The debtor's objections against the claim of the new creditor
( Pp. 72-75)
More about authors
Sitdikova Lyubov Borisovna
d-r yurid. nauk, professor. Dolzhnost: professor. Mesto raboty: Moskovskiy gorodskoy pedagogicheskiy universitet. Podrazdelenie: kafedra grazhdansko-pravovyh disciplin
Moscow city pedagogical University Lenkovskaya Renata Romanovna kand. yurid. nauk. Dolzhnost: docent. Mesto raboty: Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy socialnyy universitet. Podrazdelenie: kafedra grazhdansko-pravovyh disciplin.
Russian state social University
Moscow city pedagogical University Lenkovskaya Renata Romanovna kand. yurid. nauk. Dolzhnost: docent. Mesto raboty: Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy socialnyy universitet. Podrazdelenie: kafedra grazhdansko-pravovyh disciplin.
Russian state social University
Abstract:
The article analyzes the norms of the civil legislation and jurisprudence governing the change of persons in obligation in the form of the debtor's objections against requirements of the new creditor. A comprehensive review of the theoretical and practical aspects have allowed us to formulate that the debtor's objections against requirements of the new creditor should be limited to the obligations established and registered in the name confirmed at the time of transfer of a debt.
How to Cite:
Sitdikova L.B., Lenkovskaya R.R., (2016), THE DEBTOR'S OBJECTIONS AGAINST THE CLAIM OF THE NEW CREDITOR. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 72-75.
Reference list:
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 № 51-FZ// Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF, 05.12.1994, № 32, st. 3301.
Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 28.12.2009 po delu № A56-11103/2009/
Postanovlenie FAS Povolzhskogo okruga ot 20.11.2007 po delu № A57-9874/2006-39. // SPS Konsul tantPlyus. Sudebnaya praktika .
Postanovlenie FAS Zapadno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 22.11.2004 № F04-8186/2004(6448-A46-24. // SPS Konsul tantPlyus. Sudebnaya praktika .
Postanovlenie FAS Volgo-Vyatskogo okruga ot 17.09.2009 po delu № A29-1447/2009, Postanovlenie FAS Moskovskogo okruga ot 10.09.2007 № KG-A40/7490-07. // SPS Konsul tantPlyus. Sudebnaya praktika .
Postanovlenie FAS Povolzhskogo okruga ot 05.12.2008 // SPS Konsul tantPlyus. Sudebnaya praktika .
Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 22.04.2009 // SPS Konsul tantPlyus. Sudebnaya praktika .
Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 16.10.2009 // SPS Konsul tantPlyus. Sudebnaya praktika .
Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 11.01.2006. № F08-6242/2005; Postanovlenie Trinadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 03.03.2010. po delu № A26-6490/2009. // SPS Konsul tantPlyus. Sudebnaya praktika .
Opredelenie VAS RF ot 30.12.2008. № 17109/08. // SPS Konsul tantPlyus. Sudebnaya praktika .
Kontseptsiya razvitiya grazhdanskogo zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2009. № 11.
Egorova M. A. Sovpadenie dolzhnika i kreditora v obespechitel nykh obyazatel stvakh (na primere zaloga i poruchitel stva) // Grazhdanskoe pravo. 2015. № 2. S. 3.
Kolesnikov O.A. K voprosu o kontseptsii perekhoda obyazatel stvennykh prav // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2011. № 7. S. 49.
Novitskiy I.B., Lunts L.A. Obshchee uchenie ob obyazatel stve. M., 1950. S. 225-226.
Pushkina A.V. Znachenie lichnosti kreditora pri ustupke trebovaniya // Grazhdanskoe pravo. 2015. № 2. S. 37-39.
Sm.: podrobnee: Romanov A.V. Proyavleniya svobody dogovora pri ispolnenii dogovornogo obyazatel stva // Grazhdanskoe pravo. 2015 № 2. S. 44-46.
Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 28.12.2009 po delu № A56-11103/2009/
Postanovlenie FAS Povolzhskogo okruga ot 20.11.2007 po delu № A57-9874/2006-39. // SPS Konsul tantPlyus. Sudebnaya praktika .
Postanovlenie FAS Zapadno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 22.11.2004 № F04-8186/2004(6448-A46-24. // SPS Konsul tantPlyus. Sudebnaya praktika .
Postanovlenie FAS Volgo-Vyatskogo okruga ot 17.09.2009 po delu № A29-1447/2009, Postanovlenie FAS Moskovskogo okruga ot 10.09.2007 № KG-A40/7490-07. // SPS Konsul tantPlyus. Sudebnaya praktika .
Postanovlenie FAS Povolzhskogo okruga ot 05.12.2008 // SPS Konsul tantPlyus. Sudebnaya praktika .
Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 22.04.2009 // SPS Konsul tantPlyus. Sudebnaya praktika .
Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 16.10.2009 // SPS Konsul tantPlyus. Sudebnaya praktika .
Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 11.01.2006. № F08-6242/2005; Postanovlenie Trinadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 03.03.2010. po delu № A26-6490/2009. // SPS Konsul tantPlyus. Sudebnaya praktika .
Opredelenie VAS RF ot 30.12.2008. № 17109/08. // SPS Konsul tantPlyus. Sudebnaya praktika .
Kontseptsiya razvitiya grazhdanskogo zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2009. № 11.
Egorova M. A. Sovpadenie dolzhnika i kreditora v obespechitel nykh obyazatel stvakh (na primere zaloga i poruchitel stva) // Grazhdanskoe pravo. 2015. № 2. S. 3.
Kolesnikov O.A. K voprosu o kontseptsii perekhoda obyazatel stvennykh prav // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2011. № 7. S. 49.
Novitskiy I.B., Lunts L.A. Obshchee uchenie ob obyazatel stve. M., 1950. S. 225-226.
Pushkina A.V. Znachenie lichnosti kreditora pri ustupke trebovaniya // Grazhdanskoe pravo. 2015. № 2. S. 37-39.
Sm.: podrobnee: Romanov A.V. Proyavleniya svobody dogovora pri ispolnenii dogovornogo obyazatel stva // Grazhdanskoe pravo. 2015 № 2. S. 44-46.
Keywords:
the debtor, the lender, the obligation, objection.
