REGULATION IN THE CODE OF CRIMINAL OF RUSSIA THE RULES, FIXING THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS (COMPARATIVE APPROACH)
( Pp. 155-159)

More about authors
Artem A. Popov Cand. Sci. (Law), Advisor to the Head of Serpukhov City District, Moscow Region
Abstract:
Task: 1) analysis of the norms of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Russia and the near abroad, establishes the right of the admissibility of testimony as sources of proof-ments in criminal proceedings; 2) improvement of the criminal-procedural legislation. Methods: of Comparative Law. Results: made additional arguments concerning the existing theory of criminal proceedings positions, as well as present new proposals and recommendations concerning the legal regulation of the rules on the inadmissibility of evidence.
How to Cite:
Artem A.P., (2015), REGULATION IN THE CODE OF CRIMINAL OF RUSSIA THE RULES, FIXING THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS (COMPARATIVE APPROACH). Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 155-159.
Reference list:
Grigor ev V.N., Pobedkin A.V., YAshin V.N. Ugolovnyy protsess: uchebnik. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Eksmo, 2008.
Zinchenko I.A. Ugolovno-protsessual naya politika v kontekste ugolovnoy politiki gosudarstva / Ugolovnyy protsess. Problemnye lektsii: uchebnik / pod red. V.T.Tomina, I.A. Zinchenko. M.: YUrayt, 2013.
Kipnis M.N. Dopustimost dokazatel stv po novomu UPK // Vozmozhnosti zashchity po novomu UPK Rossii. Materialy nauch.-prakt. konferentsii advokatov / pod red. G.M. Reznika, E.YU.L vovoy. M., 2004. S. 12 - 14.
Kostenko R.V. Nekotorye problemy zakonodatel noy reglamentatsii dopustimosti dokazatel stv v UPK RF // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2014. № 6. S. 108 - 114.
Lazareva V.A. Dokazyvanie v ugolovnom protsesse: ucheb.-praktich. posobie. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: YUrayt, 2011.
Lednev A.E. Pokazaniya svidetelya kak ugolovno-protsessual noe dokazatel stvo: avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. N.Novgorod, 2006.
Lupinskaya P.A. Dokazatel stva i dokazyvanie v novom ugolovnom protsesse // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2002. № 7. S. 3 - 7.
Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii / pod obshch. red. V.M.Lebedeva. 7-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: YUrayt, 2010.
Novikov S.A. Pokazaniya obvinyaemogo v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii: problemy dopustimosti // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2014. № 2. S. 41 - 44.
Popov A.P. Dokazyvanie pri proizvodstve po ugolovnomu delu // Mirovoy sud ya. 2006. № 2. S. 18 - 24.
Popov A.P. Funktsii-zadachi organov i dolzhnostnykh lits, vedushchikh protsess, zakonnye interesy drugikh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva i ikh mesto v dostizhenii tseli ugolovnogo protsessa // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2005. № 4. S. 168 - 172.
Popov A.P. TSel dokazyvaniya v sovremennom otechestvennom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2005. № 1. S. 217 - 225.
Popov A.P., Popova I.A., Zinchenko I.A. Ugolovnyy protsess: problemy dokazatel stvennogo prava sovremennoy Rossii: monografiya. Pyatigorsk: Reklamno-informatsionnoe agentstvo na KMV, 2014.
Rozovskiy B.G. Kogda problemu ishchut ne tam, gde ona deystvitel no est (zapiski vsem nedovol nogo cheloveka) // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2014. № 1 (12). S. 152 - 167.
Rozovskiy B.G. Nenauchnye zametki o nekotorykh nauchnykh problemakh ugolovnogo protsessa. Lugansk: RIO LAVD, 2004.
Tomin V.T. Ostrye ugly ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. M.: YUrid. lit., 1991.
Tomin V.T. Ugolovnyy protsess: aktual nye problemy teorii i praktiki. M.: YUrayt, 2009.
Ugolovnyy protsess: uchebnik / pod red. V.M.Lebedeva. M.: YUrayt, 2010.
Ugolovnyy protsess sovremennoy Rossii. Problemnye lektsii: ucheb. posobie dlya bakalavriata i magistratury / pod red. V.T. Tomina, I.A. Zinchenko. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: YUrayt, 2014.
Keywords:
comparative law, law of evidence, the admissibility of evidence, testimony, questioning.