AGREEMENT ON COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL PROCESS
( Pp. 33-37)
More about authors
Edilova Petimat Viskhanovna
aspirant. Mesto ucheby: Rossiyskiy universitet druzhby narodov. Podrazdelenie: kafedra ugolovnogo prava, processa i kriminalistiki
People’s Friendship University of Russia
People’s Friendship University of Russia
Abstract:
The article deals with the question of the conclusion of the agreement on cooperation in criminal process. It gives a detailed comparative analysis between continental and anglo - saxon institutions of the «plea bargaining». The thesis is developed and scientifically - founded the author’s concept of the pre-trial agreement on cooperation with the prosecution. The model is examined the opportunity to enter into of the pre-trial agreement on cooperation with prosecution with a person having the status of a suspect or accused; with persons under the age of 18. Taking into account the results obtained as a proposal for the improvement of the special procedure under concluding the of the conclusion of the pre-trial agreement on cooperation with the prosecution at the stage of preliminary investigation and trial of the criminal case. Method: The general scientific dialectical method of knowledge allows us to consider this phenomenon in its development, in all relationships with other procedural and criminal law institutions, as well as the general scientific methods: structural and functional, historical, formal - logical methods (analysis, synthesis, concretization, analogy, modeling), statistical, comparative, sociological (including questionnaires and interviews). Scope of the study: the analysis of chapter 40.1 of the RF Code of Criminal Procedure; formed and settle concrete proposals to improve the legislation on criminal procedure in the implementation of the institute pre-trial agreement on cooperation. Practical value: the conclusions and recommendations contained in the article can be used in the further improvement of the RF Code of Criminal Procedure; in research work on this issue.
How to Cite:
Edilova P.V., (2017), AGREEMENT ON COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL PROCESS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 33-37.
Reference list:
Andriyanova O.YU. Osobennosti sudoproizvodstva po ugolovnym delam o prestupleniyakh nesovershennoletnikh: avtoref. dis. kand. nauk. Vladimir: 2006;
Bertovskiy L.V., Edilova P.V. Problemy poiska istiny v ugolovnom protsesse i dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov: yuridicheskie nauki. - 2014. - №4. - S. 238-252;
Bertovskiy L.V., Edilova P.V. Problemy razvitiya instituta dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // CHernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve.- 2015. - №3. - S. 120 - 124;
Gutsenko K.F. Ugolovnyy protsess osnovnykh kapitalisticheskikh gosudarstv (Angliya, SSHA). - M.: 2001;
Kachalova O.V. Uskorennoe proizvodstvo v Rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse: dis . doktora yurid. nauk. M.: 2016. S.483;
Ozhegov S.I., SHvedov N.YU. Tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka. - M.: Az . - 1992;
Postanovlenie ESPCH po delu Peres protiv Frantsii ot 12 fervalya 2004 g. (zhaloba №47287/99)//SPS Konsul tantPlyus ;
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 28.06.201 №16 O praktike primeneniya sudami osobogo poryadka sudebnogo razbiratel stva ugolovnykh del pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // elektronnyy variant http://www.consultant. ru/document/cons doc LAW 131884;
Rossiyskoe zakonodatel stvo X-XX vekov/ pod obshch. red. O.I. CHistyakova. T. 1, M.: 1984. S. 57;
Ryzhakov A.P. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve: postateynyy kommentariy k novoy glave UPK RF// Delo i servis. Moskva, 2010. S. 64;
Svodnye statisticheskie svedeniya o deyatel nosti federal nykh sudov obshchey yurisdiktsii i mirovykh sudey // Elektronnyy resurs : URL:http://www.cdep.ru/ index.php id 79 item (data obrashcheniya: 24.09.2012).
Sementsov V.A., SHeremet ev A.P. nachalo i okonchanie razumnogo sroka v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve// Obshchestvo i pravo. 2010. №5;
Sukharev A.YA., Krutskikh V.E. Bol shoy yuridicheskiy slovar . - M.: Infra-M. - 2003;
Edilova P.V. Vozmeshchenie vreda poterpevshemu ot prestupleniya pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Probely v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2016. - №7. - S. 50-55;
Edilova P.V. Zaklyuchenie dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve s nesovershennoletnimi // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie nauki, kul turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. - 2015. - №5(55), ch. 2. - S. 215 - 217;
Edilova P.V. Nekotorye problemnye aspekty zaklyucheniya dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Probely v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2016. - №5. - S. 180 - 185.
Bertovskiy L.V., Edilova P.V. Problemy poiska istiny v ugolovnom protsesse i dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov: yuridicheskie nauki. - 2014. - №4. - S. 238-252;
Bertovskiy L.V., Edilova P.V. Problemy razvitiya instituta dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // CHernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve.- 2015. - №3. - S. 120 - 124;
Gutsenko K.F. Ugolovnyy protsess osnovnykh kapitalisticheskikh gosudarstv (Angliya, SSHA). - M.: 2001;
Kachalova O.V. Uskorennoe proizvodstvo v Rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse: dis . doktora yurid. nauk. M.: 2016. S.483;
Ozhegov S.I., SHvedov N.YU. Tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka. - M.: Az . - 1992;
Postanovlenie ESPCH po delu Peres protiv Frantsii ot 12 fervalya 2004 g. (zhaloba №47287/99)//SPS Konsul tantPlyus ;
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 28.06.201 №16 O praktike primeneniya sudami osobogo poryadka sudebnogo razbiratel stva ugolovnykh del pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // elektronnyy variant http://www.consultant. ru/document/cons doc LAW 131884;
Rossiyskoe zakonodatel stvo X-XX vekov/ pod obshch. red. O.I. CHistyakova. T. 1, M.: 1984. S. 57;
Ryzhakov A.P. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve: postateynyy kommentariy k novoy glave UPK RF// Delo i servis. Moskva, 2010. S. 64;
Svodnye statisticheskie svedeniya o deyatel nosti federal nykh sudov obshchey yurisdiktsii i mirovykh sudey // Elektronnyy resurs : URL:http://www.cdep.ru/ index.php id 79 item (data obrashcheniya: 24.09.2012).
Sementsov V.A., SHeremet ev A.P. nachalo i okonchanie razumnogo sroka v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve// Obshchestvo i pravo. 2010. №5;
Sukharev A.YA., Krutskikh V.E. Bol shoy yuridicheskiy slovar . - M.: Infra-M. - 2003;
Edilova P.V. Vozmeshchenie vreda poterpevshemu ot prestupleniya pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Probely v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2016. - №7. - S. 50-55;
Edilova P.V. Zaklyuchenie dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve s nesovershennoletnimi // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie nauki, kul turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. - 2015. - №5(55), ch. 2. - S. 215 - 217;
Edilova P.V. Nekotorye problemnye aspekty zaklyucheniya dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Probely v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2016. - №5. - S. 180 - 185.
Keywords:
pre-trial agreement on cooperation, agreement with the prosecution, procedural status, the accused, contractors, the victim, minors.