ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDICE IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERDISCIPLINARY CONNECTIONS
( Pp. 28-33)

The Institute of administrative prejudice in terms of its compliance with the principles of criminal law and tendencies of development of modern jurisprudence. Stating the purpose of the article a comprehensive assessment of the crimes with components of administrative prejudice, the author addresses theoretical and practical problems: characterizes its legal and technical models, studying the timing of bringing to administrative responsibility, evaluates criminological, legal and political feasibility of the introduction of the institution in the criminal Code, qualification of crimes with administrative prejudice, searches for differences between the administrative and the criminal sense of the term "repeatedly" and "repetition" of crime. The paper presents the author's model of analysis of compounds with administrative prejudice to the position of assessing the quality and completeness of the implementation of these basic functional characteristics of the institution, namely the provision of a "soft" transition from administrative to criminal liability, the fullest possible account of the social danger of re-offending and the coherence of the provisions of the Administrative Code and the Criminal Code. The proposed model has allowed to formulate a number of theoretically and practically meaningful conclusions about the prospects of application of administrative prejudice. In particular, on the basis of generalization of judicial practice the author defines the period during which a person may be for the commission of a second offense in the criminal liability, and correlate their findings with the provisions of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation, considers the term "repetition" through the concept of legal repeatedly distinguish between multiple and the continued single crime. The scope of this study are determined by the object of study and limited social relations arising in the framework of criminal liability for repeated offense. Appeal to the insufficiently developed in the criminal problem of the theory of law has allowed to offer a number of important practical recommendations on application of administrative prejudice. Of particular interest for the investigative and judicial practice may be the author's approach to determining the timing offset an administrative penalty in the case of revision, and (or) appeal against the decision in the case, the legal assessment of the repeated algorithm differentiation unit (continue) the multiplicity of offenses and acts. On the originality of the work suggests an unconventional approach to the assessment of interdisciplinary connections of criminal and administrative law, as well as the validity and originality of the conclusions formulated.

Sidorenko E.L., (2016), ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDICE IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERDISCIPLINARY CONNECTIONS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 28-33.

Bavsun M.V., Bavsun I.G., Tikhon I.A. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya i perspektivy ee primeneniya na sovremennom etape // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2008. № 6. S. 6 - 9.
Goloviznina I.A. Problema dvusmyslennosti termina neodnokratnost , soderzhashchegosya v st. 180 UK RF, i puti ee preodoleniya // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2006. № 11. S. 15 - 17.
Zuev V.L. Osobennosti dokazyvaniya po delam o prestupleniyakh s administrativnoy preyuditsiey. M., 1995.
Kontseptsiya razvitiya rossiyskogo zakonodatel stva / Otv. red. T.YA. KHabrieva, YU.A. Tikhomirov. M.: IZiSP pri Pravitel stve RF, ID YUrisprudentsiya , 2014.
Lapina M.A. Optimal nye priemy yuridicheskoy tekhniki, obespechivayushchie soglasovanie sistemy yuridicheskikh sanktsiy administrativno - deliktnogo i ugolovnogo zakonodatel stva // Administrativnoe i munitsipal noe pravo. 2015. № 6. S. 575 - 581.
Sidorenko E.L. O statuse poterpevshego v ugolovnom prave // ZHurnal Rossiyskogo prava. 2011. S. 77 - 84.
Ustinova T.D. Rasshirenie ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za nezakonnoe predprinimatel stvo // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2-3. № 5. S. 103 - 105.
SHemyakin D.V. Problemnye voprosy ispol zovaniya administrativnoy preyuditsii v ugolovnom prave // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2015. № 15. S. 45 - 47.

administrative prejudice, decision on case about administrative violation, the Protocol on administrative offense, criminal liability, crime, repeated, the repetition.