechanism of pre-trial agreement on cooperation; Formulate and justify proposals for ensuring procedural safeguards who has concluded a cooperation agreement; Formulate and justify specific provisions for the improvement of criminal procedural law in the implementation of the institute pre-trial agreement on cooperation. Method: The general scientific dialectical method of knowledge allows us to consider this phenomenon in its development, in all relationships with other procedural and criminal law institutions, as well as the general scientific methods: structural and functional, historical, formal - logical methods (analysis, synthesis, concretization, analogy, modeling), statistical, comparative, sociological (including questionnaires and interviews). Conclusions: Criminal Procedure Law does not bind the possibility of concluding the pre-trial agreement on cooperation with the procedural status of the person. It seems appropriate to conclude pre-trial agreement before criminal proceedings with a person having criminal relevant information and willing to assist in solving crimes, wants to have appropriate safeguards for the occurrence of the positive consequences of the law, but does not have such a status. The reason for the institution of criminal proceedings is the decision on the conclusion of the pre-trial agreement on cooperation and the direction of the respective materials in the preliminary investigation body to address the issue of a criminal case. Scope of the study: the analysis of chapter 40.1 of the RF Code of Criminal Procedure; formed and settle concrete proposals to improve the legislation on criminal procedure in the implementation of the institute pre-trial agreement on cooperation. Practical value: the conclusions and recommendations contained in the article can be used in the further improvement of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation; in research work on this issue.

Edilova P.V., (2016), SOME PROBLEMATIC ASPECTS OF THE CONCLUSION ASPECTS OF THE CONCLUSION OF THE PRE-TRIAL AGREEMENT ON COOPERATION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 180-185.

Abshilava G.V. Deyatel noe raskayanie i yavka s povinnoy, realizuemye v forme dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve// Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2015. №4. S. 258-261;
Afanas ev S. Preyuditsiya, ili Protsessual nyy kapkan// Novaya advokatskaya gazeta. 2010. №7(072);
Bertovskiy L. V., Edilova P.V. Problemy razvitiya instituta dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve// CHernye dyry v Rossiyskom Zakonodatel stve. 2015. №3. S. 120-124;
Kirsanov A.YU. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve. Analiz, praktika, vyvody // izd-vo YUNITI-DANA: Zakon i pravo , 2014. S. 128;
Kachalova O.V. Poryadok peresmotra vstupivshikh v zakonnuyu silu prigovorov, vynesennykh v otnoshenii lits, zaklyuchivshikh dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve// Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2015. №5. S. 147-151;
Pastukhov V.S. Osobennosti dokazyvaniya po ugolovnomu delu, po kotoromu zaklyucheno dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve// Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2015. №4. S. 246-248;
Peshkov A.M. Sdelka o priznanii viny v ugolovnom protsesse SSHA i ee vliyanie na naznachenie nakazaniya// Pod. red. prof. B.S. Volkova i prof. I.D. Kozochkina: Materialy mezhvuzovskoy nauchnoy konferentsii, sostoyavsheysya v Rossiyskom universitete druzhby narodov v marte 1998 g. ;
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 28.06.2012 №16 O praktike primeneniya sudami osobogo poryadka sudebnogo razbiratel stva ugolovnykh del pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // elektronnyy resurs http://www.con-sultant.ru/document/cons doc LAW 131884;
Tertyshnaya O.A. Ugolovno-protsessual nyy mekhanizm dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.09// Tertyshnaya Oksana Aleksandrovna. - Voronezh, 2014. S. 206;
Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks RF ot 18.12.2001 p. 174-FZ// Prinyat GD RF ot 29.12.2010 (s izm. i dop., vstupivshimi v silu s 15.01.2011) Elektronnyy resurs SPS Konsul tantPlyus. Data obrashcheniya k resursu 20.03.2016;
Edilova P.V. Problemy poiska istiny v ugolovnom protsesse i dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve// Vestnik rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov: seriya yuridicheskie nauki, №4, 2014 g. S. 238-252;
Edilova P.V. Zaklyuchenie dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve s nesovershennoletnimi// Istoricheskie, filosofskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, №5(55), 2015 g. (chast 2). S. 215-217;
Edilova P.V. Prava obvinyaemogo (podozrevaemogo) pri zaklyuchenii soglasheniya s obvineniem// Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii Den yurista , 2014 g.S. 171-178;

pre-trial agreement on cooperation, procedural status, the accused, contractors, the rights and obligations of contractante.