TO THE QUESTION ABOUT THE GROUNDS FOR THE PREVENTIVE MEASURE IN THE PRODUCTION ON CRIMINAL CASES OF A TERRORIST NATURE
( Pp. 68-70)

More about authors
Gutieva Irina Genrikhovna Police Colonel, Cand.Sci.(Law), Deputy Head of the Department of State and Civil Law Disciplines of the
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Nalchik, Russia
Abstract:
Objective: the article analyses the enforcement procedures of the preventive measure in the production on criminal cases of a terrorist nature. It should be noted that the implementation of the Institute coercive measures and in particular measures of criminal procedural restraint are some of the most relevant in the criminal procedure science. Methodology: Area of study are the norms of the criminal procedural legislation, law enforcement practice, as well as scientific-practical and theoretical principles associated with the legal institution of preventive measures. Methodological basis of research is the dialectical method of scientific knowledge, as well as comparative-legal, systemic-structural, logical, historical, and other private-scientific methods of research of legal phenomena. Conclusions: the article provides the results of the offering on the basis of legal analysis, the specification of a number of provisions concerning the procedure for election of a preventive measure in criminal cases.
How to Cite:
Gutieva I.G., (2017), TO THE QUESTION ABOUT THE GROUNDS FOR THE PREVENTIVE MEASURE IN THE PRODUCTION ON CRIMINAL CASES OF A TERRORIST NATURE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 3 => 68-70.
Reference list:
1. Konstitutsiya RF 1993 g.
Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot; ot 18.12.2001 N 174-FZ (red. ot 06.07.2016) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. N 249. 22.12.2001.
Opredelenie SK VS RF ot 12.06.2006 po delu N 19-O06-36. Arkhiv VS RF, 2006.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 19.12.2013 N 41 (red. ot 24.05.2016) quot;O praktike primeneniya sudami zakonodatel stva o merakh presecheniya v vide zaklyucheniya pod strazhu, domashnego aresta i zaloga quot; // Rossiyskaya gazeta. N 294. 27.12.2013.
Barabash A.S. TSeli i osnovaniya izbraniya mery presecheniya v ugolovnom protsesse // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2015. N 12.
Davydov V.A., Doroshkov V.V., Kolokolov N.A. i dr. Praktika primeneniya Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: prakticheskoe posobie: v 2 ch.; pod red. V.M. Lebedeva. 7-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: YUrayt, 2016. CH. 1. 231 s.
Belyakova A.V., Voskobitova L.A., Gabov A.V. i dr. Problemy razvitiya protsessual nogo prava Rossii: monografiya; pod red. V.M. ZHuykova. M.: Norma, Infra-M, 2016. 224 s;
Antonovich E.K., Artamonova E.A., Velikiy D.P. i dr. Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Glavy 1 - 32.1. Postateynyy nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy; otv. red. L.A. Voskobitova. M.: Redaktsiya quot;Rossiyskoy gazety quot;, 2015. Vyp. III - IV. 912 s. i dr.
KHupsergenov KH.M. Nekotorye pravovye i prakticheskie voprosy otmeny i izmeneniya mery presecheniya v vide zaklyucheniya pod strazhu // Aprobatsiya. 2015. № 8 (35). S. 73-76 i dr.
Golovinskaya I.V. Institut mer presecheniya: problemy diversifikatsii i varianty ikh razresheniya // Sovremennoe pravo. 2016. N 3. S. 90 - 96.
Keywords:
the criminal process, measures of criminal procedural coercion, measure.