Basic models of pre-contractual responsibility: comparative legal analysis
( Pp. 211-214)
More about authors
Kutashevskaia Iana Sergeevna
vypusknica
VSU named after M.V.Lomonosov
VSU named after M.V.Lomonosov
Abstract:
The article examines the problems the nature of pre-contractual liability in the framework of comparative legal methodology. The legislation and judicial practice of Germany, France, the USA and Russia are studied. The author attempts to determine what rules should be applied to «culpa in contrahendo» in the Russian legal order: contractual or tort law.
How to Cite:
Kutashevskaia I.S., (2018), BASIC MODELS OF PRE-CONTRACTUAL RESPONSIBILITY: COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 3 => 211-214.
Reference list:
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 N 51-FZ // SPS Konsul tant Plyus
Postanovlenie VTSIK ot 11.11.1922 quot;O vvedenii v deystvie Grazhdanskogo kodeksa R.S.F.S.R. quot; (vmeste s quot;Grazhdanskim kodeksom R.S.F.S.R. quot;) // SPS Konsul tant Plyus
Restatement (Second) of Contracts (1981).
Grazhdanskoe ulozhenie Germanii (GGU) ot 18.08.1896 // SPS Konsul tant Plyus
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Frantsii (Kodeks Napoleona) ot 21.03.1804 // SPS Konsul tant Plyus
Postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24.03.2016 N 7 quot;O primenenii sudami nekotorykh polozheniy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob otvetstvennosti za narushenie obyazatel stv quot;
Walford vs Miles. 1992 2 AC 128, 1992 1 A11 ER 453, 1992 2 WLR 174 (HL 1992)
BGH, 20.06.1952 - V ZR 34/51, BGHZ 6, 330. Perevod na angliyskiy yazyk, URL: https://law.utexas.edu/transnational/foreign-law-translations/german/case.php id 879 (data obrashcheniya: 19.04.18)
Agarkov M.M. K voprosu o dogovornoy otvetstvennosti // Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu: V 2 t. M., 2002. T.2.
Beklenishcheva I.V. Grazhdansko-pravovoy dogovor: klassicheskaya traditsiya i sovremennye tendentsii. - M., 2006.
Girshbandt A. Problema preddogovornoy otvetstvennosti v noveyshey tsivilistike. Pravo. Ezhenedel naya yuridicheskaya gazeta , 1912, № 43. // URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2013/6/1/g fadzhella i r salejl v izlozhenii a girshbandta preddogovornaya otvetstvennost (data obrashcheniya: 18.04.2018).
Gnitsevich K.V. Doktrina culpa in contrahendo v sudebnoy praktike Germanii nachala XX veka. Stat ya 1. // URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/doktrina-culpa-in-contrahendo-v-sudebnoy-praktike-germanii-nachala-xx-veka-statya-1 (data obrashcheniya: 18.04.2018).
Gnitsevich K.V. Preddogovornaya otvetstvennost v grazhdanskom prave (culpa in contrahendo): Avtoref. dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. SPbGU, 2009.
Krivtsov A.S. Obshchee uchenie ob ubytkakh // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 2015. N 5.
Kucher A.N. Teoriya i praktika preddogovornogo etapa: yuridicheskiy aspekt. M.: Statut, 2005. S. 222.
Novitskiy I.B. Obshchee uchenie ob obyazatel stve // Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu. M., 2006. T. 2.
Pokrovskiy I.A. Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava. // Izdatel stvo Statut, Moskva, 2013.
Rabinovich N.V. Nedeystvitel nost sdelok i ee posledstviya. L., 1960.
Culpa in contrahendo, ili Vozmeshchenie ubytkov pri nedeystvitel nosti ili nezaklyuchennosti dogovorov (Iering R.) (Perevod s nemetskogo vypolnen M.B. ZHuzhzhalovym). // SPS Konsul tant Plyus
Hillman R.A. Questioning the New Consensus on Promissory Estoppel: an Empirical and Theoretical Study, 98 Colum. L. Rev 580. 1998.
Jimenez, Marco. The Many Faces of Promissory Estoppel: An Empirical Analysis under the Restatement (Second) of Contracts. UCLA Law Review, Vol. 57. Stetson University College of Law Research Paper No. 2009-14. // URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract 1373861 (data obrashcheniya 12.04.18)
Leonhard F. Verschulden beim Vertragsschlu e. Berlin, 1910.
