THE DISTINCTIVE FEATURES OF THE POST-REFORM PROCEDURE OF JUDGES' NOMINATION AND TERMINATION OF THEIR POWERS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
( Pp. 47-50)
More about authors
Polovchenko Konstantin A.
Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Department of Constitutional Law
MGIMO University
Moscow, Russian Federation
MGIMO University
Moscow, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The article presents the analysis of the post-reform procedure of nomination and termination of powers of a judge in the Republic of Serbia. Modern Serbia has a strong constitutional basis of the legal status of judges. However, some questions concerning the normative regulation of the process of election and termination of powers of a judge, cause fair criticism of Serbian and foreign experts. These include three-year probationary period for newly elected judge and the overly important role of the National Assembly in the process of election of judges and presidents of courts, as well as reporting of the High Judicial Council to the National Assembly and, finally, exception from the Constitution of grounds and conditions of judge's termination of powers. Analyzing the content of "features" of the Serbian legislation regulating the election and termination of powers of the serbian judge, the author comes to the conclusion that they are consistent with international standards in the field of administration of justice.
How to Cite:
Polovchenko K.A., (2017), THE DISTINCTIVE FEATURES OF THE POST-REFORM PROCEDURE OF JUDGES' NOMINATION AND TERMINATION OF THEIR POWERS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 47-50.
Reference list:
M. Pa vanchi . O sudsko vlasti u ustavnom sistemu Srbie u kontekstu me unarodnikh standarda. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, 3/2011.
M. Pajvan i . Komentar Ustava Rebublike Srbije. Beograd. 2009.
R. Markovi . Ustavno pravo i politichke institutsi e. Beograd. 2011.
V. Raki -Vodineli , A. Kne evi Bojovi , M. Reljanovi . Reforma pravosu a u Srbiji 2008-2012. Beograd. 2012.
European Commission. Brussels. 9 November 2010. SEC(2010) 1330. Serbia 2010 Progress Report.
Polovchenko K.A. Konstitutsionnyy kontrol v Respublike Serbiya. / Konstitutsionnyy kontrol v zarubezhnykh stranakh: kollektivnaya monografiya / YU.I. Leybo i dr. ; pod red. E.YA. Pavlova, E.A. Kremyanskoy; Mosk. gos. in-t mezhdunar. otnosheniy (un-t) MID Rossii; kaf. konstitutsionnogo prava. - M.: MGIMO-Universitet. 2015.
Polovchenko K.A. Institut sudebnogo konstitutsionnogo kontrolya v postsovetskikh gosudarstvakh. Vestnik MGIMO. №3. 2013.
Tumanov V.A. Polovchenko K.A. Konstitutsionnye osnovy sudebnoy vlasti. / Konstitutsionnoe pravo zarubezhnykh stran: uchebnik / pod obshch. red M.V. Baglaya, YU.I. Leybo, L.M. Entina. - 4-e izd., pereab. i dop. - M.: Norma: INFRA-M. 2016.
M. Pajvan i . Komentar Ustava Rebublike Srbije. Beograd. 2009.
R. Markovi . Ustavno pravo i politichke institutsi e. Beograd. 2011.
V. Raki -Vodineli , A. Kne evi Bojovi , M. Reljanovi . Reforma pravosu a u Srbiji 2008-2012. Beograd. 2012.
European Commission. Brussels. 9 November 2010. SEC(2010) 1330. Serbia 2010 Progress Report.
Polovchenko K.A. Konstitutsionnyy kontrol v Respublike Serbiya. / Konstitutsionnyy kontrol v zarubezhnykh stranakh: kollektivnaya monografiya / YU.I. Leybo i dr. ; pod red. E.YA. Pavlova, E.A. Kremyanskoy; Mosk. gos. in-t mezhdunar. otnosheniy (un-t) MID Rossii; kaf. konstitutsionnogo prava. - M.: MGIMO-Universitet. 2015.
Polovchenko K.A. Institut sudebnogo konstitutsionnogo kontrolya v postsovetskikh gosudarstvakh. Vestnik MGIMO. №3. 2013.
Tumanov V.A. Polovchenko K.A. Konstitutsionnye osnovy sudebnoy vlasti. / Konstitutsionnoe pravo zarubezhnykh stran: uchebnik / pod obshch. red M.V. Baglaya, YU.I. Leybo, L.M. Entina. - 4-e izd., pereab. i dop. - M.: Norma: INFRA-M. 2016.
Keywords:
The Serbian Constitution of 2006, The judicial system of the Republic of Serbia, The law on judges, The order of election judge, The term of office of judge, Grounds for termination of office of judge, The national Assembly, The high judicial Council.