Markesinis B., Unberath H., Johnston A. The German Law of Contract. A Comparative Treatise. - Second Edition. - Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 2006.
Robert E. Scott. Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores and the Myth of Precontractual Reliance. // URL: www.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/microsites/contract-economic-organization/files/working-papers/Hoffman 203.0 20final.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 18.04.2018)
Zimmermann R. The Law of Obligations. Cape Town, 1990.
Postanovlenie VTSIK ot 11.11.1922 quot;O vvedenii v deystvie Grazhdanskogo kodeksa R.S.F.S.R. quot; (vmeste s quot;Grazhdanskim kodeksom R.S.F.S.R. quot;) // SPS Konsul tant Plyus
Restatement (Second) of Contracts (1981).
Grazhdanskoe ulozhenie Germanii (GGU) ot 18.08.1896 // SPS Konsul tant Plyus
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Frantsii (Kodeks Napoleona) ot 21.03.1804 // SPS Konsul tant Plyus
Postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24.03.2016 N 7 quot;O primenenii sudami nekotorykh polozheniy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob otvetstvennosti za narushenie obyazatel stv quot;
Walford vs Miles. 1992 2 AC 128, 1992 1 A11 ER 453, 1992 2 WLR 174 (HL 1992)
BGH, 20.06.1952 - V ZR 34/51, BGHZ 6, 330. Perevod na angliyskiy yazyk, URL: https://law.utexas.edu/transnational/foreign-law-translations/german/case.php id 879 (data obrashcheniya: 19.04.18)
Agarkov M.M. K voprosu o dogovornoy otvetstvennosti // Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu: V 2 t. M., 2002. T.2.
Beklenishcheva I.V. Grazhdansko-pravovoy dogovor: klassicheskaya traditsiya i sovremennye tendentsii. - M., 2006.
Girshbandt A. Problema preddogovornoy otvetstvennosti v noveyshey tsivilistike. Pravo. Ezhenedel naya yuridicheskaya gazeta , 1912, № 43. // URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2013/6/1/g fadzhella i r salejl v izlozhenii a girshbandta preddogovornaya otvetstvennost (data obrashcheniya: 18.04.2018).
Gnitsevich K.V. Doktrina culpa in contrahendo v sudebnoy praktike Germanii nachala XX veka. Stat ya 1. // URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/doktrina-culpa-in-contrahendo-v-sudebnoy-praktike-germanii-nachala-xx-veka-statya-1 (data obrashcheniya: 18.04.2018).
Gnitsevich K.V. Preddogovornaya otvetstvennost v grazhdanskom prave (culpa in contrahendo): Avtoref. dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. SPbGU, 2009.
Krivtsov A.S. Obshchee uchenie ob ubytkakh // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 2015. N 5.
Kucher A.N. Teoriya i praktika preddogovornogo etapa: yuridicheskiy aspekt. M.: Statut, 2005. S. 222.
Novitskiy I.B. Obshchee uchenie ob obyazatel stve // Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu. M., 2006. T. 2.
Pokrovskiy I.A. Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava. // Izdatel stvo Statut, Moskva, 2013.
Rabinovich N.V. Nedeystvitel nost sdelok i ee posledstviya. L., 1960.
Culpa in contrahendo, ili Vozmeshchenie ubytkov pri nedeystvitel nosti ili nezaklyuchennosti dogovorov (Iering R.) (Perevod s nemetskogo vypolnen M.B. ZHuzhzhalovym). // SPS Konsul tant Plyus
Hillman R.A. Questioning the New Consensus on Promissory Estoppel: an Empirical and Theoretical Study, 98 Colum. L. Rev 580. 1998.
Jimenez, Marco. The Many Faces of Promissory Estoppel: An Empirical Analysis under the Restatement (Second) of Contracts. UCLA Law Review, Vol. 57. Stetson University College of Law Research Paper No. 2009-14. // URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract 1373861 (data obrashcheniya 12.04.18)
Leonhard F. Verschulden beim Vertragsschlu e. Berlin, 1910.
Markesinis B., Unberath H., Johnston A. The German Law of Contract. A Comparative Treatise. - Second Edition. - Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 2006.
Robert E. Scott. Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores and the Myth of Precontractual Reliance. // URL: www.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/microsites/contract-economic-organization/files/working-papers/Hoffman 203.0 20final.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 18.04.2018)
Zimmermann R. The Law of Obligations. Cape Town, 1990.
Keywords:
civil law, comparative legal analysis, pre-contractual liability, systematics obligations.
